Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Would you get naked in DC...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Would you get naked in DC... - Page 2  

Poll Results: Would you get naked in DC and carry a big inflatabe penis replica in order to get the attention of B

 
  • 4% (5)
    For sure!
  • 86% (94)
    No way!
  • 9% (10)
    Maybe
109 Total Votes  
post #21 of 33
No, absolutely not.


I want this to be taken seriously, not seen as a freakshow in a circus. Nobody is going to listen to someone behaving like that. They'll just roll their eyes and walk on the other side of the street. As would I.
post #22 of 33
Thread Starter 
Quote:
BamaDude:
I have to ask this: Is April Fool's Day the best possible day for us to march on Washington if we want our cause to be taken seriously?

YIKES! Never thought of that. I just have to mention that to David of SIC Society.
post #23 of 33
Quote:
I have to ask this: Is April Fool's Day the best possible day for us to march on Washington if we want our cause to be taken seriously?
This.

And the getting naked to get attention thing? No, that's f-ing ridiculous and a great way to discredit us as crazy or even a joke.
post #24 of 33
I admire your spirit but my answer is, no, this is not the best way to combat RIC in America. It would draw attention, true, but what sort of attention would it be?

I've been at this a long time, and I can report that most people are (still) all too willing to dismiss those of us who oppose circumcision as crackpots, extremists, the lunatic fringe, and carrying an inflatable penis through the streets is probably not going to dispel that unfounded image. I've found the best way to fight the good fight is through calmly, rationally, patiently combating ignorance with facts, and all the while show how normal (ugh, yes I know, lol) we are. It doesn't necessarily require a lot of money, just a steadfast resolve to represent the truth in the best light.

Believe me, we've made huge strides forward since I got into this issue in the dark ages of the mid-1980's, and I'm very proud of what we've accomplished and keep on accomplishing every day!
post #25 of 33
We march twice in washington and the dates have specific meanings with reguards to child abuse prevention month and the passing of the FGM laws.

THe march on the 30th of March commemorates the passing of genital mutilation protection for females.

The march on the 1st of April marks the beginning of child abuse prevention month.
post #26 of 33
The intactavists I know, and the people I know who have kept their babies whole and intact are normal people.

Think legitimacy, professionalism, and information when you're protesting this....some already think the whole idea of a child keeping a whole penis is "radical".
post #27 of 33
I voted "maybe" before reading any responses because I *would* do it if I

1. thought it would help and
2. were assured that I would not be arrested.

I'm all for civil disobedience as long as it does some good and parents whose children need them don't wind up behind bars.

After reading the responses, I agree about looking normal. I'm a barefooter. There are times that it behooves me to wear flip flops (at the very least) because I'm involved in several organizations (diaperfreebaby.com and a local homebirth group to name a couple). I'm not ashamed of being a barefooter - I'm barefoot everywhere normally, but if I'm representing a group then I will typically choose to wear footwear because the group I'm representing doesn't necessarily want to be associated with barefooters. Barefooting is just not socially acceptable to some people and I would rather wear shoes on a rare occasion than potentially turn people away by my unusual manner of dress.

Sorry to go OT even more, but this post also made me think of No Pants 2k8:
http://improveverywhere.com/2008/01/16/no-pants-2k8/

love and peace.
post #28 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by kldliam View Post
ok-
so my reasons for posting were to try and find out:

1. How far you would personally go to try to end MGM
2. How far you would personally go to try and get BIG media attention

What is that old saying about publicity....there is no bad publicity?
Matter of opinion I guess.

Anyway, I am feeling a bit frustrated that big media still largely ignores us.
WHY????? HOW can we change this???? HOW do you MAKE MEDIA SEE THIS??? HOW do you make a COUNTRY SEE THIS???

HOW do you get the masses (via the media), who ignore you, to LISTEN, LOOK, THINK when you are on a shoe-string budget?

The internet only goes so far. We need to be in the media more, without a doubt. But how?

What's your bright idea?
Actually, I think the Internet has helped to accelerate the cause more than just about anything before. It is a cheap and efficient way to get the word out. How else do Americans learn they are the only ones who circumcise infants routinely for no particular reason?

