Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › My letter to Ask Amy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

My letter to Ask Amy  

post #1 of 16
Thread Starter 
I can't find the original column where she told a prospective grandmother it was ok to ask her bf DIL to leave the room to nurse... but here's my letter to her about it:

Dear Amy,

Your recent advice to the grandmother who wrote about her intention to relegate a breastfeeding mother to a back bedroom to protect the feelings of those who were “uncomfortable” with breastfeeding was terrible.

The relatively low rates of breastfeeding (especially for babies 12 months and older) in the United States represent a failure to give children the best start to life. Breastfeeding has a life-long impact on both mother and child, in terms of healthy immune system, fewer allergies, and healthier adult weight for breastfed children (to name just a few) and lowered cancer rates and better bone density for mothers who have breastfed. Discouraging a woman from breastfeeding (which requiring her to leave the room every time her child needs to nurse certainly does) supports a prejudice at the expense of women and their children.

The grandmother should support and encourage the new mother in her choice to breastfeed and make her welcome wherever she chooses to nurse. If other family members or friends are uncomfortable, they can either leave the room themselves or re-examine their prejudice against breastfeeding. I have breastfed my children into toddlerhood discreetly and without fanfare in any number of places: church, the zoo, the playground, grocery stores, in the offices of my graduate school faculty, the library, and in the presence of my husband’s elderly grandparents. When my first child was a newborn, they were clearly not accustomed to being around nursing mothers and likely expected me to cloister myself when I nursed. Instead, I nursed publicly, using a baby sling or a blanket for additional coverage. I was always discreet but never excused myself from the room. By the time my second child was a toddler, they had literally ceased to notice when he nursed; they didn’t see breastfeeding, they only saw their bright, sweet great-grandchildren.

Prejudice against breastfeeding discourages women from nursing and has a significant negative impact on children’s and women’s health. Rather than honoring a prejudice which could harm her grandchild, the woman who wrote to you should do everything she can to make the new mother comfortable and should demonstrate to her friends and family that times have changed. Amy, I hope you rethink your answer.

Sincerely,

[Penelope's IRL name]
post #2 of 16
good letter, well phrased...way to go!
post #3 of 16
That was an excellent letter.
post #4 of 16
Great letter!
post #5 of 16
Thread Starter 
Thanks! I'm so much more hard-assed about it IRL - not especially modest or discreet, yk? But Ask Amy doesn't need to know that.
post #6 of 16
interesting that the letter written to her originally is not even in the lastest columns, huh? i guess she got a huge amount of emails about that one.
post #7 of 16
OK...here's my letter to Amy. Don't mean to hijack, but didn't want to start a new thread on the same topic...

Dear Amy,

In your June 5th column, you advised a mother-in-law who was uncomfortable with her daughter-in-law nursing her child in public. Your advice can be summarized as follows: first, you told the woman that she should congratulate her daughter-in-law for giving the child the best possible nutrition, then you advised her to remind her daughter-in-law that “a deal is a deal” and that she was well within her rights to object to any activity that made her feel uncomfortable in her own home.

Your first piece of advice is perfect. However, your second is off-the-mark. In nearly every other scenario I might have wholeheartedly agreed with you. But not in this case, and here’s why—by telling the mother-in-law that she could ask her daughter-in-law to stick to their agreement, you are, in effect, agreeing that the daughter-in-law is engaging in objectionable behavior. In fact, she isn’t. She is feeding her baby—plain and simple.

Let me offer you an alternate situation. If a homophobic reader asked you about the best way to respond if the sight of two men being affectionate offended them, would you tell them that it would be fine to ask the gay couple to remove themselves? Of course not, regardless of whether or not they were on the street or in a private home, the hang-up would be with the reader and not with the couple. It’s very much the same with the mother-in-law. It is her perception that needs modifying, not her daughter-in-law’s behavior.

