That's exactly what I say. Then nobody can touch it.
post #21 of 39
10/26/08 at 11:26pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Not in my experience. not at all. Our family doctor has never even asked.
|
It is what they are taught. The AAP actually recommends firing "non-compliant" parents, though GPs have a greater tendency to be naughty and miss opportunities to vaccinate:| http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/...eg/herceg.html Opportunistic vaccination, including in hospital emergency departments, has frequently been identified as a way of improving immunisation coverage.12 In 1996, many GPs potentially missed opportunities to vaccinate by infrequently or never checking children's immunisation status when they presented for another reason. |

) I'm asked about rubella). They jump on people all the time in our ER with tetanus, even if they come in with something completely unrelated, if they can't prove they've had a booster in the last 10 years.
, all over the province), most clinic doctors I've seen (especially with a little child because it's easy for them to fall behind with there being so many so quick on the schedule and they like to remind you to update), and the naturopath we used to see... plus my family doctor.
|
Really? I went to Grand River several times in university and was never asked.
|
|
And besides, "up to date" is not a legal term. My up to date and your up to date and their up to date could be several different things. However- if I were bringing her in for what I believed to be a vax-preventable disease, I would be honest because it could change the course of treatment. For example, many MDs will not dx a fully vax'ed child with pertussis even if they have all the symptoms. Also, in that situation, they might review the chart and figure out you're lying anyways. |
|
I still don't think there is any point. I've never been asked about my vax status or my children's, even when there was a rubella outbreak here.
|
: ) asked is DD's pediatric endocrinologist. 
Recently "fired" non-compliant parent here!|
I'd think it is a lie because you know that they're asking that meaning "Is he up to date on the vaccines we think he should have?" Saying an unvaccinated or partially vaccinated child is up to date would be lying in that situation.
|

|
I'd think it is a lie because you know that they're asking that meaning "Is he up to date on the vaccines we think he should have?" Saying an unvaccinated or partially vaccinated child is up to date would be lying in that situation.
|
From a moral standpoint I don't care if it's lying as I do what is necessary to protect my child and make sure the get proper care instead of fighting off a spinal tap because "he's not vaxed it might be meningitis!" or a social worker.
|
Just curious but in what way does omitting lying about vax status, put a child who is in the ER for a fall at a disadvantage??
|