Quote:
Originally Posted by Sierra 
There is some research out in recent years indicating that delayed exposures to food do not reduce risk of allergies. I wish I had time to hunt it down right now, but sorry to say I don't.
|
One of the problems is that there is a lot of conflicting research. Having a child with life-threatening allergies (and we have no history at all in the family) my personal feeling is that it is safer to delay as long as possible, and to be very, very cautious with what you introduce and when. This seems like the safest course to me, even if you have no history of allergies in your family. Honestly, having an allergic child is so frightening that I'd do every.single.thing.I.could.to.minimize.that.possib ility.
If that means holding off to 3 or later for typically allergic foods, that's what I'd do. There are plenty of other foods to eat, and once you have an allergic reaction, your life becomes so difficult to manage because you then need to avoid those foods at all costs. And every exposure increases the severity of the reaction.
I was very much less cautious until it happened to my child. It really changes your outlook.
If you do introduce nuts, please do so carefully and make sure you are within easy reach of medical help in case you need it. We were lucky and ds survived, but he could very easily not have done. And I was one of those casual parents who could have posted this question on mdc the day before, not really ever believing that it could happen to me.