I just got a letter from Aetna, my insurer. This is the second of its kind. It encloses a couple of "informational" items including a letter addressed to "Dear Aetna Member" and congratulating the recipient on becoming a new parent.
"Philips AVENT has teamed up with Aetna to offer you a limited time offer during this special time." It goes on to say that AVENT makes the "first feeding bottle clinically shown to reduce colic." It then offers a pack of 8 bottles, some pacis, and related items at a discount.
I have no problem with bottles, per se, and nowhere does it suggest offering formula, but it also does not suggest offering breastmilk (or that breastmilk - ideally from the BREAST - is optimal), and refers to a study that "At 2 weeks of age, babies fed with the AVENT bottle showed a trend to less colic than babies fed with a conventional bottle..." Clearly the study was based on formula fed babies and yet implies that the bottles can reduce colic for ALL babies, which is ridiculous on several levels.
The implication that all babies should use bottles, let alone at 2w old is also inappropriate in that it does not promote breastfeeding, IMO, especially since it appears to be endorsed by the health insurance company, which many people believe, however erroneously, has their and their babies' best interests at heart. I'm no expert, but IMO, any new mommy that is misled to think that their otherwise healthy, nursing, newborn should be taking bottles regularly by 2w has a decent chance of negatively affecting their BFing relationship.
Thoughts?
"Philips AVENT has teamed up with Aetna to offer you a limited time offer during this special time." It goes on to say that AVENT makes the "first feeding bottle clinically shown to reduce colic." It then offers a pack of 8 bottles, some pacis, and related items at a discount.
I have no problem with bottles, per se, and nowhere does it suggest offering formula, but it also does not suggest offering breastmilk (or that breastmilk - ideally from the BREAST - is optimal), and refers to a study that "At 2 weeks of age, babies fed with the AVENT bottle showed a trend to less colic than babies fed with a conventional bottle..." Clearly the study was based on formula fed babies and yet implies that the bottles can reduce colic for ALL babies, which is ridiculous on several levels.
The implication that all babies should use bottles, let alone at 2w old is also inappropriate in that it does not promote breastfeeding, IMO, especially since it appears to be endorsed by the health insurance company, which many people believe, however erroneously, has their and their babies' best interests at heart. I'm no expert, but IMO, any new mommy that is misled to think that their otherwise healthy, nursing, newborn should be taking bottles regularly by 2w has a decent chance of negatively affecting their BFing relationship.
Thoughts?










