Quote:
Originally Posted by kldliam 
ok-
so my reasons for posting were to try and find out:
1. How far you would personally go to try to end MGM
2. How far you would personally go to try and get BIG media attention
What is that old saying about publicity....there is no bad publicity?
Matter of opinion I guess.
Anyway, I am feeling a bit frustrated that big media still largely ignores us.
WHY????? HOW can we change this???? HOW do you MAKE MEDIA SEE THIS??? HOW do you make a COUNTRY SEE THIS???
HOW do you get the masses (via the media), who ignore you, to LISTEN, LOOK, THINK when you are on a shoe-string budget?
The internet only goes so far. We need to be in the media more, without a doubt. But how?
What's your bright idea?
|
Actually, I think the Internet has helped to accelerate the cause more than just about anything before. It is a cheap and efficient way to get the word out. How else do Americans learn they are the only ones who circumcise infants routinely for no particular reason?
As for big media, I agree we need more big media attention though we are getting some. For example: In the New York Time in December, A pretty reasonable article was written titled
"The Rights of Baby Boys" and the whole issue was circumcision. While the article was fairly neutral (actually I think it leaned in our direction) the comments were very good and the story author seemed genuinely interested.
So what did I do? In addition to commenting frequently on the article, I sent the author an email:
Quote:
Ms. Pope -
I have been following and commenting on your recent piece, The Rights of
Baby Boys. As others have done I wanted to thank you, but "off line" as it
were, for bringing this topic out into a main stream publication and
allowing the conversation to flow as it did. Although it may have seemed
like the conversation was "fired up" it was quite tame as they go for this
subject. Here is one that went on for nearly two years: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=49943 (You may notice that most of
the people who try to defend circumcision are from the US)
As I mentioned in post 540, I hope that there were people following
the conversation, even if not participating, who took out some good
information. The opportunity to get good information, or get pointed to good
sources, is very important since the sad fact is that, in the US, there are
still many people who don't realize that the US is the only country that
circumcises a majority of their boys for non-religious reasons; and with
that are the rumors and misconceptions that get spread about intact boys and
the care of intact boys that puts those who escape circumcision at risk.
Unfortunately, these misconceptions are not just among the population but
also among many practicing physicians. Despite the fact that the AAP care of
intact boys is mostly correct some physicians, for example, may tell parents
that they have to retract and clean regularly. Not only is this incorrect
but it can be damaging as most boys aren't retractable until early puberty.
Some physicians may also not know that most cases of phimosis, which can't
really be diagnosed until puberty, can be treated with betamethasone 0.05%
cream (post 449). A brief look at this site: http://www.mothering.com/discussions...splay.php?f=44 and this site: http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/index5.html will show you some of the
stories that have come out of doctor visits.
With this in mind I wanted to ask if you would do a piece in your
Health/Wellness section that could address these issues since you already
broke the ice with your current article, and seemed interested in how it
turned out. Although I don't speak for them, I have little doubt that
someone from NOCIRC (www.nocirc.org) or DOC
(www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org) or both would be more than willing to provide information or do some sort of interview. The article could dispel
myths associated with reasons to circumcise, such as the notion that an
intact boy is somehow dirtier, as well as provide accurate information on
what not to do in terms of care, no special or exotic steps are required.
Perhaps break it into two parts: Why you don't need to circumcise and Proper
care. I think this could be an invaluable resource for the public.
Again I don't speak for either of those groups, I am more of a 'fellow
traveler' who pops in and tries to correct bad information when I see it but
I do know that such an article in a large publication such as yours would
help a lot of boys by helping to crush persistent myths. I hope you would
consider it; if you do the links in my post 540 would be a good jumping off
point specifically http://www.circumstitions.com/ Thanks again. |
So here is a recommendation I'll make to the board. Send Ms. Pope an email and support my request; ask if she would do a story along the lines I outlined above. I like this particular approach because it is the least controversial. A story in the NYT Health and Wellness section that does an entire piece on care of an intact boy. No particular advocacy but just informational. (Actually the advocacy is subtly embedded insofar as you are destroying the myths) But it is non confrontational enough that I could see her writing about it. After doing a "rights" article. I haven't heard back but if more people write in perhaps she'll pick it up. Personal stories would be useful. "My Doctor gave me bad advice, I think it is a problem could you do a story.." See.

Let me take it a step further. If any of you have a local paper with a health and wellness section perhaps you could write them and ask that they do a story as outlined above. Again just information not advocacy, at least not out right. A smaller town or county paper might be easier to reach.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse 
You're right, the internet only goes so far. That's why whenever NoCirc sponsors an ad in a national baby magazine I try to donate. My plan for the new year was to sponsor a billboard. Obviously, that is local attention, not national, but at least it's something (I've put up the money and made some calls but I haven't placed the billboard ad just yet, hopefully before summer...).
|
Night_Nurse, what does that cost? (The billboard that is) Also for those who are interested NoCirc is looking to do one of those ads (national baby magazine) in May. They ran at least seven of them last year and I am told that it defiantly generates interest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse 
We, individually and as a group, need to think of creative ways to spread the word. I thought aerial advertising (banner behind a plane) would be a great idea and spawn a lot of attention. Doing that for one day was going to cost more than twice what a monthly billboard would cost so I dropped that idea. I'm only one person. Maybe some cheap and creative ideas would be to call into radio talk shows, write letters to the newspaper editor, hold up banners on nationally broadcasted shows (think the Today show) or sporting events, bring up the issue at a townhall meeting with your state congress person (how your state shouldn't cover RIC with Medicaid payments), etc. It's late and I can't think of other ideas but I know some people here will have clever suggestions.
|
There are a lot of good ideas along those lines, I have contributed significant content to blogs that pop up from time to time, correcting information. To my surprise most comments are definitely anticirc. It seems the message is getting out because although I see similar names from time to time, I often see lots of people I've never heard of it tells me things are getting better. This is a good way to go; anywhere you see a discussion drop in your two cents. Just keep it straight forward, to the point, and rational.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Night_Nurse 
I just think everyone who is against it needs to do something. Placing a bumper sticker, wearing a t-shirt, writing your insurance company, posting on message boards, talking to pregnant friends, these are all things we can do to educate people everyday. It's very disheartening to read some of the things people out there say about intact males. So much work needs to be done. There IS power in numbers! If we all work together we can do greater good!
|
While I like the idea I was never much of a bumper sticker or t-shirt person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankly Speaking 
I see this as the single biggest impediment in our movement, the shortage of cash to move the movement ahead. Just over the weekend, I saw a report of a social function that raised more money in one evening than the entire year's budget for NOCIRC and all the other intactivist organizations combined. I see many movements that have far, far more money and are not nearly as important as this one.
I myself have donated more money to the cause than all of my charitable contributions combined in my life but I realize that most involved in the movement are young, trying to support a family, save for college educations, etc. That's the nature of being young, there's just not much money to contribute to our cause or any cause. But seemingly insignificant amounts of money add up to amounts that can alter the course of events. Just 10 years ago, you could have put all the intactivists on a bus and now, there are thousands of us. At $5 or $10 each every year, we can have a public presence and a presence in the media and that is certainly an amount we can all afford. I challenge everyone here to make a donation, no matter how small, to one of the organizations and to vow to make a similar donation every year.
Frank
|
Money is the biggest challenge. I forwarded Marilyn the price schedules for advertising in the local mass transit system and I think 10k was the minimum buy for a four week slot. I also try and send what I can I think this is one of the better ways to go; small amounts, any amount it doesn't matter. (I hope this last part wasn't a UAV) if it was mods just delete the paragraph.
