Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at Home and Beyond › S/O: If you ran a school ...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

S/O: If you ran a school ...  

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
Let's say for this thought experiment that you've been given ample resources and charged with the task of creating a small private school. The kids who will be attending the school do not have the option of homeschooling, for whatever reason. It can be experimental or unusual, but it has to be some kind of school building where children attend at regular hours. What would yours look like?
post #2 of 12
A broad range of ages in each group.

No more than 8-10 children per group.

Kids and parents pick together what classes the kids are going to take, with recommendations from the previous year's teachers.

A "classical" curriculum.

Wads of time spent outside. Lunch eaten outside on nice days. Long walks in the woods (which we could do since the classes are so small).

Half an hour free reading time after lunch. Drawing, painting, etc allowed for kids who don't feel like reading.

PE options like hiking, tae kwon do and yoga; along with the usual sports games.

Four periods per day rather than the standard six or seven.

Bi-weekly half-day field trips.

Weekly trips to a local library, instead of just having a little school library. Also having large numbers of books available for the kids to choose from during the week.

A monthly "volunteer day" where the entire school is out in the community.
post #3 of 12
I would run a Sudbury Valley model school. Period.
post #4 of 12
Classical/eclectic, with small multi age classrooms.
post #5 of 12
Thread Starter 
Warriorprincess, I just noticed your location.



I should write about my own fantasy school here when I have time. When I was a kid, I used to daydream about a school where the main feature was everyone sat on cushions and there were no desks! Now, I think I'd have to have a few desks, just for the kids who like them. But still mostly cushions.
post #6 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by phathui5 View Post
A broad range of ages in each group.

No more than 8-10 children per group.

Kids and parents pick together what classes the kids are going to take, with recommendations from the previous year's teachers.

A "classical" curriculum.

Wads of time spent outside. Lunch eaten outside on nice days. Long walks in the woods (which we could do since the classes are so small).

Half an hour free reading time after lunch. Drawing, painting, etc allowed for kids who don't feel like reading.

PE options like hiking, tae kwon do and yoga; along with the usual sports games.

Four periods per day rather than the standard six or seven.

Bi-weekly half-day field trips.

Weekly trips to a local library, instead of just having a little school library. Also having large numbers of books available for the kids to choose from during the week.

A monthly "volunteer day" where the entire school is out in the community.
I like!
post #7 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankgirl73 View Post
I would run a Sudbury Valley model school. Period.
Same here. Sudbury.

Lillian
post #8 of 12
Like the Small School Satish Kumar founded in Cornwall.
post #9 of 12
I'm not sure my ideal school could be a small school, because of all the resources I'd want it to have. It would be on a huge piece of land, with woods, fields, and some kind of water. There would be barns and livestock, a vegetable garden and orchard, trails for hiking, skiing and riding, an ice rink - and inside, there would be well-equipped science labs, art rooms, lots of computers, a gym, a big library, a woodshop, etc. etc.

It would serve kids from K-12, but they wouldn't be divided into grades. I think they'd spend part of each day with a "home room" group of other kids who were at roughly the same level. That time would be for introducing a wide range of interesting ideas and skills. The group might experiment with painting or pottery, go on a nature walk, try some creative writing exercises, spend a week (or a few weeks) studying some period in history, learn some math concepts . . . Kids would be encouraged to try whatever the teacher suggested, but nothing would be required, and no grades would be given.

Another part of the day would be for elective classes. Kids and their parents would decide what classes they should take - nothing except the home room period would be required (and kids who really wanted to could probably opt out of that, too.) There would be opportunities to study all the traditional academic stuff, and there would also be classes like dance, horseback riding, canoeing, or small engine repair. Some classes might have assignments students were required to complete if they wanted to stay in the class, but no grades would be given. The emphasis would be on learning and understanding, not on meeting the teacher's expectations.

Then there would be a big block of free time each day, when kids could do whatever they wanted - help take care of the horses or work in the vegetable garden, walk in the woods, work on the computers, try their own projects in the art room or science lab . . .
post #10 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by phathui5 View Post
A broad range of ages in each group.

No more than 8-10 children per group.

Kids and parents pick together what classes the kids are going to take, with recommendations from the previous year's teachers.

A "classical" curriculum.

Wads of time spent outside. Lunch eaten outside on nice days. Long walks in the woods (which we could do since the classes are so small).

Half an hour free reading time after lunch. Drawing, painting, etc allowed for kids who don't feel like reading.

PE options like hiking, tae kwon do and yoga; along with the usual sports games.

Four periods per day rather than the standard six or seven.

Bi-weekly half-day field trips.

Weekly trips to a local library, instead of just having a little school library. Also having large numbers of books available for the kids to choose from during the week.

A monthly "volunteer day" where the entire school is out in the community.

I like this... and I like Daffodil's because I truly believe that the kids are seriously not connected to the land anymore.

I would have them outside even when it snows.