As for big media, I agree we need more big media attention though we are getting some. For example: In the New York Time in December, A pretty reasonable article was written titled "The Rights of Baby Boys" and the whole issue was circumcision. While the article was fairly neutral (actually I think it leaned in our direction) the comments were very good and the story author seemed genuinely interested.

So what did I do? In addition to commenting frequently on the article, I sent the author an email:

Quote:
Ms. Pope -

I have been following and commenting on your recent piece, The Rights of
Baby Boys. As others have done I wanted to thank you, but "off line" as it
were, for bringing this topic out into a main stream publication and
allowing the conversation to flow as it did. Although it may have seemed
like the conversation was "fired up" it was quite tame as they go for this
subject. Here is one that went on for nearly two years:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=49943 (You may notice that most of
the people who try to defend circumcision are from the US)

As I mentioned in post 540, I hope that there were people following
the conversation, even if not participating, who took out some good
information. The opportunity to get good information, or get pointed to good
sources, is very important since the sad fact is that, in the US, there are
still many people who don't realize that the US is the only country that
circumcises a majority of their boys for non-religious reasons; and with
that are the rumors and misconceptions that get spread about intact boys and
the care of intact boys that puts those who escape circumcision at risk.

Unfortunately, these misconceptions are not just among the population but
also among many practicing physicians. Despite the fact that the AAP care of
intact boys is mostly correct some physicians, for example, may tell parents
that they have to retract and clean regularly. Not only is this incorrect
but it can be damaging as most boys aren't retractable until early puberty.
Some physicians may also not know that most cases of phimosis, which can't
really be diagnosed until puberty, can be treated with betamethasone 0.05%
cream (post 449). A brief look at this site:
http://www.mothering.com/discussions...splay.php?f=44 and this site:
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/index5.html will show you some of the
stories that have come out of doctor visits.

With this in mind I wanted to ask if you would do a piece in your
Health/Wellness section that could address these issues since you already
broke the ice with your current article, and seemed interested in how it
turned out. Although I don't speak for them, I have little doubt that
someone from NOCIRC (www.nocirc.org) or DOC
(www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org) or both would be more than willing to provide information or do some sort of interview. The article could dispel
myths associated with reasons to circumcise, such as the notion that an
intact boy is somehow dirtier, as well as provide accurate information on
what not to do in terms of care, no special or exotic steps are required.
Perhaps break it into two parts: Why you don't need to circumcise and Proper
care. I think this could be an invaluable resource for the public.

Again I don't speak for either of those groups, I am more of a 'fellow
traveler' who pops in and tries to correct bad information when I see it but
I do know that such an article in a large publication such as yours would
help a lot of boys by helping to crush persistent myths. I hope you would
consider it; if you do the links in my post 540 would be a good jumping off
point specifically http://www.circumstitions.com/ Thanks again.
So here is a recommendation I'll make to the board. Send Ms. Pope an email and support my request; ask if she would do a story along the lines I outlined above. I like this particular approach because it is the least controversial. A story in the NYT Health and Wellness section that does an entire piece on care of an intact boy. No particular advocacy but just informational. (Actually the advocacy is subtly embedded insofar as you are destroying the myths) But it is non confrontational enough that I could see her writing about it. After doing a "rights" article. I haven't heard back but if more people write in perhaps she'll pick it up. Personal stories would be useful. "My Doctor gave me bad advice, I think it is a problem could you do a story.." See.

