Quote:
Originally Posted by bellymama 
you sound like such a nice lady. 
we are talking about books that suck. to us. the thread title is "awful, awful childrens books"...right? so am i not supposed to be talking about the book i don't like? 
just calm down. 
|
Going back to the OP, no, I don't think this thread was supposed to be about "books that suck to us." And I don't think it was meant to be a "silly thread" as you categorized it. It started out looking at reasons why classic children's books might have morals or messages that don't fit with people's values today. The concerns were legitimate and the responses were often thoughtful. I doubt it was meant to degenerate into, "Oh, and So-and-So SUCKS because I personally don't like rhyming!" Honestly the thing that turned me off the most about your posts is that you said that an individual sucked. Not her books, but herself. That's just not cool.
Oh, and NYCVeg... no, that wasn't me talking about censorship. And I don't have a problem with everyone having their own tastes, but I hate for books to be labeled "awful" or "sucky" in a legitimate reasonable conversation just because they aren't something you personally enjoy. It is terribly juvenile. Now, give a REASON why they may be unacceptable (the wrong message for kids, violence, underlying racism, very scary, commercialistic, etc) and that's a true addition to the dialogue. The person who had issues w/ Pajama Time and the warthog, for instance, although I feel she was reading too much into it, had a legitimate concern. "Boynton sucks" is not, IMO, a legitimate concern, nor is it a valuable addition to any adult conversation.
Follow Mothering