Hello --
I'm hoping you wise ones can help me with something I've been thinking about lately -- I'm trying to figure out for myself where the lines are with GD vs. permissiveness in dealing with my 19 month old. In particular, I'm hoping you might provide me with examples of what you consider *permissive* parenting in that age group. Also, maybe respond to some particular examples from the past few days... (if you make it that far in this long post!)
First, just a bit about where I'm coming from. I've read a lot about GD (Alfie Kohn, Naomi Aldort, mdc ad nauseum!) and it basically resonates completely with me. My own upbringing was not authoritarian -- but it was also pretty bereft of emotional communication. So my own mothering instincts I would say tend to the permissive end of the permissive/strict continuum -- I certainly never have the instinct to hit or yell -- but I worry that I might be something of a LAX parent. And I worry that my own impaired connection to my own emotions is going to be a big obstacle to overcome in my own parenting.
So, in general, I try to keep my toddler pretty content -- my house is pretty well babyproofed -- when he was in his climbing-on-the-table stage, I tried to keep things as safe as possible, but didn't keep him from getting up there. I'm between jobs right now, and our days are pretty much spent doing toddler-friendly things -- walks, playground, subway, zoo -- with some laundry and (very) occasional vacuuming thrown in. I keep myself sane by doing things after he goes to sleep (internet, netflix, knitting, reading -- I'm pretty much an introvert). I'm almost never in a hurry to get anywhere, so we don't have a lot of transition battles -- occasionally I'll have to forcibly put him on my back or in a stroller -- I hate doing that, but haven't really found a good alternative. At the playground, I let him do pretty much whatever he wants -- he's a great climber, he's not aggressive with other kids, and not even much of a toy snatcher. Most of the time I feel like I'm doing the right thing with him -- but then I wonder -- is this totally unrealistic parenting?? Should he have more limits as a part of his daily routine? Am I just setting myself up for problems when he's older?
Here are a couple of specific incidents where there *was* some kind of conflict, just off the top of my head. Tonight at dinner -- he refused to go in his high chair. Screamed, kicked his legs -- very clearly did NOT want to sit there. So, ate dinner more or less on my lap. Not ideal for me -- BUT -- the alternative, forcing him into his chair, would have been even worse -- I'm pretty sure he would have continued to scream, not eat, maybe throw his food on the floor. Or, even if he HAD settled down -- I'm not really interested in forcing him to do something he doesn't want to if I don't have a good enough reason for it. And tonight, sitting on my lap to eat dinner was OK with me. (I guess I worry that over time, too many things will be "OK with me" at least in the moment -- but that they'll add up to an untenable situation!) Ultimately, I did coax him (willingly) into his chair for two bites of soup -- that felt like a small victory.
Another example: last night, up until 11pm. I *hate* it when he goes to bed late, because it means I lose my only "me" time in the day -- but I'm really not sure what to do about it (other than to try to have a more regular schedule -- which should happen when I start working full time within the next couple of weeks hopefully). So... I read him a bunch of books, and then went and got MY book ("Playful Parenting" of all things) and read while he played with his books. That included a lot of getting out of bed, dropping books behind the bed (which I'm sure my downstairs neighbor did NOT appreciate), reaching over to close my book, nursing for 2 seconds, rolling around the bed... I don't feel great about how I handled that (especially the book dropping part) -- BUT I'm really not sure what I would do differently the next time. I felt like I could deal with it because I was actually sort of getting to do my thing (reading) and NOT being an involved mom for a couple of hours.
The thing is -- overall I have an extremely sweet, even-tempered, easy-going little guy. It's pretty easy to keep him happy -- and so I do. I *think* about my parenting all the time -- in a good way (I think), I'm quite conscious about the kind of mother I want to be. BUT -- to an outside, objective bystander, I'm not sure that you could make any distinction between my "gentle discipline" and another mom's "permissiveness."
ETA: the two clear arenas I can think of with limit-setting at this age are safety and harm-to-others/destructiveness. I am much more easy-going about safety than a lot of other parents -- but this is at least in part because (I think!) I have a good sense of my son's capabilities, and want him to continue to explore and push his own physical boundaries. I am very firm about holding hands while crossing the street -- and he in turn has never challenged that rule. I would *certainly* step in if he were hurting another child -- that hasn't happened yet.
thoughts?
thanks for making it to the end!
esme
I'm hoping you wise ones can help me with something I've been thinking about lately -- I'm trying to figure out for myself where the lines are with GD vs. permissiveness in dealing with my 19 month old. In particular, I'm hoping you might provide me with examples of what you consider *permissive* parenting in that age group. Also, maybe respond to some particular examples from the past few days... (if you make it that far in this long post!)
