Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Circumcision in Africa not necessary
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Circumcision in Africa not necessary  

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
These calls for circumcision are terribly misleading
Daily Nation, Kenya - Aug 24, 2008
http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/Opinion...48/-/3l80xx/-/

Role of male circumcision exaggerated in HIV fight
New Vision, Uganda - Aug 10, 2008
http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/459/643823

Quote:
The argument is that uncircumcised males got infected faster than their circumcised friends because the circumcised males required a period of abstinence after circumcision.
Quote:
Some African communities practice “dry sex,” with some women inserting drying agents in their private parts, thus causing abrasion and fissures. When combined with “dry sex,” circumcision may increase the risk of HIV-infection and a number of sexually transmitted infections through abrasions because dry sex increases friction by inhibiting ‘gliding action.’
post #2 of 4
Having had soreness from an episiotomy/tearing/scarring make sex painful for months, I can't even imagine how horribly painful "dry" sex is. And I also can't imagine why a man would even like it. :Puke

Nice to see some common sense!
post #3 of 4
Common sense is not so common. This is "uncommonly" good.
post #4 of 4
Why not register at each newspaper and post letters of support? These columnists need to be supported by Westerners.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Case Against Circumcision
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › The Case Against Circumcision › Circumcision in Africa not necessary