Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › I don't know where this should go but it just pissed me off!
New Posts  All Forums:
 

I don't know where this should go but it just pissed me off! - Page 3

post #41 of 114
That's just horrible!

It's so irritating how they always use the "birth is messy" card to convince women not to give birth vaginally or at home. I've seen cesarean sections and they are FAR more bloody and messy than natural birth. I gave birth at home on a towel. Afterward, hubby just threw the towel in the wash, hit rinse, and washed it with the rest of the laundry. No big deal :
post #42 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by amberskyfire View Post
That's just horrible!

It's so irritating how they always use the "birth is messy" card to convince women not to give birth vaginally or at home. I've seen cesarean sections and they are FAR more bloody and messy than natural birth. I gave birth at home on a towel. Afterward, hubby just threw the towel in the wash, hit rinse, and washed it with the rest of the laundry. No big deal :
I know! Oozing abdominal wound doesn't sound all that tidy to me. I've seen women healing from Cesareans and uterine surgery, and it boggles me that it is seen as an easier, neater choice. What the heck is going on with vaginal births that that's the perception??? Are all hospital vaginal births explosive fluid filled body ripping horror shows?

Actually, they are. Episiotomies and purple pushing, talk of decelerating heartrates and "stuck baby"... the uncertainty and the unpredictability are seen as dangers, as messiness. It's that that folks are trying to avoid, rather than a fear of bodily fluid or of fallen bladders - Because there is definitely the same fluids involved in a Cesarean, plus a couple of others along the way, and Cesareans lead to just as much, if not more, pelvic prolapse as vaginal birth - plus adhesions, which isn't a threat with vag birth.


And women really aren't aware of the risks. The fact that Cesarean quadruples a woman's risk of dying after giving birth is either not known or considered exaggerated... less problematic and less likely things like"stuck/big baby" is still a greater concern, because that's what's hyped, that's what the drs sell them. Not lies... but half-truths that serve their overall purpose rather than exactly what's best for mama and baby.
post #43 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joezmom View Post
IRL most women seem to be satisfied with their hospital births, or wouldn't we see HB rates increasing by leaps and bounds?
No. Most women that I have heard talk about their birth experience are dissatisfied (at best) but think that is what they have to put up with in order to have a live baby. This, in part, is why elective c-sec rates are so astronomical. If women are thinking that major surgery, and healing from such while mothering a newborn, is a preferable choice to vaginal birth in a hospital... how bad have things gotten?
post #44 of 114
So.....why don't more women birth at home?
post #45 of 114
Because most women don't even know that homebirth is an option. And most that do know are so convinced that they and their baby will die without modern medicine, that they don't even consider it as an option.

Of course homebirth is not for everyone. But it could be for many, many more women if only there was more knowledge about and validation for it.
post #46 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by feminine_earth View Post
Because most women don't even know that homebirth is an option.
: I had never even heard of homebirth when I was pregnant with my first. I didn't even know people still "did that." Then, after I had the textbook hospital experience complete with C-section, I dug a little deeper than the mainstream books I'd been reading and learned a WHOLE lot. I felt like screaming, "Why didn't anyone tell meee?!?!"

The info is there, but you have to actively go searching for it, and most women don't even know how to do that. They just go see their friendly neighborhood OB, do what he says, and show up at the hospital when it's time. Because that's "how it's done." And I'm not damning them for not knowing any better, because I was once a mom who did things because that's "how it's done." It takes a LOT for us pack-mentality humans to break free and think outside the box!

And let's not forget that just because homebirth rates are practically nonexistent in the U.S. doesn't mean that it's not a very favorable choice in other countries. In TBOBB I believe they quoted the Netherlands as having a 30% homebirth rate!
post #47 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joezmom View Post
So.....why don't more women birth at home?
Because it has been pounded into their heads that birth is dangerous, in fact if it isn't fatal at home it's a miracle.

Fear is a powerful tool.
post #48 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyastara View Post
Because it has been pounded into their heads that birth is dangerous, in fact if it isn't fatal at home it's a miracle.

