My DD's pediatrician says there is a blood test to determine which foods DD is reacting to, but suggests we may not want do it right now because she is only 4 mos old and taking the blood would be very traumatic. I completely understand that and don't want to have DD go through that, but we are having so much trouble getting to baseline that I am just so tempted to have the test done. I wonder if the reactions to the food intolerances are worse than the blood test. What would you do? At what age do you think it is best to have the blood test done?
post #1 of 11
9/15/08 at 10:17pm