Let me take it a step further. If any of you have a local paper with a health and wellness section perhaps you could write them and ask that they do a story as outlined above. Again just information not advocacy, at least not out right. A smaller town or county paper might be easier to reach.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse View Post
You're right, the internet only goes so far. That's why whenever NoCirc sponsors an ad in a national baby magazine I try to donate. My plan for the new year was to sponsor a billboard. Obviously, that is local attention, not national, but at least it's something (I've put up the money and made some calls but I haven't placed the billboard ad just yet, hopefully before summer...).
Night_Nurse, what does that cost? (The billboard that is) Also for those who are interested NoCirc is looking to do one of those ads (national baby magazine) in May. They ran at least seven of them last year and I am told that it defiantly generates interest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse View Post
We, individually and as a group, need to think of creative ways to spread the word. I thought aerial advertising (banner behind a plane) would be a great idea and spawn a lot of attention. Doing that for one day was going to cost more than twice what a monthly billboard would cost so I dropped that idea. I'm only one person. Maybe some cheap and creative ideas would be to call into radio talk shows, write letters to the newspaper editor, hold up banners on nationally broadcasted shows (think the Today show) or sporting events, bring up the issue at a townhall meeting with your state congress person (how your state shouldn't cover RIC with Medicaid payments), etc. It's late and I can't think of other ideas but I know some people here will have clever suggestions.
There are a lot of good ideas along those lines, I have contributed significant content to blogs that pop up from time to time, correcting information. To my surprise most comments are definitely anticirc. It seems the message is getting out because although I see similar names from time to time, I often see lots of people I've never heard of it tells me things are getting better. This is a good way to go; anywhere you see a discussion drop in your two cents. Just keep it straight forward, to the point, and rational.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse View Post
I just think everyone who is against it needs to do something. Placing a bumper sticker, wearing a t-shirt, writing your insurance company, posting on message boards, talking to pregnant friends, these are all things we can do to educate people everyday. It's very disheartening to read some of the things people out there say about intact males. So much work needs to be done. There IS power in numbers! If we all work together we can do greater good!
While I like the idea I was never much of a bumper sticker or t-shirt person.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankly Speaking View Post
I see this as the single biggest impediment in our movement, the shortage of cash to move the movement ahead. Just over the weekend, I saw a report of a social function that raised more money in one evening than the entire year's budget for NOCIRC and all the other intactivist organizations combined. I see many movements that have far, far more money and are not nearly as important as this one.

I myself have donated more money to the cause than all of my charitable contributions combined in my life but I realize that most involved in the movement are young, trying to support a family, save for college educations, etc. That's the nature of being young, there's just not much money to contribute to our cause or any cause. But seemingly insignificant amounts of money add up to amounts that can alter the course of events. Just 10 years ago, you could have put all the intactivists on a bus and now, there are thousands of us. At $5 or $10 each every year, we can have a public presence and a presence in the media and that is certainly an amount we can all afford. I challenge everyone here to make a donation, no matter how small, to one of the organizations and to vow to make a similar donation every year.

Frank
Money is the biggest challenge. I forwarded Marilyn the price schedules for advertising in the local mass transit system and I think 10k was the minimum buy for a four week slot. I also try and send what I can I think this is one of the better ways to go; small amounts, any amount it doesn't matter. (I hope this last part wasn't a UAV) if it was mods just delete the paragraph.
post #29 of 33
Here are a bunch of advocacy ideas, and fortunately, none of them require getting nekkid!!

http://www.noharmm.org/ideas.htm


PS. The easiest thing to do is make sure you have an anti-circumcision/pro-intact signature here on MDC, and post in lots of other forums!!!
post #30 of 33
With all the things I've done to promote intactness, I think having two intact boys will have the most long-term effect.
post #31 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanity rules View Post
I've been at this a long time, and I can report that most people are (still) all too willing to dismiss those of us who oppose circumcision as crackpots, extremists, the lunatic fringe, and carrying an inflatable penis through the streets is probably not going to dispel that unfounded image. I've found the best way to fight the good fight is through calmly, rationally, patiently combating ignorance with facts, and all the while show how normal (ugh, yes I know, lol) we are.
I agree whole heartedly with this. Some examples are a man back in the early 1980's who became involved in the intactivist movement. Unfortunately, he was also an pedophile and the pro-circumcision forces used him as an example to assert that all intactivists are pedophiles. Even though it has been almost 30 years since that incidence, I still see it occasionally. In another instance, Edgar Schoen found a discussion on a homosexual board about restoration and used that to claim all restorers are gay. That is certainly not the case but the pro-circumcision forces try to use that as a justification to advocate circumcision. The implication is that only gay men would not want to be circumcised and if you don't circumcise your son, he will probably turn out to be gay.



Quote:
It doesn't necessarily require a lot of money, just a steadfast resolve to represent the truth in the best light.