If I were in the position to give advice to this woman, I would suggest that she spend MORE time with nursing mothers. Because, as anyone who as ever nursed a child or who has ever spent a significant time in the presence of a nursing mother knows, it just simply is not that big a deal. In fact, a nursing pair often gives off such “good vibes,” the mother-in-law might actually find it pleasant to be around.

Sincerely,
post #8 of 16
Great letters! I hope a follow up is printed in the column.
post #9 of 16
I like both letters, too! I read that column. My opinion of Ask Amy isn't too high. I didn't think her 'advice' made sense in the first place. I think most of her advice is pretty useless. : I'll be looking for these letters in print!
post #10 of 16
Great letters! Thank you.
post #11 of 16
I think the first letter was pitch perfect but the second...to compare nourishing a baby at the breast to consensual adult public displays of affection is downright objectionable.

It's right up there with those eejits who talk about masturbation, urination and defecation as being normal body functions in a discussion about breastfeeding, but they refrain from doing that in public.

We can choose as adults not to kiss, cuddle, hold hands, fondle and fumble etc with out SO's, in an environment where it'll make others uncomfortable (gay, straight or otherwise) but a hungry baby needs fed!
post #12 of 16
Eejit? Isn't that a bit harsh?
I'm sorry that you found my analogy so objectionable...I didn't mean to offend or set back lactivism back in any way. It was not my intent to actually compare breastfeeding with PDAs, I was just trying to point out the flaw in the way Amy dispensed her advice.

Please write Ask Amy a better letter then, rather than judge mine.
post #13 of 16
Great letters...
post #14 of 16
Quote:
I think the first letter was pitch perfect but the second...to compare nourishing a baby at the breast to consensual adult public displays of affection is downright objectionable.


I think from an objectors point of view the comparison was viable - in the respect that it was the onlookers reaction being compared, not the situation they observed.


Approaching it from their pov if you can is one way to make things clearer to an objecting person. Just because WE understand that the situations aren't technically comparable doesn't mean it can't be used effectively to clarify the issue from a place the listener might more readily identify with.
post #15 of 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by frogautumn View Post
Eejit? Isn't that a bit harsh?
I'm sorry that you found my analogy so objectionable...I didn't mean to offend or set back lactivism back in any way. It was not my intent to actually compare breastfeeding with PDAs, I was just trying to point out the flaw in the way Amy dispensed her advice.

Please write Ask Amy a better letter then, rather than judge mine.


Sorry Frog, the 'eejit' was a description of those people who use defecation etc as examples of normal body functions that should be kept private as a comparison to breastfeeding NOT you.

I didn't mean to offend you at all, sorry if I was terse.

I just don't agree that the feeding of a baby can be compared with two folk snogging and grabbing each others butts. I understand the analogy of discomfort but it's (to flog a dead horse... phrase wise) apples to oranges.


Quote:
I think from an objectors point of view the comparison was viable - in the respect that it was the onlookers reaction being compared, not the situation they observed.
I understand but in my mind, illustrating an example of social discomfort with a behaviour what many perceive as deviant to start off with and linking that in the readers mind with a normal and natural one doesn't necessarily further the cause positively.


Quote:
Approaching it from their pov if you can is one way to make things clearer to an objecting person. Just because WE understand that the situations aren't technically comparable doesn't mean it can't be used effectively to clarify the issue from a place the listener might more readily identify with.
I imagine if anyone is uptight enough a mother breastfeeding their baby to demand they remove themselves to a private place, they'd probably have a conniption at the sight of two blokes kissing and be after them with the nearest heavy object!

My letter would be simple and to the point:

Dear Granny to be
Get over yourself. Be thankful your daughter in law is a selfless and dedicated enough mother to nourish and nurture your grandbaby the way nature intended. Be proud and supportive of her breastfeeding.

If you dare to banish this poor woman to the spare room to nurse the child, I'm going to send Big Ron round to sort you out.
post #16 of 16
I love the first letter. I think i'll print it out and use it to start up good conversation with my family.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › My letter to Ask Amy