Fear is a powerful tool.
Exactly. Like a pp said it truely isn't for everyone, but many women are simply brainwashed that if you are birthing outside a hospital that's crazy and dangerous and "what if something happened?" Women hear of (or see) birth stories that are usually filled with interventions and in the end docs get the credit for "saving the baby's life." Talking of non-emergency situations here....situations that are pretty much routine now. Once they see and hear these stories they get freaked out understandably and don't even think twice about going to a hospital. Also, many women want epis and you can't have those at home.
post #49 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joezmom View Post
I haven't seen any study by Odent regarding oxytocin and better/easier bonding - just his opinion. Can you cite?
The reason you haven't seen any study by Odent is because he doesn't do studies. He reads studies and reports their implications.

And yes, I can cite. I'm not going to for two reasons: first, there are literally hundreds of studies, and I don't know which ones you're likely to find relevant or convincing for your own purposes. Two, I'm a little irritated that you come in here guns blazing and make absolutist statements ("Michel Odent has no facts to back up his claims" and "pure woo") when clearly you haven't done a lick of work to actually find out whether this is true (because if you had you would know that it is not.) Given that attitude, which feels awfully trollish, I'm not going to put myself out to do your work for you. Do an internet search for "oxytocin" and "bonding", and then go to Blackwell-Synergy and do the same search, and maybe PubMed while you're at it.

Finally, Odent did not invent the idea, and he is certainly not the only one drawing these conclusions. As well as we can know that anything is scientifically true, we know that hormones affect feelings and behavior. Common sense would dictate that the more hormones flooding through ones system, then, the more of an effect. This holds true for falling in love, ecstatic sex, and spiritual experiences. And the time when a woman is most flooded in the hormones of ecstasy is at birth, as long as nothing has inhibited that hormonal release. The activity of the neocortex suppresses the activity of the mammalian brain and therefore hormonal release. Oxytocin has been implicated as the "hormone of love", although it does other things too. It's not the only hormone involved in bonding. Beta-endorphins act as an opiate, and opiates create a state of feeling of dependency -- a longing for the loved one. There's also prolactin, "the mothering hormone", which engenders nurturing behaviors. These levels normally (i.e. if not inhibited) peak at birth and the hour or so following, and then begin to fall off. Oxytocin and prolactin are both produced with breastfeeding, which is why breastfeeding is important for continued bonding.

Quote:
I don't intend to insult, and while the term 'abuse' may mean different things to people, *I* don't equate the term with apathy, insensitivity or ignorance. If I DID, then I might feel abused (instead of just insulted!) by some previous PP's comments about unnatural birth.
I didn't say that I equate abuse with apathy, insensitivity, or ignorance. What I said was that these things create conditions that make is far easier for abuse to occur.

Quote:
Oh, I would call it an episiotomy.
Cute. So let me rephrase: I consider it abusive to cut a woman's genitals unnecessarily.
post #50 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joezmom View Post
So.....why don't more women birth at home?
Years & years of being convinced that birth is a bad/horrible/messy/dangerous experience. Watch discovery health channel & shows like Birth Story, a Baby story, etc and almost all of them are "emergency" situations. Tell someone the sky is purple all their lives and they will believe it is purple.

Add to that many women don't even know about other options. Some women don't even think to question their doctors at all. "This is what has to happen" is the WORD, end of story. I think as other options become more noticed, there will be a rise in these other options.
post #51 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by laoxinat View Post
. Michel Odent has been a birth advocate very likely longer than you've been alive. I think he knows of what he speaks.
Uh, isn't he also the guy who think men should be barred from ever seeing their babies being born?

