Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Vaccines a month before birth protect babies for first 6 months, study says
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Vaccines a month before birth protect babies for first 6 months, study says  

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
post #2 of 9
NO WAY IN H*LL would I be injected with anything while I was pregnant!
I never even took any pain relievers and hated it when I needed my asthma inhalers.
Besides I don't believe in the flu shot anyway.
post #3 of 9
Quote:
In the test of 340 pregnant women in Bangladesh, the shots cut the risk of flu by 63 percent and the risk of respiratory illness overall by 29 percent. There were six confirmed cases of influenza in the vaccinated group, compared to 16 among the mothers given a different vaccine.
I find myself saying this over and over when reading vaccine research.

What the HELL kind of control group is that?

THIS passes as science, and makes the headlines?

:
post #4 of 9
Well I'm confused here...is the article saying the study suggests that some sort of immunity is PASSED to the fetus that lasts for about the first 6 months after birth? Or is it just that since the mother is immune now, the infant is less likely to be exposed?

I also want to know what the "other" vaccine was that was given to the "control" group.

And it's very interesting that they says "one month or more" before birth, and that it lasts for exactly 6 months post-partum, which interestingly is when the baby is now eligible to get their own shot!!! How coincidental!

Were these babies breastfed? Was this study even done during flu season? Gosh, there are so many holes in this article.
post #5 of 9
Anything to get fetuses exposed to 25 mcg of mercury. Because once they're born, the mercury filled vaccines aren't approved until 3 years of age.
post #6 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by janellesmommy View Post
Anything to get fetuses exposed to 25 mcg of mercury. Because once they're born, the mercury filled vaccines aren't approved until 3 years of age.
Is this ironic, or is there actually someone who wants to expose infants to mercury?
post #7 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaterPrimaePuellae View Post
Is this ironic, or is there actually someone who wants to expose infants to mercury?
Everyone knows thimerosal doesn't contribute to autism, because autism continued to rise after they took the mercury out of vaccines. Except they didn't take all the mercury out. They started recommeding flu vaccines, with 25 mcg of mercury to PREGNANT women.

The liability would run into the many trillons of dollars if the 1.5 million autistic kids were compensated for their treatment costs and lost earnings over a lifetime. People have done evil things for a lot less money.
post #8 of 9
I think what they meant to say was:

Vaccines a month before birth prevent anyone ever knowing what the baseline of "normal" is in those babies so nothing can ever be blamed on vaccines

post #9 of 9
Thread Starter 
That is a very good point paquerette
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Vaccinations
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Health › Vaccinations › Vaccines a month before birth protect babies for first 6 months, study says