I understand why other people would have more on their husbands, and not on themselves.
I truly was only speaking for myself when I said I couldn't figure out why my husband would have more coverage than myself.
Considering we wouldn't take the childcare route, we would still make it so we could have the living parent at home full time to continue our current lifestyle as much as possible.
If my kids lost a parent, there is no way in the world I'd want to stick them in school/day care so I, or my husband, could get a job. I think it would be too hard on them. We decided to get that amount to pay off our house and van, and perhaps get a part time job to supplement living off the balance of the insurance. At least until the youngest would be older.
I truly was only speaking for myself when I said I couldn't figure out why my husband would have more coverage than myself.
Considering we wouldn't take the childcare route, we would still make it so we could have the living parent at home full time to continue our current lifestyle as much as possible.If my kids lost a parent, there is no way in the world I'd want to stick them in school/day care so I, or my husband, could get a job. I think it would be too hard on them. We decided to get that amount to pay off our house and van, and perhaps get a part time job to supplement living off the balance of the insurance. At least until the youngest would be older.






:
