Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › July 2008 › Vaginal exam?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Vaginal exam? - Page 2  

post #21 of 30
No pros that I know of.

Cons are infection, setting up expectations for labor to start that are inaccurate, possible induction if they want to "move things along", possible breaking of waters without permission, its possible painful and almost always really uncomfortable....
post #22 of 30
The only thing it will tell you is what you are at the time of the cervical check. You can actually goes backwards as a result of a check, rather than forwards, and it will tell you nothing about when and if labor might get started. I personally have declined all through this pregnancy and will do so until I am in labor and someone gives me a darn good reason to go poking around up in there...
post #23 of 30
I had one a couple weeks ago just to make sure there wasn't anything crazy going on (we were going on a day long out-of-state trip that weekeend).

I had one near term with my last pregnancy, and it was nice to get confirmation that the changes I was feeling in my cervix when my son mashed his head into it (i.e. it stopped hurting and feeling like a pap smear and started to feel like a deep, pleasant, stretching) were actually real.

I don't think I'll do any more this pregnancy, because while I am curious I'm also getting impatient and I don't think more information will help with that


Interestingly, I don't mind them during pregnancy but I don't like them during labor. I'd rather just go with the flow then.
post #24 of 30
According to one of my midwives, the only time you need an internal exam is when you feel the urge to push- you want to make sure that your cervix is out of the way so you don't hurt it.

I agree with all the former responses... including risk of infection, especially if you're being checked at a doctor's office or at the hospital while in labor... they're dirty places. At least at home your body is used to those germs so I don't think having sex encompasses the same risks unless you're having sex outside your home.
post #25 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liea View Post
According to one of my midwives, the only time you need an internal exam is when you feel the urge to push- you want to make sure that your cervix is out of the way so you don't hurt it.
And that's a dubious reason. There are those who absolutely insist that the true urge to push is only accompanied by full dilation, so a check for completion is a moot point. Likewise, "full dilation" doesn't necessarily mean you should push if you dont' have the urge. I personally don't feel I have enough experience to say whether I think this is true, but in my previous births, it bears out.
post #26 of 30
For me, personally, it's a sacred space. Mine, DH's, and the baby's for the trip.
post #27 of 30
I had one this morning. I found out I am 2 cms dilated and not thinned at all. It didn't hurt at all, just pressure. I did it because I never did with the other 2 and I was wondering if I dilated much before labor.
post #28 of 30
One more Con:
As someone mentioned - they can be used to force induction on you.
Happened to a friend of mine, she was about 3 or 4 cm for 3 weeks straight. So her OB wanted to induce and said, "That is unheard of!" She was close to her due date at the time of induction as well - so she must have been having the internal exams regularly from 37W on.

I figure if she had not had those internal exams, that conversation would have never come up!

As others have said, why get your hopes up if you're dilated & effaced - when nothing could happen for weeks?
Likewise, why get discouraged if you're NOT dilated & effaced - when you could deliver in a matter of days?

It's just not a meaningful thing.

As for infection - I'm GBS+, so I KNOW there's a risk from exams of pushing harmful bacteria from the vaginal opening up to the uterus. And even if you test negative for GBS, it could appear later - so even with a sterile latex glove, there's still an issue of the exams leading to increased risk of infection.
post #29 of 30
I'll check myself if I really want to know. It's my body.

I'm in the group that sees NO benefit in a care provider checking, just a lot of reasons not to.
post #30 of 30
I just had my 35 week appointment with my midwife and I asked her when she usually starts doing vaginal exams because I was expecting to have one next week or so. She said, "When you're in labor."

So we had a long discussion about it. She sees no benefit in knowing dilation or effacement before labor begins, because it does not really mean anything. You can walk around at 3cm for weeks or you can be closed up tight and go into labor the next day.

She would use one to check for vertex position if she could not easily palpitate the position, but would not go near the cervix unless I request it. She followed this with, "But you can check yourself if you want to." And she described to me what to look for, which was great!

As far as checks during labor go she likes to do one as soon as she comes (for the home birth), to know what the starting point is. She recommends the before pushing check for first time moms, but if you labor the baby down gently without forced pushing (some women feel the need to do this and some don't) there is no need to check.

So, that's my MW's opinion.

As for me, I like knowing things. I check my blood sugar for the fun of it, if I had a sphygmomanometer I'd check my BP for fun too. I'm too much of a scientist... I'd be getting checked every 20 minutes and making graphs during labor if it were practical.

I'll probably request more exams than she usually does because the curiosity will be killing me.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: July 2008
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › July 2008 › Vaginal exam?