This is certainly true. We have had an amazing influence on the culture of America with virtually no money. However, with a little bit of money, we could move past the internet into the mainstream and reach those who do not visit parenting boards or who by-pass the circumcision forums.


Quote:
Believe me, we've made huge strides forward since I got into this issue in the dark ages of the mid-1980's, and I'm very proud of what we've accomplished and keep on accomplishing every day!
We've made huge strides just since the turn of the century. We have to remember at that time, this very forum was a debate forum and many came here to advocate circumcision. Thankfully, that is not the case any longer.


Quote:
Originally Posted by phatchristy
The intactavists I know, and the people I know who have kept their babies whole and intact are normal people.

Think legitimacy, professionalism, and information when you're protesting this....some already think the whole idea of a child keeping a whole penis is "radical".

On a forum somewhere in the past, the pros were accusing us of being radicals and I wrote "Look around at those posting against circumcision. We are all so normal and conservative we could all be Republicans!" That got a lot of laughs because it was true.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jwhispers
Night_Nurse, what does that cost? (The billboard that is)

Billboard space is generally sold on contract for a specified length of time. Generally the panels of the billboard are moved at specific intervals to get the most wide spread message. The advertiser has to pay an upfront charge to create the moveable panels and then the monthly charge. I don't know what the charge is today but about 25 years ago, the rates in a major metropolitan area for "A" sites started at about $1,500 per month IRC. Extrapolate that to the present day and you'll have an idea.

But, there may be a better way. I know of one local NOCIRC chapter that found an outdoor advertising company (billboard company) that agreed to put the panels up when they had a vacant billboard for no charge. The local chapter did have to pay about $1,500.00 to get the panels created but after that, the advertising was free and the panels were moved around all over town.



Frank
post #32 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by carriebft View Post
We march twice in washington and the dates have specific meanings with reguards to child abuse prevention month and the passing of the FGM laws.

THe march on the 30th of March commemorates the passing of genital mutilation protection for females.

The march on the 1st of April marks the beginning of child abuse prevention month.

I've only attended the demonstration once. Not only is it on April Fool's Day but it also coincides with the Cherry Blossom Festival.

The problem with that is airfare and hotels are super-expensive that time of year (I'm still amazed at how expensive our hotel was for 4 days and we weren't at the Ritz either).

The great thing about that time of year is many people are out in DC for the Cherry Blossoms so lots of people get to see the banners and demonstrators outside of the Capitol! I knew about the March 30th date but I had no idea April 1 was the start of child abuse prevention month. Good to know!
post #33 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwhispers View Post
Night_Nurse, what does that cost? (The billboard that is) Also for those who are interested NoCirc is looking to do one of those ads (national baby magazine) in May. They ran at least seven of them last year and I am told that it defiantly generates interest.
I put up $2,000 for a billboard. I communicated with a few people a while back and received numbers ranging from $400 to $1,500 per month for a billboard (for areas not in my state). I know it varies according to the location (city and also physical location of the board). So I figured 2K would be adequate. I didn't factor in that these ad companies would want a contract of a minimum amount of time. 3 months for a "non-profit" rate of $2,700 per month is what I've found in my area. Of course, that was for specific freeway locations. $7,100 is a bit steep for me to sponsor over 3 months. I need to call and see if the billboard companies will give me any generic location for less money or a one month contract only. I guess a billboard out in the boonies would be better than no billboard at all.
If anybody has any past experience with this or works in advertising, I'd love to receive a pm from you!
I have been told by the billboard companies I've contacted so far that they do not accept anything controversial, like abortion, or religious messages. So I'm wondering how an anti-circ message would factor into this (plus, I've seen billboards for condom stores, nude bars, churches, etc, why would circ be any more "controversial" than that???).

If I can't get a local billboard ad I guess I'll use the funds for local ads in parenting/baby mags. The local ads are fairly inexpensive, around $75 per ad, if they will be accepted due to their "controversial" message!


Quote:
While I like the idea I was never much of a bumper sticker or t-shirt person.
I understand. But the bumper sticker doesn't have to be placed on your vehicle. They can be placed...elsewhere...around town...

My t-shirt that has Yoda on it and says "May the foreskin be with you" has sparked a few funny conversations!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Would you get naked in DC...