First, just a bit about where I'm coming from. I've read a lot about GD (Alfie Kohn, Naomi Aldort, mdc ad nauseum!) and it basically resonates completely with me. My own upbringing was not authoritarian -- but it was also pretty bereft of emotional communication. So my own mothering instincts I would say tend to the permissive end of the permissive/strict continuum -- I certainly never have the instinct to hit or yell -- but I worry that I might be something of a LAX parent. And I worry that my own impaired connection to my own emotions is going to be a big obstacle to overcome in my own parenting.
So, in general, I try to keep my toddler pretty content -- my house is pretty well babyproofed -- when he was in his climbing-on-the-table stage, I tried to keep things as safe as possible, but didn't keep him from getting up there. I'm between jobs right now, and our days are pretty much spent doing toddler-friendly things -- walks, playground, subway, zoo -- with some laundry and (very) occasional vacuuming thrown in. I keep myself sane by doing things after he goes to sleep (internet, netflix, knitting, reading -- I'm pretty much an introvert). I'm almost never in a hurry to get anywhere, so we don't have a lot of transition battles -- occasionally I'll have to forcibly put him on my back or in a stroller -- I hate doing that, but haven't really found a good alternative. At the playground, I let him do pretty much whatever he wants -- he's a great climber, he's not aggressive with other kids, and not even much of a toy snatcher. Most of the time I feel like I'm doing the right thing with him -- but then I wonder -- is this totally unrealistic parenting?? Should he have more limits as a part of his daily routine? Am I just setting myself up for problems when he's older?
Here are a couple of specific incidents where there *was* some kind of conflict, just off the top of my head. Tonight at dinner -- he refused to go in his high chair. Screamed, kicked his legs -- very clearly did NOT want to sit there. So, ate dinner more or less on my lap. Not ideal for me -- BUT -- the alternative, forcing him into his chair, would have been even worse -- I'm pretty sure he would have continued to scream, not eat, maybe throw his food on the floor. Or, even if he HAD settled down -- I'm not really interested in forcing him to do something he doesn't want to if I don't have a good enough reason for it. And tonight, sitting on my lap to eat dinner was OK with me. (I guess I worry that over time, too many things will be "OK with me" at least in the moment -- but that they'll add up to an untenable situation!) Ultimately, I did coax him (willingly) into his chair for two bites of soup -- that felt like a small victory.
Another example: last night, up until 11pm. I *hate* it when he goes to bed late, because it means I lose my only "me" time in the day -- but I'm really not sure what to do about it (other than to try to have a more regular schedule -- which should happen when I start working full time within the next couple of weeks hopefully). So... I read him a bunch of books, and then went and got MY book ("Playful Parenting" of all things) and read while he played with his books. That included a lot of getting out of bed, dropping books behind the bed (which I'm sure my downstairs neighbor did NOT appreciate), reaching over to close my book, nursing for 2 seconds, rolling around the bed... I don't feel great about how I handled that (especially the book dropping part) -- BUT I'm really not sure what I would do differently the next time. I felt like I could deal with it because I was actually sort of getting to do my thing (reading) and NOT being an involved mom for a couple of hours.
The thing is -- overall I have an extremely sweet, even-tempered, easy-going little guy. It's pretty easy to keep him happy -- and so I do. I *think* about my parenting all the time -- in a good way (I think), I'm quite conscious about the kind of mother I want to be. BUT -- to an outside, objective bystander, I'm not sure that you could make any distinction between my "gentle discipline" and another mom's "permissiveness."
ETA: the two clear arenas I can think of with limit-setting at this age are safety and harm-to-others/destructiveness. I am much more easy-going about safety than a lot of other parents -- but this is at least in part because (I think!) I have a good sense of my son's capabilities, and want him to continue to explore and push his own physical boundaries. I am very firm about holding hands while crossing the street -- and he in turn has never challenged that rule. I would *certainly* step in if he were hurting another child -- that hasn't happened yet.
thoughts?
thanks for making it to the end!
esme









Call me sappy, but it's nice that the kiddos want to be with me! And, they're attatched to me via the boob, co-sleeping, etc...I'm their safe zone...it makes sense to me!



:

