I have searched past posts and can't find any really helpful insight. Forgive me if I have missed it. I am sure someone has asked this!
My 41 yo dh has not had the pox and we recently had him tested. He showed no immunity. I need to expose my kids but we are concerned about dh. Basically, I think my choices are 1) do nothing and risk him getting it (maybe it isn't bad but maybe it is quite severe), 2) do nothing but avoid the kids while contagious (he could still get it), 3) get the vax (both doses for an adult), or 4) get one dose of the vax and hope for partial immunity. In that case he might or might not get it when the kids are contagious but it would most likely be a milder case. The problem w/ that is that every 10 years or so we would retest and then decide if he needed a booster or if we should continue to risk exposure.
Any thoughts?
My 41 yo dh has not had the pox and we recently had him tested. He showed no immunity. I need to expose my kids but we are concerned about dh. Basically, I think my choices are 1) do nothing and risk him getting it (maybe it isn't bad but maybe it is quite severe), 2) do nothing but avoid the kids while contagious (he could still get it), 3) get the vax (both doses for an adult), or 4) get one dose of the vax and hope for partial immunity. In that case he might or might not get it when the kids are contagious but it would most likely be a milder case. The problem w/ that is that every 10 years or so we would retest and then decide if he needed a booster or if we should continue to risk exposure.
Any thoughts?









. I totally agree w/ your statement. That is why it is so difficult. Both sides are emphatic but I am not completely pursueded by either one. I've been spending a lot of time reading links from