Sudden infant death syndrome and gut flora. (also about vaccines)
This information has been taken out of hillary Butlers book "just a little prick", I just emailed her and got her consent to post this, and she requested I posted the below link as well.
Why do vaccine reactions happen?
Dr Reisinger's work has a very important link.
Because his life has been centered around studying human and animal gut flora
(bottle feeding affects the normal gut flora in a baby and changes it permanently).
His veterinary focus has been calf scours, resulting from calves being deprived of their mothers colostrum. He had amassed huge amount of information on the topic of colostrum and breast milk in a very broad way, by also studying cows, horse, monkeys, humans and humans, and humans.
His study of the human aspect was sparked when a relatives baby had a serve vaccine reaction and nearly died. The baby was bottle-fed but the connection made no sense at the time. As he saw more cases he started asking questions and looked at the composition of human breast milk in comparison with formula, and how that affected the gut.
That was when he saw the similarity between E-coli and SIDS in babies, and fatal scours in calves being fed powdered milk and no colostrum. The two looked very similar in pathology and outward symptomatology. Back in the medical library he found the early literature which so clearly showed the E-coli/SIDS connection in humans.
He studied some of the baby cases who had died after receiving the DPT shot's. He discovered most of the babies in the study who died were bottle fed. Even most experts know that bottle feeding is a risk factor for SIDS.
Over a three year period of the 86 cases of infants dying of SIDS 83 were artificially fed, and only three breast fed at the time of death. But any breastfed baby receiving one bottle of formula has such significant gut flora and pH change that they should be classified as bottle fed for two weeks.
As far as he is concerned any baby receiving one bottle of formula is NOT breast fed.
___________________________
Tissier in France did the first studies on gut flora in the 1900's. Book's came out on the subject steadily after that, but Erik Olsen's 1949 book on the subject should be mandatory reading even now.
Many recent studies (seemingly done by people who haven't read the old studies) include babies who have had formula in the breastfed section, which nullifies the relevance of the findings. Nor is the current rampant indiscriminate and repeated use of antibiotics in babies, which radically alters gut flora, thus encouraging dangerous bacteria, factored in to their thinking.
The clostridium difficile outbreak in England brought this in to sharp focus with recommendations given to adults as to the foods they should eat for eight weeks after antibiotics to return the gut flora to normal. How is that never considered necessary for bottle fed babies?
The difference between a formula fed and breast fed baby leads to a bottle fed baby being more susceptible to drug reactions, including vaccines.
One of the studies done in 1963 has a table showing that the intestinal pH of a breast fed baby is 4.5-5.8 (acid) And while that of a formula fed baby is 7.8-8.0 (alkaline). pH is crucial as to which bacteria will grow where. Good probiotic bacteria like the pH of a breastfed baby, but the more dangerous gram-negative and bad bacteria like the higher gut pH of a bottle-fed baby.
Gut flora in breast-fed babies have a lot of lactobacillus and bifidus, bacteria and other probiotics, which is another name for the good bacteria. Like the stuff you find in Easiyo Biolife yogurt , only more so.
Compared with breastfed babies, bottle fed babies have 1000 times the numbers of a bacteria called E-coli which likes the alkaline environment.( bottle fed babies have alkaline guts, breastfed babies don't).
Every time one E-coli bacterium divides into two, it drops of a bit of its envelope (lipo-polysaccharide), which is an endotoxin in itself, though some of the medical people have the illusion that only certain types of E-coli cause this problem. The other name for this E-coli envelope particle is curlin. Curlin has to be chopped up (degraded) by the liver, because curlin is very dangerous.
Bottle fed babies also have high levels of curlin and other gram negative bacteria, some of which can also produce similar toxins. Because of the difference in acidity and nutrients received, the gut flora of a bottle fed baby is very different to that of a breastfed baby, and has different influences on the baby immunologically, physiologically and biochemically.
E-coli bacteria love the higher than breast milk protein concentration of baby formula. There are also other crucial nutritional imbalances and bio availability issues with formula. Which put a bottle fed babies metabolism and biochemistry under far greater stress than that of a breastfed baby.
Sleeping metabolic rates and body temperatures are higher in formula fed babies. Total daily energy expenditure is significantly greater, which is understandable, since the ingredients of formula puts the body under a lot of physiological stress, a problem known to doctors for decades.
Again, E-coli both thrives in heat and because it is potentially pyogenic, creates heat. Heat itself actually changes the pH of gut flora, and both conditions encourage even more E-coli growth.
