Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2008 › Losing dilation?!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Losing dilation?!  

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
2 weeks ago I was checked by my midwife and was 1 cm. 40% effaced.

Last week I was checked by the OB and was told I'm 2 cm. 50-60% thinned.

Yesterday I was checked by the same OB and was told I was at 1cm. and THICK.

WTF?! :

It was an awful visit, I had voiced some concerns and unfortunately got a rather rude lecture instead of comfort, so is it possible that I was just tense when he checked me, and that's how I somehow lost dilation?
post #2 of 12
Yes, it's possible. ANimals in the wild are known to "suck" their babies back in and flee if they sense a predator. And Ina May has many documented cases of "backward" dilation when a woman feels threatened.
post #3 of 12
If you aren't overdue (which you might be now, but surely not 2 weeks ago) why are they checking anyway?

The whole concept of checking dilation is flawed - one ob's 50% effaced is another midwife's 80% - they'd need to have felt your cervix BEFORE effacement to know how long it usually is.

Also my DD's head was 35cm in circumference at birth, so it clearly wouldn't have fitted out if i'd only been 10cm dilated. It's all so much guess work. Add the stress on top (it's unethical to do a study where we upset pregnant women and then check their cervices right?) makes it even more so.

I'm sorry your ob wasn't reassuring. I hope you get a lovely birth
post #4 of 12
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBecGo View Post
If you aren't overdue (which you might be now, but surely not 2 weeks ago) why are they checking anyway?
They just do, starting at 36 weeks. It doesn't bother me though, especially since my last baby came at 37 weeks!
post #5 of 12
But why? I was 2-3 at 38weeks. I was still 2-3 at 41weeks. It doesn't tell you anything, why do they do it?
post #6 of 12
Thread Starter 
post #7 of 12
How bizarre! Can you decline if you want to?
post #8 of 12
Bless your heart...can you consider not getting any more checks till your in labor. I choose not be checked because if i am dialated it really wouldnt tell me much. Baby will come when he/she is ready. Plus i dont want anyone messing down there unless emergency.
I would consider no more cervix checks for now.
Big Hugs mama
post #9 of 12
internal exams drive me crazy. i dont do them and my MW is fine w/ that. just makes women worry.
post #10 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBecGo View Post
Also my DD's head was 35cm in circumference at birth, so it clearly wouldn't have fitted out if i'd only been 10cm dilated.
Just to clear up a common source of confusion. 10cm dilated refers to the diameter, (across the middle of the circle), while circumference is around the outside of the circle. Without doing the math formulas to be exact, I can say that 35 cm circumference is very close to 10 cm diameter.
post #11 of 12
I also opt for no cervical checks until the pushing stage, and only because with my first I pushed a little too soon which can make things a bit harder.

The only number we're ever really happy with is 10!!
post #12 of 12
LOL, DO the maths, C=pi d - 10cm dilation = 31.1418cm head. 11cm dilation = 34.559cm head. 12cm dilation = 37.701cm head. And 35cm is a smallish head - my friend delivered a 9lb boy with a 39cm head - are we going to say there's no real difference between 10cm and 12.5? When the difference between 2.5cm and 5cm is how one is diagnosed as in labour or not, and a woman who dilates to 7.5 then stops isn't "full" she's "failure to progress". Based on the maths the MAJORITY of women are aiming for at least 11cm, probably more.

Full dilation is when the cervix has been fully drawn up and there is no longer any distinction to feel between the vagina and the uterus, it's one smooth tunnel. Obviously not all women would be exactly the same number of cm across, even if babies heads and pelvic outlets were completely round, which they aren't.

The just call full dilation 10cm, even if it's more like 8cm or 13cm. Dilation at NO stage indicates anything. Some women are at 4cm dilated for the last 5 weeks of pregnancy, others go from 2-"10" in under 30mins. It's a poor clinical signpost to rely on, it tells you nothing about how close labour or birth is and it is a source of worry for the mother, worry which will ironically close the cervix and leave her feeling defeated if after hours of labour she is "only" a certain number of cm.

Dilation is worth checking if a woman is pushing with no results for more than 40 minutes or so (possible anterior lip), or if the baby seems very high still when mum wants to push (possible posterior position) but for a normal woman in a normal pregnancy or labour it is unnecessary and unhelpful. I went into transition at 3cm, my transition was TEXTBOOK, my cervix was not. I delivered an hour later.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: September 2008
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2008 › Losing dilation?!