Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › a little "gem" for you (out of OHIO, this time)...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

a little "gem" for you (out of OHIO, this time)...  

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
http://blog.cleveland.com/health/200...s_breastf.html

:

What next ?

"Infant formula is supplemented with vitamin D, so babies can make up for their low stores at birth."

Right. Because there's a reason, right there, to forget the whole breastfeeding thang, and just give formula instead.... riiiiiight.

"But local pediatricians are referring an increasing number of newborns and infants, mostly those who were exclusively breast-fed, to endocrinologists because of rickets."

Ooooh. Nice little jab here, too ! This is doing such a service to breastfeeding and the health of our world's infant population !

(please read : OODLES of sarcasm)

I also like how the endocrinologist admits, "It's a little skewed...." (re: the fact that she sees so many African-American and Middle-Eastern patients in her practice.... remembering, of course, that darker-skinned people are at a much greater risk for Vit D deficiency).

Yeah, it's a little skewed, indeed.

"Most parents are surprised when they learn what the problem is, particularly when the child has been breast-fed, because it seems that everything a baby needs should be in breast milk, doctors say."

You don't say, eh ? That everything a baby needs should be in breast milk ? And do doctors really say or believe this ? Not to my knowledge. If they DID, wouldn't they all be saying "to hell with those Vit D drops !" ?

"So babies are getting a double whammy -- not enough vitamin D from sun-shunning Mom's low stores before birth and then a poor source of vitamin D in breast milk."

Seems to me pretty evident that it's breastfeeding that is getting the "double whammy"/short end of the stick here.... as is any babe that may now potentially be denied his mama's milk for fear of the incredibly rare rickets, as a direct result of future parents reading this bunk-a$$, clearly biased article (and especially when prevention AND the cure is just so dang easy AND free --- hello ! SUNLIGHT !?!?).

Un-frickin'-believable.

Wow. Just WOW.

I am not going to be able to sleep tonight, thinking about the number of unsuspecting (uninformed...) parents who are going to read that article, and ultimately decide NOT to breastfeed.

Because I am not kidding myself. It will happen.

And Nestlé will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Seriously. It's this sort of thing that traumatizes me beyond belief....
I think I'm going to cry.
post #2 of 11
Wow. Just, wow. Speechless for now. will post more soon...wow
post #3 of 11
Wow, that really IS...awful.
post #4 of 11
yeah, wish they had made a bigger deal about the fact that babes get most of their vit. d from mama in the last few weeks of pregnancy -- which many mamas 'round here don't make it to because docs want to induce labor early because the babes are soo big (sarcasm). and of course, waiting for labor to start naturally is so inconvenient, i mean, what if those ob's have a vacation planned? :vomit
post #5 of 11
O-M-G. Wow. I am shaking right now, thinking about the babies who will be denied the best food they need because of this cr@ppy article.

How in the world has our species survived for so long if breastmilk is so inadequate? Hmmm.......
post #6 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tashaharney View Post
yeah, wish they had made a bigger deal about the fact that babes get most of their vit. d from mama in the last few weeks of pregnancy -- which many mamas 'round here don't make it to because docs want to induce labor early because the babes are soo big (sarcasm). and of course, waiting for labor to start naturally is so inconvenient, i mean, what if those ob's have a vacation planned? :vomit
Ohmygosh ! I just posted this exact same point on another discussion forum !



Great minds think alike. Too bad we don't write the articles for the Cleveland Post.

*sigh*
post #7 of 11
Speaking as a reporter, that article is jam-packed with loaded language. It would be nice if a health care professional from that area could write a letter to the editor.
post #8 of 11

Wtf?



okay, so i'm not going to look this up right now because i'm too P.O'd :

but isn't it the case that what vitamin D there is in breastmilk comes from the mama's own diet/exposure? that would make sense...

so if it's LOW in vitamin D, it's because mama is not getting enough vitamin D?

so it's not that breastmilk is deficient in vitamin D, it's that women are. that's a very fixable problem! (not to mention, a problem worthy of discussion in its own right, regardless of breastfeeding, because it's a women's health issue that women are so deficient in a majorly important vitamin!!!)

saying breastmilk is vitamin D deficient is like saying it's full of metamphetamine--it's not an intrinsic property of milk, it has to do with the mother's lifestyle!

and FWIW i've heard numerous places that most EVERYONE these days is vitamin D deficient, which is one reason why fish oil is such a great thing.

if these UA violations had not wasted resources printing this trumped up piece of work, maybe they could've written an informative article on how people can get enough vitamin D!!!
post #9 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickledeeboo View Post
Because I am not kidding myself. It will happen.

And Nestlé will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Seriously. It's this sort of thing that traumatizes me beyond belief....
I think I'm going to cry.
I am crying with you.

I am freakin flattened by this article. BY GODS they should issue an apology.

Can we do something about this?????
post #10 of 11
Wow. What a horrible article. More media hype telling us how our bodies are insufficient, according to "the experts". What a lousy article. Isn't it interesting how there are all of these breastfeeding jabs thrown in, and an obvious (however sloppy and inadequate) attempt to somehow downplay it by summing up with talking about inadequate sun exposure? It's like a weak job of subliminal messages or something. Arggggghhhh.
So infuriating.
post #11 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by mom4peace View Post
Isn't it interesting how there are all of these breastfeeding jabs thrown in, and an obvious (however sloppy and inadequate) attempt to somehow downplay it by summing up with talking about inadequate sun exposure? It's like a weak job of subliminal messages or something. Arggggghhhh.
So infuriating.
It is badly written article, as are most pieces done by our paper here. I'm pretty sure it's aimed at a 7th grade reading level, so it can't get too complicated or technical, or people won't understand. Same is true of our TV medical news reporters -- lots of half-truths and incomplete information.

Honestly though, it's either cloudy or snowing from November to April here in northeastern Ohio.. It really is depressingly dark. People who move to the area can't believe the lack of sunshine.

People here aren't getting the sun exposure they need during the winter. Especially when they don't know that they need to. Add to that all the induction-happy doctors in the area -- that's your double-whammy.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › a little "gem" for you (out of OHIO, this time)...