And I second the woo. I bonded quite quickly and easily with my NICU baby. If anything I felt more bonded to him b/c we had to fight to be together.
post #52 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by LotusBirthMama View Post
Uh, isn't he also the guy who think men should be barred from ever seeing their babies being born?
Why, yes, yes he was. Article
post #53 of 114
no woman should be allowed to choose a cs. elective cs should be against the law. unless there is a real med or psych reason it should never be an option. I am so sick of this too posh to push thing an doc's CYA attitude. Enough is enough.
post #54 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyastara View Post
It isn't crazy, it is physiological. I wish that it weren't taboo, but it makes people very defensive. If I say anything negative about my (homebirth transfer) c-sec, I get people coming out of the woodwork to defend their c-secs whether they were planned or not. Or people who were born c-sec, now adults, and are "just fine". Well, of course they are just fine, but there is a loss there which I wish could be acknowledged.
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile7393
After reading Odent's books, I amazed that everything he says is all opinion and nothing backed up.
Really? What books of his have you read? The only one that I can think of that doesn't list sources is Birth Reborn, which is just an account of the making of a birth clinic.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joezmom
I guess my peeve is the insistance that a homebirth or UC is somehow 'better' than a birth center or hospital birth.
Are you similarly peeved that most people insist that hospital birth is better than homebirth? Because really, the homebirth movement is much more tolerant of the choice to birth in the hospital than the other way around. From homebirth advocates you'll hear a lot of, "Yes, sometimes medicalized birth is necessary and sometimes institutionalized birth is prudent, and in any case a woman should birth where she feels most supported and comfortable." From most doctors and most of mainstream society you'll hear, "Homebirth is dangerous, foolish, and selfish! Do you want your baby to DIE?"

I really don't understand why you feel the need to come here and complain that some people think homebirth is best for them. What is it to you? That their choice is different from yours is not inherently a condemnation of your choice. Trust me.

Quote:
So.....why don't more women birth at home?
Why don't more people recycle? Why do people continue to buy crap food to put in their bodies? Why do people hit their kids? Why do they whine about poor people getting socialized assistance, but seem oblivious to the astronomically higher cost of corporate welfare? Why do people stay in abusive relationships? Why do women accept our culture's claim they aren't valuable unless they look like the photoshopped women in the magazines, buy all the latest fashions, and have vaginas that smell pretty? Why do people go along with the school system's enforcement of meaningless busywork and uesless rote memorization and teaching to the test and yet more busywork to do at home because six hours a day clearly isn't enough? Why is there an epidemic of postpartum depression, hell, depression in general in this society? Why do people unquestioningly let themselves be led to be a cog in the wheel that leads to the depression? Why why why why? Gee, I don't know... because there's such a thing as herd behavior? Because most people are terrified of rocking the boat, of not fitting in, of being ostracized? So many people are not really happy in their lives, and they know it probably has something to do with doing meaningless work and self-medicating with meaningless activities. And yet they just keep on doing what they're told.

Sure, some women do the research and they make a very careful choice to birth in the place they believe is best for them, which is sometimes a hospital. If the general trends evident in internet forums and the media could be said to be representative of the majority, most are just getting in line like lemmings, without really having thought about it. Most people I've met in my life -- that I've met from living in a middle class suburb to inner city, in a variety of schooling and social and work environments -- have been scared to question the opinion of any authority figure. Choices outside of the mainstream are routinely vilified simply because they threaten the status quo, and backed up with arguments riddled with logical fallacies like implying that someone's ego or perception of them as wise has anything to do with the validity of the information itself (because there is nothing better to base them on.) This is just social pyschology.

Quote:
Obviously there is room for improvement in the hospital, but (I believe) Fyrestorm's horrific story is not the norm - she even managed to settle a lawsuit with a hospital and everyone involved - how rare is that?
Successful lawsuits are exceedingly rare, because juries are made up of the general public, and the general public still believes in the sacred godhood of the medical establishment. I have a good friend who was given an episiotomy, not for a medical reason as the baby's vitals were great, against her consent. In fact, she was screaming at the doctor "I do not consent" and he did it anyway. After months of depression and shame and incontinence and inability to have sex without pain, she consulted a lawyer, and was told that it wasn't a winnable case, because 1) she had put herself under this doctor's care and signed consent forms for whatever medical procedures he found "necessary", and 2) because episiotomy is still considered by many people to be not only not a big deal, but a good thing. It protects the pelvic floor, dontcha know. Stories like this are all over MDC. They're also all over the more mainstream boards, only the women telling those stories still believe that their episiotomies were necessary, and whatever other degrading and damaging things were done to them, and so they suppress their suffering. There are really efficient coping mechanisms for those who can't afford to be raging against the terrible acts committed against them, either because it's too emotionally painful or because they know that those around them would not support it.
post #55 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by LotusBirthMama View Post
Why, yes, yes he was. Article
Actually, no he wasn't. Please read this thread: http://www.mothering.com/discussions...d.php?t=881682
post #56 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourlittlebirds View Post
I really don't understand why you feel the need to come here and complain that some people think homebirth is best for them. What is it to you? That their choice is different from yours is not inherently a condemnation of your choice. Trust me.
This. I was just saying on a different forum yesterday that not every positive statement needs to be met with a negative one just because you'd make (or made) a different choice. It's OKAY. And....

