Has anyone heard of this concept? Do you know the reasoning behind it? I've seen it mentioned in a couple of places where a pitocin induced labor has stalled out.
Also, is there a reason one wouldn't just turn off the pitocin and send the woman home to wait a few days if dilation wasn't happening as expected? Assuming the waters aren.... oh yeah, right, with induced labors they "have" to put in an internal monitor and therefore the waters "have" to be broken. But if they didn't do that, would there be a reason, in a non-emergency situation, not to say "this isn't working, let's try again another time"?
Also, is there a reason one wouldn't just turn off the pitocin and send the woman home to wait a few days if dilation wasn't happening as expected? Assuming the waters aren.... oh yeah, right, with induced labors they "have" to put in an internal monitor and therefore the waters "have" to be broken. But if they didn't do that, would there be a reason, in a non-emergency situation, not to say "this isn't working, let's try again another time"?










:

