Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › The Mindful Home › Natural Body Care › Johnson and Johnson Baby Soap
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Johnson and Johnson Baby Soap - Page 2  

post #21 of 39
Here's a website to check the safety of baby products: Hi ladies!

http://cosmeticsdatabase.com/special...php?nothanks=1
post #22 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by holothuroidea View Post
...and the chemists go

If you have J&J stuff left over from other babies or given to you as a gift, use it. You are much more likely to suffer from the effects of "bad chemicals" from the air you breath and the water you bathe yourself in than that soap.

NO soap or detergent is "natural" by what seems to be the definition of natural around here. Especially detergent. All detergents are synthetic by definition, and so are soaps. Soaps usually contain less additives and stabilizers, though.

If you are concerned about sensitive baby skin, use something fragrance free.

This is the perspective of someone who can not only pronounce all the ingredients on the J&J bottle, but knows what they are.

Just because you can pronounce the ingredients doesn't make it safer. I mean, you know what poison ivy is, right?


I mean, please tell me why you feel better about Decyl Polyglucose than Sodium Lauryl Sulfate?
bolding mine. I beg to differ. We use Dr. Bronner's Baby Mild soap on the whole family. here's a list of ingredients from their website:

INGREDIENTS:
Water, Saponfied Organic Coconut Oil*, Saponified Organic Olive Oil*, Organic Glycerin, Organic Cannabis Sativa (Hemp) Seed Oil, Organic Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Citric Acid, Tocopherol (Vit. E), * Certified Fair Trade by IMO

i don't use detergents or soaps when at all possible. i don't think all the chemicals are necessarily harmful, but i also don't think they're at all necessary so i don't see the point in exposing myself or my family to them for no particular reason when there are plenty of alternatives.

I get a gallon of the Bronner's through a local frontier coop. it costs $29 and not only does my family of 5 use it for hair and body washing, i use it for hand soap, and dilute it for cleaning, and a gallon lasts about 9 months. so i find it quite affordable. plus buying it by the gallon saves on packaging i then have to recycle.

as for the whole 'natural' thing... i don't really think it's a false claim, at least not in the case of Dr. Bronner's. i mean natural, by definition, would be something found in nature, right? so, for example, coconuts are found in nature. as far as i'm aware, sodium lauryl sulfate is not. and people have been using these natural oils both externally and ingesting as food for thousands of years - i feel a bit safer with those odds than with something man-made which has been around for a fraction of that time, and just because no one has yet proven a chemical's harmful doesn't mean that 100 years from now people won't be saying they can't believe we ever thought it was safe.

why expose yourself when there are reasonable alternatives? that's what i don't get. and i'm not sure why you'd be surprised that a Natural Family Living community, as we are "around here," would be seeking natural alternatives to mainstream decidedly unnatural products?!
post #23 of 39
In keeping with the DDC Guidelines, I am moving this thread to natural body care. I am also declaring a moratorium on snark.
post #24 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixiepunk View Post
bolding mine. I beg to differ. We use Dr. Bronner's Baby Mild soap on the whole family. here's a list of ingredients from their website:

INGREDIENTS:
Water, Saponfied Organic Coconut Oil*, Saponified Organic Olive Oil*, Organic Glycerin, Organic Cannabis Sativa (Hemp) Seed Oil, Organic Simmondsia Chinensis (Jojoba) Seed Oil, Citric Acid, Tocopherol (Vit. E), * Certified Fair Trade by IMO

...

as for the whole 'natural' thing... i don't really think it's a false claim, at least not in the case of Dr. Bronner's. i mean natural, by definition, would be something found in nature, right?

why expose yourself when there are reasonable alternatives? that's what i don't get. and i'm not sure why you'd be surprised that a Natural Family Living community, as we are "around here," would be seeking natural alternatives to mainstream decidedly unnatural products?!
That is exactly the definition of natural I am using. SOAP is not found in nature. Coconuts, yes-- saponified coconut oil, no. In fact, the sodium hydroxide (lye) they use to saponify the coconut oil is also not found in nature (its close cousin, potash, is). Its a chemical reaction of human origin, and there is no avoiding that.

Also HOW do you think they get the oil out of that coconut? I'm sure they use a very strong solvent to distill it. I'm also pretty sure that solvent is carcinogenic or at least very dangerous (ether, methylene chloride).

Furthermore, your soap contains a synthetic version of Vitamin E. I'm not very familiar with the synthesis of these molecules (tocopherol), but I do know that it does not occur in nature on its own and we need to synthesize it to get it by itself (you can't extract it, for example, even though an extraction is a decidedly unnatural process as well).

But that's not the problem with soaps, the problem is additives. There is no reason to expose yourself when there are reasonable alternatives. Problem is, sometimes those alternatives are not available for people. In the case of soap, it's easy to find a product with no additives (and your soap sounds very nice aside from the Vit. E additive). Detergents (liquid soaps), however, MUST contain additives in order for the product to work correctly.

Even if I wasn't using such a strict definition of natural I would still be able to say with certainty that there's false advertisement in the "natural" products world. There are a lot of things marketed as natural, which are not by any means natural. California Baby wash is an example of that. People make a fortune doing this and I don't think it's right.
post #25 of 39
California Baby isn't the worst out there, even with their parabens, not the best either, but not the worst.

And no, not everything in nature is good for your skin (never seen a product with poison ivy in it however I have seen plenty with witch hazel and other strong astringents). Not everything chemical is bad for your skin. And even though I can pronounce the ingredients in J&J products and I know what they are (very easy to find out exactly what they are and what they do and know that not everything in them is bad) I'm still not interested in their products but prefer more natural alternatives, like the Dr. Bronner's soap.
post #26 of 39
I guess it really depends on your ideas about personal products, too...if animal testing is a concern for you, or animal products in the soaps. Ivory is 99.9(9?)% pure, very few ingredients, but it has tallow in it.

I got a bar of unscented glycerine soap at our natural mkt for $1.99, so perhaps that's an option for you. As far as kid/baby soaps we use the California baby on the littlest one, and Nature's Gate on the older 3. Nature's Gate is not "perfect" but it's got somewhat fewer objectionable ingredients and is $4.99 on sale for a pretty large bottle -- I just looked and it's 18 fl oz. I may try something else next, but for now that's working well for 9 yo, 6yo and 2 yo hair.
post #27 of 39
Quote:
Here's a website to check the safety of baby products: Hi ladies!

http://cosmeticsdatabase.com/special...php?nothanks=1
I second searching through this database for any product you're unsure about. I personally just switched out the bottle of Aveeno baby wash with a bar of handmade soap and my dh hardly even noticed. He just uses whatever is there.
post #28 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by hmkrueger View Post
I guess it really depends on your ideas about personal products, too...if animal testing is a concern for you, or animal products in the soaps. Ivory is 99.9(9?)% pure, very few ingredients, but it has tallow in it.
I got a bar of unscented glycerine soap at our natural mkt for $1.99, so perhaps that's an option for you. As far as kid/baby soaps we use the California baby on the littlest one, and Nature's Gate on the older 3. Nature's Gate is not "perfect" but it's got somewhat fewer objectionable ingredients and is $4.99 on sale for a pretty large bottle -- I just looked and it's 18 fl oz. I may try something else next, but for now that's working well for 9 yo, 6yo and 2 yo hair.
bolding mine... excellent point. those 'no more tears' formulas were derived at the expense of lots of animals.

i also like that the Bronner's liquid products are packaged in recycled plastics, and some retailers will fill up smaller bottles of Bronner's if you bring them in, thus saving the energy required to recycle the plastic again.

and, yes, if you buy Bronner's at Target it's going to cost an arm and a leg. But you can get it here at MDC through a Frontier coop in the TP (they do them monthly) - a gallon costs $29, IIRC, plus you'll have to pay for shipping if it's not local. a gallon lasts *forever* - well, technically 16x longer than the 8 oz bottle, i guess and when you buy the gallon you can put just a little bit of soap in a smaller bottle - because i have kids who occasionally dump it out in the bathtub too you can also dilute it a bit, which stretches it even longer
post #29 of 39
There is a legend that soap was invented when a pot of cooking tallow fell into the ashes of the fire. There's another more disturbing one about Pompeii. It's not usually found in nature, but it's possible to be made without human intervention.

Do you work for J&J by any chance? I know there's a big plant in New Brunswick.
post #30 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by paquerette View Post
There is a legend that soap was invented when a pot of cooking tallow fell into the ashes of the fire. There's another more disturbing one about Pompeii. It's not usually found in nature, but it's possible to be made without human intervention.

Do you work for J&J by any chance? I know there's a big plant in New Brunswick.
Please explain to me how getting cooking tallow in ashes is "happens in nature" or that anything in pompeii happened without human intervention.

No I don't work at J&J. I SAH. My husband works for Firmenich if you really must know. I have not even said anything remotely favorable about J&J products anyway. No more personal attacks on my integrity please.

Its only because I know how chemical industry works, and how these products are created that I know with certainty that California Baby isn't any more natural than Equate baby wash or whatever else you can get for 50 cents at wal-mart. It's frustrating for me to try to tell you guys this, because we REALLY want to do what's best for the environment and we start with what we know---usually what we can find hyped up on TV or the internet... and we miss the big picture. Being green needs to start with the chemistry, and no detergents are created by green processes. I'll tell you why- its difficult. And expensive. My husband works all day to try to find solvent free pathways to fragrances, It's a long and arduous process.

*heavy sigh*

Saponification is one of the most green reactions around, btw. Hooray for soap! Boo for detergent.

Even when you get essential oils, the processes they use to extract those oils create a lot of chemical waste that goes... where? Into the water. Just think about it the next time you get a "natural" product that contains rose oil or sandalwood or whatever.
post #31 of 39
OT
I remember my mother's disgust that I wasn't using J&J products. "How are they going to smell like a baby?"
post #32 of 39
So, I am getting the idea that soapnuts are the ideal choice...

They are natural since they come from a tree with nothing but gathering required.

Saponification comes from agitation and/or heat and/or water, not chemicals.

Growing your own soapberry tree would be the ultimate in green since there would be no shipping required and no actual cost. There is still the potential cost of watering the tree, if you live in an area where natural rainfall would be insufficient.
post #33 of 39
:
post #34 of 39
can someone fill me in on this soap nuts thing? also... howcome they say 'natural of they are not? is it just because its a selling point or did i miss something in the definition of natural? lso.. is it bad that i just wash ds i water? lol.. he doesnt get that dirty
post #35 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by holothuroidea View Post
Please explain to me how getting cooking tallow in ashes is "happens in nature" or that anything in pompeii happened without human intervention.

No I don't work at J&J. I SAH. My husband works for Firmenich if you really must know. I have not even said anything remotely favorable about J&J products anyway. No more personal attacks on my integrity please.

Its only because I know how chemical industry works, and how these products are created that I know with certainty that California Baby isn't any more natural than Equate baby wash or whatever else you can get for 50 cents at wal-mart. It's frustrating for me to try to tell you guys this, because we REALLY want to do what's best for the environment and we start with what we know---usually what we can find hyped up on TV or the internet... and we miss the big picture. Being green needs to start with the chemistry, and no detergents are created by green processes. I'll tell you why- its difficult. And expensive. My husband works all day to try to find solvent free pathways to fragrances, It's a long and arduous process.

*heavy sigh*

Saponification is one of the most green reactions around, btw. Hooray for soap! Boo for detergent.

Even when you get essential oils, the processes they use to extract those oils create a lot of chemical waste that goes... where? Into the water. Just think about it the next time you get a "natural" product that contains rose oil or sandalwood or whatever.

I totally appreciate your clarifications and explainations.

D.
post #36 of 39
I want to say I LOVE it when chemists post about this stuff. I find it really interesting. Thanks for sticking your neck out and sharing your knowledge, holothuroidea!
post #37 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by holothuroidea View Post
I personally think that the best products are usually the cheapest. That is, they contain less additives.

If you want something safe and cheap, go with regular old soap. Soap is very stable and usually does not contain a lot of additives other than fragrance. Ivory bar soap is mostly just soap and some very mild fragrance. Very inexpensive and easy to find. The disadvantage of soap over detergent is that soap easily dissolves natural oils and rinses very clean and therefore can have a drying effect on the skin.

Detergents are almost always more expensive and will always contain many more additives than soap. Detergents (surfactants) are better at selectively removing dirt and junk while leaving natural oils mostly undissolved, they also are famous for not rinsing away completely--leaving a residue on your skin. (This is usually considered beneficial. For example, a lot of detergent soaps will contain lotions or "skin protectants" that will stay on your skin to keep it moisturized.) All of the additives are similar between brands and are necessary to stabilize the detergent so it does not degrade, and so that it stays in solution.

I do not necessarily think that the additives they use in detergents are harmful when used in appropriate amounts. However, it can't hurt to avoid them either! If you want something inexpensive and safe, go for soap (something considered "pure" soap, like home made (more expensive), I think Ivory is probably the best commercial brand). If you find that soap dries out their skin, go for an inexpensive detergent (liquid) soap-- preferably something fragrance free and with as little additives as possible.

The important thing to remember is that just because a product is marketed as "natural" does not make it better. California Baby wash is still a detergent and still contains those necessary stabilizers and additives. Actually, it's a far inferior detergent. Save your money.

Okay well that was my soap lecture, I hope it helps.
Bolding is mine.
Just wanted to throw in my 2cents
Any commercial bar soap has had the glycerin removed. Glycerin is a naturally occuring ingredient in soap. It is a humectant which means that it draws moisture from the air around it to itself. This is why commercial soaps can be so drying. It's worth it to get "natural" or handmade/homemade soap that has not had the glycerin removed.

Actually, making your own soap is not really that hard once you get the hang of it. It can be inexpensive. And you can make large batches to last a long time!! I make an unscented plain bar that we always use on the babies. Just don't get it in their eyes.
post #38 of 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by snanna View Post
I want to say I LOVE it when chemists post about this stuff. I find it really interesting. Thanks for sticking your neck out and sharing your knowledge, holothuroidea!
:

One of the reasons I love MDC is that people here think and question the mainstream world. When some things in the mainstream world aren't necessarily as you predicted or hoped they would be, that shouldn't be a reason to get upset. We're all learning!
post #39 of 39
I have a little guy who is very sensitive to produces, and the more our family learned about hearbs and chemicals, the more most of our home and body cleaning needs have been done with herbs. Baths for the kids I steep comphery and lavender a big handful of each boil on the stove and add to bath water, gently cleans and helps any diaper rash or skin problem, leaves them smelling fresh and clean, works on hair also. There are great books out there on herbs and how to use them in the home and for body care. Its fun for the whole family to make things and you know the quality of the stuff in it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Natural Body Care
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Natural Family Living › The Mindful Home › Natural Body Care › Johnson and Johnson Baby Soap