And I think CBM makes a good point, too.
post #61 of 91
4/30/08 at 2:15pm
|
The thing is that I also find I just simply don't want to nurse her very often anymore. I am not creeped out by it or anything, nor do I for one moment think it's wrong, but I just don't feel like it. I don't feel like sitting there being pawed at and sucked on. I am happy -- thrilled even! -- to take lots of snuggle breaks throughout the day, where DD2 and I sit quietly and hug, or nuzzle noses or do other things that involve both of us, but perhaps what I am really done with is what, for DD2 and I, is a very one-sided nursing relationship. I "give" her my breast, she "takes" my milk, she is not very gentle, she doesn't settle in and relax and ooze love -- she just kind of gobbles at me, like my breast is a sandwich, like this is another food for her and it doesn't have anything to do with her love for her mommy. Does that make sense?
What gets me down sometimes about being really committed to CLW is that it seems to force a mama also to be really committed to total self-sacrifice with no way out. If you are 100% committed, there are no limits, no encouragement to take your relationship to the next level, etc. I love what CalBearMama said about teaching her DS to get up in the morning and find her -- that's an example of setting a gentle limit with a carrot instead of a stick -- but would probably fall under the category of mother-led-weaning and therefore somehow make her less than 100% committed to CLW. How about the idea of FLW -- "family led weaning?" This is where the nursing relationship ends eventually as a result of the needs and strengths of the entire family. It can be influenced (not forced) by a pregnancy or new baby, by a mama that feels "done" and wants to move on gently and help her child do so, by a mama who goes back to work, by a daddy who lives elsewhere who wants to have overnights, by any other number of parts of living in a group of people who ALL have needs. A newborn or baby should, in my opinion, get to be the one whose needs get absolute first consideration, but when you have a 3 or 4 or 5 year old, I think that child can be considered part of a group of people whose needs ALL must be met -- including the mama. Just my two cents. I'm not against CLW (and in fact love the idea) if everyone involved is happy! |
|
The thing is, part of following my daughter's lead in the past several months has been recognizing that she needs me to set more limits. She can't stand saying no to nursing and wants me to help her not nurse. It's a very personal and intimate, delicate balance. I'm the only one who can understand this fully, if that makes sense. Especially since the timing of my wanting to be done nursing has come at the same time I've realized she needs my help stopping. --Heather |
|
How about the idea of FLW -- "family led weaning?" This is where the nursing relationship ends eventually as a result of the needs and strengths of the entire family. It can be influenced (not forced) by a pregnancy or new baby, by a mama that feels "done" and wants to move on gently and help her child do so, by a mama who goes back to work, by a daddy who lives elsewhere who wants to have overnights, by any other number of parts of living in a group of people who ALL have needs. A newborn or baby should, in my opinion, get to be the one whose needs get absolute first consideration, but when you have a 3 or 4 or 5 year old, I think that child can be considered part of a group of people whose needs ALL must be met -- including the mama.
Just my two cents. I'm not against CLW (and in fact love the idea) if everyone involved is happy! |
I think it really fits my own philosophy on bf and weaning.
. I have been limiting 4.5 yo ds' nursing for a long time to only 3x per day (because I am also nursing his enthusiastic younger sister), but frankly I could easily see ds happily nursing until 9 yo if there was no discouragement or disapproval expressed by me or others
. A North American's idea of CLW might be very different from CLW in another culture where it's really No Big Deal to be nursing a child who is 5 or older. I don't really think that true CLW is an option for us because I don't want to be nursing a 9 yo. Am I allowed to say that in this forum
? My personal bias is that a 5 yo is "too old for nursing" -- for me. But I haven't decided what to do about it. I don't want to to be like "Happy Birthday, you're 5, say goodbye to nursing even though you really like it". It's really hard to sort through all the baggage. I only know one woman IRL who nursed a child older than 4 - and I don't know if she felt that great about it. Also, CLW during a pregnancy really is a much different scenario that CLW under other circumstances, IMO.
We will continue nursing until it isn't working for us anymore. Hopefully she will wean herself when she is ready.
But over time, was also pretty clear.
|
(once, when told "you can nurse when the sun is up" she yelled back "I hate the sun").
|





). Then I said no later than age 2. Well, at age 2 I was in full-time school and working, and I felt like nursing was the one thing that kept us connected when I was home. Plus I didn't have the energy to initiate weaning.



Follow Mothering