I would also make sure that there was sufficient supervision to model appropriate, ethical and empathetic social interactions while still trying to ensure confidence, the ability to defend oneself and healthy debate.

I would actually impose group work, but I also know how to make sure that group work is WORK done by everyone in a group. No child would be allowed to work alone 100% of the time. I think working with others towards a common goal and commitment are dying skills. But this could be as simple as working together to plan the garden, etc.

Can't think of anything else at the moment...
post #11 of 12
[QUOTE=Daffodil;11036109]I'm not sure my ideal school could be a small school, because of all the resources I'd want it to have. It would be on a huge piece of land, with woods, fields, and some kind of water. There would be barns and livestock, a vegetable garden and orchard, trails for hiking, skiing and riding, an ice rink - and inside, there would be well-equipped science labs, art rooms, lots of computers, a gym, a big library, a woodshop, etc. etc.
QUOTE]

A "small school" isn't necessarily physically small, but has a small student population and a low teacher-student ratio.

What Satish Kumar did was to involve the entire community in the school. Gov't sponsored school in the area required kids to leave their small rural community and bus out to a very large comprehensive school every day from age 11 on. Kumar sold "subscriptions" to the school to raise money to buy a building (an old church) and every part of the school refurbishment and renovations involved the students, they did demolition, construction and decoration as part of their curriculum.

Any members of the community who has a special skill or area of interest were invited to teach in the school, it had one full-time teacher who acted more as a co-ordinator than a teacher. Kumar felt it was important for kids to know how things are made and where their stuff comes from, so they run their own community garden and kitchen, and kids rotate through, growing and preparing food for all the students, staff, and sometimes, for other community groups or large dinners. They spin and weave their own wool from local sheep and design their own clothes (they are required to do this once in the 4-6 years they are at the school, and can choose to keep doing it.)

They are taught to do building and vehicle repairs and maintain their own school themselves. Academics are taught, but are not considered more important than community involvement and life skills. They spend about 3 hours a day max on academics at a high school level (with a lot of academic stuff being picked up through carpentry, etc.)

The reason why it's called a Small School is that Kumar wanted to reverse the school-community equation, that the school serves and is an integral part of it's immediate community and that the community doesn't exist to serve the needs of the school. So every Small School would look somewhat different, since it would be a combination of the efforts, resources and needs of the immediate community it served.
post #12 of 12
When I was a kid, I was lucky enough to go to a 2 month sleepaway camp one summer. Ever since, I've fantasized about a school that would be based on the same model:

Each kid met with her counsellor at the beginning of camp, and made goals for what she wanted to learn that year. Together, they came up with a schedule for the first week, and then they tweaked it the beginning of each subsequent week.

There were two "required" subjects - swimming and horseback riding. For those two, each kid was tested and placed into a group of kids at the same ability level. (Age had nothing to do with placement - it was all about what you could do in the test.) Each kid's lessons in the required subjects were scheduled for a particular time each day (so you might have 10:00 swimming and 3:00 riding). The rest of the day could be filled in however you liked, but during each activity period (each was about an hour long, and there were 6 in a day) you had to go SOMEWHERE. I think once kids were 12 they could roam a little more freely, but younger kids were not allowed to just drift.

However, the activities themselves were, for the most part, not actual "lessons" - you could go to the arts & craft shack from 9 - 10 and throw a pot, or you could go to the library and look up birds, or you could go to the archery range and take a test to get a badge, or on and on and on. Some activities required certain instruction before you could participate - you had to learn basic gun safety before you were allowed to try target shooting - but no one would "make" you take the instruction if you weren't interested.

At each activity, there was a counsellor. When you went to a station, you checked in with the counsellor, and told him/her what you wanted to work on during that activity period. S/he helped you get started, gave instruction if wanted/needed, and then helped you evaluate how you did. There were achievement levels at each activity - some of which were necessary to earn greater responsibility (like you had to prove you could canoe a mile in order to be allowed to canoe to the picnic island), and some of which were basically for "bragging rights" (hey! I got my intermediate level in sailing!). Some kids were motivated by the levels more than others. I only got three badges all summer, but some kids got 20-30! Even so, it was not really a competition - everyone was working to reach or exceed her OWN goals. I just happen to be a kid that doesn't care about badges, but I still learned tons of new things.

The camp also did a wonderful job of fostering a real sense of community. Every day at meals, a rotating group of kids were responsible for "waiting" tables and leading songs. And periodically the whole camp would come together for an activity, a play, or a game. Also, woven in the traditions of the camp were mentoring opportunities for the older kids. Each 12 - 14yo was assigned 2 or 3 junior campers, as a "big sister". The big sisters would help orient the new kids, ease homesick little ones, and generally keep tabs on their little sisters.

Oh I could go on and on (can ya tell??) It was just such an ideal learning environment. I was a kinda timid kid, but I did things that summer that I never would have dreamed I could, because *I* was the one pushing me, instead of some grown-up!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Learning at Home and Beyond
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at Home and Beyond › S/O: If you ran a school ...