flitters
03-02-2004, 08:24 PM
i'm expecting my first baby and the questions are starting to come in about how i decided to get my care from a midwife and why i want a homebirth. most everyone has been very supportive (and i'm thrilled dh is confident in this choice). however, there are two people with whom i want to be extra careful when i explain this choice.
one is my MIL who was a labor and delivery nurse for about 20 years and had an emergency c-section with her second child because the monitor showed fetal distress... dh says she knows several wonderful midwifes but is going to have reluctance (and doesn't understand exactly what midwifery care is from her suggestion, "be sure to get a midwife who can give you an epidural because they can be really good in labor.")
the other person whom i want to understand my choice is a very good friend who a doctor is in her second or third year of residency with an obstetrician dealing with high risk pregnancies. i don't want to be offensive but i do want to be clear.
in response to her question, "how did you decide to go with a midwife?" here is what i wrote:
...
as for going with a midwife, that's a bigger question. also on that topic, i'm also planning a home birth - the two kind often go hand in hand. before i go into it more, i just want to clarify that i think in general, ob's offer excellent care and are absolutely neccessary in pregnancies with complications. it turns out though, that it's hard (really, really hard) to find an ob that really advocates natural birth
even for healthy pregnancies.
anyway, i made this decision after about two years and a lot of research and reading (easily over 2 dozen books - i'd happily send a list or some links if you're interested). in short, the midwife model of care centered
on natural birth without unneccessary medical intervention is safe and a better match for my philosophies. care from a midwife is actually more likely to reduce the risks than add to them. home births with a midwife are statistically as safe as obstetrical deliveries of babies from similarly healthy pregnancies and controlled studies have shown home-birthed babies are healthier (higher apgars, reduced infections, less
frequent need of resuccitation) and their mothers have fewer complications. my midwife will do a lot of screening over the next months and if anything comes back questionably (or if the baby is born
prematurely or postdate) i will be sent to an obstetritian who can handle complications. i think what it really comes down to is that for a woman with a normal pregnancy, the best birth experience will be where the mother feels most comfortable and most confident with her (properly trained) care-giver, whether at home or in a hospital, by a midwife or an
obstetrician. now i just hope that my pregnancy is healthy so my baby and i can experience a natural, gentle birth.
...
i would really appreciate any feedback on how to make this better!
thanks in advance!
:D
one is my MIL who was a labor and delivery nurse for about 20 years and had an emergency c-section with her second child because the monitor showed fetal distress... dh says she knows several wonderful midwifes but is going to have reluctance (and doesn't understand exactly what midwifery care is from her suggestion, "be sure to get a midwife who can give you an epidural because they can be really good in labor.")
the other person whom i want to understand my choice is a very good friend who a doctor is in her second or third year of residency with an obstetrician dealing with high risk pregnancies. i don't want to be offensive but i do want to be clear.
in response to her question, "how did you decide to go with a midwife?" here is what i wrote:
...
as for going with a midwife, that's a bigger question. also on that topic, i'm also planning a home birth - the two kind often go hand in hand. before i go into it more, i just want to clarify that i think in general, ob's offer excellent care and are absolutely neccessary in pregnancies with complications. it turns out though, that it's hard (really, really hard) to find an ob that really advocates natural birth
even for healthy pregnancies.
anyway, i made this decision after about two years and a lot of research and reading (easily over 2 dozen books - i'd happily send a list or some links if you're interested). in short, the midwife model of care centered
on natural birth without unneccessary medical intervention is safe and a better match for my philosophies. care from a midwife is actually more likely to reduce the risks than add to them. home births with a midwife are statistically as safe as obstetrical deliveries of babies from similarly healthy pregnancies and controlled studies have shown home-birthed babies are healthier (higher apgars, reduced infections, less
frequent need of resuccitation) and their mothers have fewer complications. my midwife will do a lot of screening over the next months and if anything comes back questionably (or if the baby is born
prematurely or postdate) i will be sent to an obstetritian who can handle complications. i think what it really comes down to is that for a woman with a normal pregnancy, the best birth experience will be where the mother feels most comfortable and most confident with her (properly trained) care-giver, whether at home or in a hospital, by a midwife or an
obstetrician. now i just hope that my pregnancy is healthy so my baby and i can experience a natural, gentle birth.
...
i would really appreciate any feedback on how to make this better!
thanks in advance!
:D