I babysit for 6 different families each week, all at different times, in the families' homes.
For the past year, my written illness policy has been that I will care for sick children as long as they're not very contagious and as long as I'm in good health myself. Each time I babysit for sick kids, I notify the other families so they can decide whether it's okay for me to then babysit for their kids or not.
It has worked out alright until now, but I need a more detailed and clear policy, because I have a mom who's quite upset with me right now.
Her child is currently sick with what's likely to be a highly contagious childhood illness - the child has 2 out of the 3 main symptoms, and when I talked to the mom yesterday, she thought it was likely that her child has the illness.
I told the other families about it, describing the child's symptoms, and 3 of the families told me they wouldn't want me babysitting for their children this week if I also babysat for the sick child this week, because they are worried about contagion.
So I told the sick kid's mom I can't babysit for her this week, and now she is mad. She says that because her child hasn't been officially diagnosed with anything, it's wrong for me to independently make the decision that her child is highly contagious. She wants to know how I decide to pass on "vague medical information" to other families, and how I decide whether or not to babysit for sick kids.
She wants to know if there's a way for my policy to be more clear and objective. Any ideas??
It's hard, because I don't want to have to say to all of the families, "I will not babysit for your children if they are sick, ever, end of story." I know one of the reasons families choose to hire babysitters instead of putting their kids in daycare is so that they WILL have childcare coverage when the kids are sick! Daycares have strict policies about kids not attending while sick, of course, and then parents have to miss work. Babysitters generally have more flexibility than this. I do babysit sick kids when they have colds, fevers, diarrhea...and then I let the other families know...occasionally another family will ask me not to come to their house, after I've been with a sick kid, but mostly it hasn't been an issue 'cause the illnesses haven't been too serious or contagious. Although there have been a few times where I've told the parents, sorry, your kid is too sick for me to babysit this time. And sometimes the parents don't even ask me to come in when their kid is sick - they cancel my hours to stay home with the sick kid themselves.
This is the first time I've had a parent get mad at me for not coming in to babysit her sick child, and she wants a more objective policy. And perhaps my policy IS too subjective, and taken on a case-by-case basis. This particular time, I am choosing not to babysit for the sick child because if I did so, I'd be losing 20+ hours of work this week with the other families, who said not to come in if I'm also with the sick child. And I can't afford to lose those 20+ hrs of work.
Suggestions for a better policy?? As it stands now, I say that I won't babysit for "very contagious" children. But, this mom has a point, "very contagious" by whose judgment? The doctor said the child might have X, which is highly contagious, or she might have Y, which is only slightly contagious. If even the doctor can't be sure, then I still have to make a judgment call, don't I? But the mom is mad at me for doing so, wishing that I would go with HER judgment call/opinion, of her child not being very contagious.
Is it wrong for me to factor in the opinions of the other families, when one family's child is sick? That is, if the majority of the other families say "You can't babysit our kids, if you're simultaneously babysitting for the sick kid," is it REASONABLE for me to decide whether or not to babysit for the sick kid based on the collective opinion of the other families?
I want to repair my relationship with the mom who's currently mad at me, and I need to come up with a clear illness policy that's clear and fair to ALL of the families. Currently, I believe she feels that I'm being unfair to her and her family, by canceling my scheduled hours this week. I'd like to point out to her that my illness policy isn't just to penalize her - it's also to protect HER children, when OTHER families' kids are sick. The thing is, this mom is really non-stressed about other kids' illnesses. She has told me that unless some kid has a life-threatening illness, she's not worried about her kids' exposure. So from her perspective, I'm guessing, it seems like my policy unfairly punishes her and doesn't benefit her. But most families are NOT that unconcerned about the spread of illness...
For the past year, my written illness policy has been that I will care for sick children as long as they're not very contagious and as long as I'm in good health myself. Each time I babysit for sick kids, I notify the other families so they can decide whether it's okay for me to then babysit for their kids or not.
It has worked out alright until now, but I need a more detailed and clear policy, because I have a mom who's quite upset with me right now.
Her child is currently sick with what's likely to be a highly contagious childhood illness - the child has 2 out of the 3 main symptoms, and when I talked to the mom yesterday, she thought it was likely that her child has the illness.
I told the other families about it, describing the child's symptoms, and 3 of the families told me they wouldn't want me babysitting for their children this week if I also babysat for the sick child this week, because they are worried about contagion.
So I told the sick kid's mom I can't babysit for her this week, and now she is mad. She says that because her child hasn't been officially diagnosed with anything, it's wrong for me to independently make the decision that her child is highly contagious. She wants to know how I decide to pass on "vague medical information" to other families, and how I decide whether or not to babysit for sick kids.
She wants to know if there's a way for my policy to be more clear and objective. Any ideas??
It's hard, because I don't want to have to say to all of the families, "I will not babysit for your children if they are sick, ever, end of story." I know one of the reasons families choose to hire babysitters instead of putting their kids in daycare is so that they WILL have childcare coverage when the kids are sick! Daycares have strict policies about kids not attending while sick, of course, and then parents have to miss work. Babysitters generally have more flexibility than this. I do babysit sick kids when they have colds, fevers, diarrhea...and then I let the other families know...occasionally another family will ask me not to come to their house, after I've been with a sick kid, but mostly it hasn't been an issue 'cause the illnesses haven't been too serious or contagious. Although there have been a few times where I've told the parents, sorry, your kid is too sick for me to babysit this time. And sometimes the parents don't even ask me to come in when their kid is sick - they cancel my hours to stay home with the sick kid themselves.
This is the first time I've had a parent get mad at me for not coming in to babysit her sick child, and she wants a more objective policy. And perhaps my policy IS too subjective, and taken on a case-by-case basis. This particular time, I am choosing not to babysit for the sick child because if I did so, I'd be losing 20+ hours of work this week with the other families, who said not to come in if I'm also with the sick child. And I can't afford to lose those 20+ hrs of work.
Suggestions for a better policy?? As it stands now, I say that I won't babysit for "very contagious" children. But, this mom has a point, "very contagious" by whose judgment? The doctor said the child might have X, which is highly contagious, or she might have Y, which is only slightly contagious. If even the doctor can't be sure, then I still have to make a judgment call, don't I? But the mom is mad at me for doing so, wishing that I would go with HER judgment call/opinion, of her child not being very contagious.
Is it wrong for me to factor in the opinions of the other families, when one family's child is sick? That is, if the majority of the other families say "You can't babysit our kids, if you're simultaneously babysitting for the sick kid," is it REASONABLE for me to decide whether or not to babysit for the sick kid based on the collective opinion of the other families?
I want to repair my relationship with the mom who's currently mad at me, and I need to come up with a clear illness policy that's clear and fair to ALL of the families. Currently, I believe she feels that I'm being unfair to her and her family, by canceling my scheduled hours this week. I'd like to point out to her that my illness policy isn't just to penalize her - it's also to protect HER children, when OTHER families' kids are sick. The thing is, this mom is really non-stressed about other kids' illnesses. She has told me that unless some kid has a life-threatening illness, she's not worried about her kids' exposure. So from her perspective, I'm guessing, it seems like my policy unfairly punishes her and doesn't benefit her. But most families are NOT that unconcerned about the spread of illness...