--------------------------------------------
http://www.beyondconformity.co.nz/about-the-trust
This information has been taken out of hillary Butlers book "just a little prick", I just emailed her and got her consent to post this, and she requested I posted the below link as well.
Why do vaccine reactions happen?
Dr Reisinger's work has a very important link.
Because his life has been centered around studying human and animal gut flora
(bottle feeding affects the normal gut flora in a baby and changes it permanently).
His veterinary focus has been calf scours, resulting from calves being deprived of their mothers colostrum. He had amassed huge amount of information on the topic of colostrum and breast milk in a very broad way, by also studying cows, horse, monkeys, humans and humans, and humans.
His study of the human aspect was sparked when a relatives baby had a serve vaccine reaction and nearly died. The baby was bottle-fed but the connection made no sense at the time. As he saw more cases he started asking questions and looked at the composition of human breast milk in comparison with formula, and how that affected the gut.
That was when he saw the similarity between E-coli and SIDS in babies, and fatal scours in calves being fed powdered milk and no colostrum. The two looked very similar in pathology and outward symptomatology. Back in the medical library he found the early literature which so clearly showed the E-coli/SIDS connection in humans.
He studied some of the baby cases who had died after receiving the DPT shot's. He discovered most of the babies in the study who died were bottle fed. Even most experts know that bottle feeding is a risk factor for SIDS.
Over a three year period of the 86 cases of infants dying of SIDS 83 were artificially fed, and only three breast fed at the time of death. But any breastfed baby receiving one bottle of formula has such significant gut flora and pH change that they should be classified as bottle fed for two weeks.
As far as he is concerned any baby receiving one bottle of formula is NOT breast fed.
___________________________
Tissier in France did the first studies on gut flora in the 1900's. Book's came out on the subject steadily after that, but Erik Olsen's 1949 book on the subject should be mandatory reading even now.
Many recent studies (seemingly done by people who haven't read the old studies) include babies who have had formula in the breastfed section, which nullifies the relevance of the findings. Nor is the current rampant indiscriminate and repeated use of antibiotics in babies, which radically alters gut flora, thus encouraging dangerous bacteria, factored in to their thinking.
The clostridium difficile outbreak in England brought this in to sharp focus with recommendations given to adults as to the foods they should eat for eight weeks after antibiotics to return the gut flora to normal. How is that never considered necessary for bottle fed babies?
The difference between a formula fed and breast fed baby leads to a bottle fed baby being more susceptible to drug reactions, including vaccines.
One of the studies done in 1963 has a table showing that the intestinal pH of a breast fed baby is 4.5-5.8 (acid) And while that of a formula fed baby is 7.8-8.0 (alkaline). pH is crucial as to which bacteria will grow where. Good probiotic bacteria like the pH of a breastfed baby, but the more dangerous gram-negative and bad bacteria like the higher gut pH of a bottle-fed baby.
Gut flora in breast-fed babies have a lot of lactobacillus and bifidus, bacteria and other probiotics, which is another name for the good bacteria. Like the stuff you find in Easiyo Biolife yogurt , only more so.
Compared with breastfed babies, bottle fed babies have 1000 times the numbers of a bacteria called E-coli which likes the alkaline environment.( bottle fed babies have alkaline guts, breastfed babies don't).
Every time one E-coli bacterium divides into two, it drops of a bit of its envelope (lipo-polysaccharide), which is an endotoxin in itself, though some of the medical people have the illusion that only certain types of E-coli cause this problem. The other name for this E-coli envelope particle is curlin. Curlin has to be chopped up (degraded) by the liver, because curlin is very dangerous.
Bottle fed babies also have high levels of curlin and other gram negative bacteria, some of which can also produce similar toxins. Because of the difference in acidity and nutrients received, the gut flora of a bottle fed baby is very different to that of a breastfed baby, and has different influences on the baby immunologically, physiologically and biochemically.
E-coli bacteria love the higher than breast milk protein concentration of baby formula. There are also other crucial nutritional imbalances and bio availability issues with formula. Which put a bottle fed babies metabolism and biochemistry under far greater stress than that of a breastfed baby.
Sleeping metabolic rates and body temperatures are higher in formula fed babies. Total daily energy expenditure is significantly greater, which is understandable, since the ingredients of formula puts the body under a lot of physiological stress, a problem known to doctors for decades.
Again, E-coli both thrives in heat and because it is potentially pyogenic, creates heat. Heat itself actually changes the pH of gut flora, and both conditions encourage even more E-coli growth.
--------------------------------------------
http://www.beyondconformity.co.nz/about-the-trust