Quote:
Why don't more people recycle? Why do people continue to buy crap food to put in their bodies? Why do people hit their kids? Why do they whine about poor people getting socialized assistance, but seem oblivious to the astronomically higher cost of corporate welfare? Why do people stay in abusive relationships? Why do women accept our culture's claim they aren't valuable unless they look like the photoshopped women in the magazines, buy all the latest fashions, and have vaginas that smell pretty? Why do people go along with the school system's enforcement of meaningless busywork and uesless rote memorization and teaching to the test and yet more busywork to do at home because six hours a day clearly isn't enough? Why is there an epidemic of postpartum depression, hell, depression in general in this society? Why do people unquestioningly let themselves be led to be a cog in the wheel that leads to the depression? Why why why why? Gee, I don't know... because there's such a thing as herd behavior? Because most people are terrified of rocking the boat, of not fitting in, of being ostracized? So many people are not really happy in their lives, and they know it probably has something to do with doing meaningless work and self-medicating with meaningless activities. And yet they just keep on doing what they're told.
I think I'm in love with you now. Marry me?
post #57 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by LotusBirthMama View Post
And I second the woo. I bonded quite quickly and easily with my NICU baby. If anything I felt more bonded to him b/c we had to fight to be together.
So. You feel you experienced adequate or ideal bonding under adverse circumstances, and therefore there can be no connection for anyone at all between hormones and bonding. That seems reasonable and logical to you, does it?

Really, has anyone anywhere ever said that bonding is entirely dependent on one factor? Because I must have missed that. Everything I've read about bonding makes crystal clear that humans have evolved complex and often remarkably effective social and mental workarounds for disturbances to early physiological bonding. It's also obvious that individuals are differently affected by different circumstances. People have different body chemistries, different mental states, different levels of sensitivity and resiliency. It's not black and white, where we can just say, "oh, nobody will bond at all at the hospital and everyone will bond perfectly at home." Aside from the fact that actual experience does not bear this out, it's just absurdly simplistic. Which is why no one is saying it. What people are saying is that it's a factor, with the significance and degree of its effect dependent on the individual.

And, if you believe that the hormonal process really does have nothing to do with bonding, what then do you conclude about women who do have difficulty bonding with their babies? Are they just bad people? Do they really just not want their babies bad enough? I had difficulty bonding with my firstborn and to varying other degree with another two out of my four children (who were all, incidently, born at home.) I guess there's just something wrong with me, huh?
post #58 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by barefootpoetry View Post
I think I'm in love with you now. Marry me?
Now, now, none of that. Because that might inflate my ego, which would certainly invalidate all my arguments.

(You are a sweetheart, thank you. )
post #59 of 114
oh my goodness, i hope there doesn't come a time "when mothers make the vaginal-or-caesarean decision in the same way many now make the breast-or-bottle decision", although in some parts of the world, it's too late to say that.
post #60 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourlittlebirds View Post
Yes.




and have vaginas that smell pretty?
i know this is off-topic but could you explain what you're referring to for me? thanks
New Posts  All Forums:
 
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Birth and Beyond
Mothering › Mothering Discussion Forums › Pregnancy and Birth › Birth and Beyond › I don't know where this should go but it just pissed me off!