I firmly believe that pet cats should be kept indoors. Cats allowed to roam the neighborhood are at risk for disease, car accidents, attack by other animals. In many communities the same leash law that applies to dogs also applies to cats - but is rarely enforced.
Roaming cats kill wild birds, soil gardens and sandboxes, even kill trees (this happened to our neighbors - the cat scratched on a young tree so much that it stripped bark all the way around, killing the tree. The cat owners bought a new tree, but it was much smaller than the one that died).
Many people believe that cats "have" to go outside - that they will be miserable if they don't. My question is this: if a cat is miserable being kept as a pet in a home, is it really a suitable pet? I don't believe in keeping wild animals as pets, even small ones (racoons, skunks, squirrels). If a cat cannot be kept in a home, or taught to walk on a leash, is it a domestic animal or a wild animal? If it is a wild animal, it should not be kept as a pet at all. And since cats are not indigenous to the US, they should not be allowed to run wild here - letting them go is not "returning" them to the wild, as one might
To me, a pet is a domestic animal, not a wild animal that happens to be kept in captivity. It has been bred for many generations to live with people. sometimes there might be rare individuals who are more like their wild ancestors - for example, a dog who is extremely aggressive or dominant - and those individuals are not suitable pets for most people. There might be cats in that category as well, who simply cannot tlerate living in a house with people. But I find it hard ot believe that MOST cats fall into this category.
Roaming cats kill wild birds, soil gardens and sandboxes, even kill trees (this happened to our neighbors - the cat scratched on a young tree so much that it stripped bark all the way around, killing the tree. The cat owners bought a new tree, but it was much smaller than the one that died).
Many people believe that cats "have" to go outside - that they will be miserable if they don't. My question is this: if a cat is miserable being kept as a pet in a home, is it really a suitable pet? I don't believe in keeping wild animals as pets, even small ones (racoons, skunks, squirrels). If a cat cannot be kept in a home, or taught to walk on a leash, is it a domestic animal or a wild animal? If it is a wild animal, it should not be kept as a pet at all. And since cats are not indigenous to the US, they should not be allowed to run wild here - letting them go is not "returning" them to the wild, as one might
To me, a pet is a domestic animal, not a wild animal that happens to be kept in captivity. It has been bred for many generations to live with people. sometimes there might be rare individuals who are more like their wild ancestors - for example, a dog who is extremely aggressive or dominant - and those individuals are not suitable pets for most people. There might be cats in that category as well, who simply cannot tlerate living in a house with people. But I find it hard ot believe that MOST cats fall into this category.












Same thing with the patio. It's miserable in the summer.
Follow Mothering