Confessing to doing something, but pleading not guilty to certain charges is not necessarily contradictory.
There is much to question in all this. The child received the vaccines the same day. That is certainly a situation a good lawyer would follow up on. Vaccines can cause horrific damage, including death. It's diffucult to determine from the information provided exactly what damage to the child occurred that day. The brain condition and bleeding are evident, but what of the broken ribs? They mention some were prior to March 12. How many or perhaps all. What can be connected to that day? The bleeding inside the head is obviously the cause of death and all possible causes for the bleeding should be looked at.
Here's a possiblity. The baby is vaccinated that day. A vaccine reaction occurs in the form of a screaming baby suffering from the toxins introduced into his frail body. The father at wits end due to a strained relationship grabs the baby forcefully. The same father quite possibly did so in the past as well to the point of braking a tender rib or perhaps this child had been building toward this moment from the onslaught of toxins. If the child possibly died as a result of the vaccines, then the spectrum of vaccine damage was perhaps being traversed as the toxins accumulated. When the body's resources are being taxed over and over who knows what the tipping point is or what all the bodily reactions could be. What relationship do we see between infantile scurvy and vaccines depleting the body of vitamin C? What is the relationship between infantile scurvy and rib fractures? Unfortuantely the vaccine movement certainly doesn't want to find out. If any of the child's health condition prior to death was related to vaccination, then this isn't so absurd. The father, in total shock from the death of his baby, is confronted by police who are not happy. They take the death of a baby very seriously. The man admits the truth that he has grabbed the baby forcefully in the past (think about it. How many guilty of murder admit to the charge? If anything, by talking and saying what he did, he proves he thought he was not guilty and had nothing to hide). That day as well, especially if the child was reacting to vaccines the way so many do. And if this child was already at a tipping point, then the reaction may have been REAL bad. The man feels guilty because he hasn't been the best dad. All those previous trips to the hospital didn't show any signs of abuse, including bruising. The mom wasn't saying anything to anyone. She obviously was not so concerned that she would not leave her baby alone with the father.
There are a lot of questions with this one. Did the child have bruises all over his body from the supposed violent shaking? What other physical indicators were there?
Everyone deserves a fair trail, even the vaccine industry for all the pain and suffering they have caused, and certainly this father.
:
