Circumfetishist Request

Revamp · 06-30-2006, 02:15 PM

Hello there, I am uncertain if any of you are aware of this but on Wikipedia there is an article for "Foreskin fetish" but not "Circumcision fethish".

The reasoning behind this is that there has, thus far, been no published source for information about that sexual taste and thus it is considered "Unverifiable". The reason for this rule being applied so relentlessly in this case while not in countless others (there is an utterly unsourced article entitled "Freckle fetish", for instance) is due to a cabal of pro-circumcision wikipedians who are loathe to allow anything which could harm their cause exist upon that website.

Accordingly I was hoping that somebody here could possibly point me towards a published book that included a mention of, and hopefully some in depth detail on, those with a circumcision fetish. Unfortunately websites will not do (trust me, already tried it) so I need something which has been written down, typed out and published on paper.

I recall seeing one such example previously but can not recall where.

Microsoap · 06-30-2006, 02:19 PM

Not that THEY'D admit it themselves, but there's a well known pro-circ website C***list.com and if ANY ONE group that has a fetish with circumcision and be mentioned in the Wikipedia, it's THAT site!

(censored the name to be safe w/ the mods here)

phatchristy · 06-30-2006, 02:48 PM

Foreskin fetish? HUH, someone has a fetish when they like a naturally occuring part of the male anatomy?

:

Revamp · 06-30-2006, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phatchristy

Foreskin fetish? HUH, someone has a fetish when they like a naturally occuring part of the male anatomy?

:

Yes, apparently.

In an RIC culture possession in a form of deviancy and if aroused by this deviancy you are yourself a deviant. There are many things which this reminds me of but I shall not go into them, partially for fear of someone invoking Godwin's Law.

The point is that foreskin has been slandered to the extent that anyone displaying anything other than disgust must by extention be seen to enjoy all the qualities erroneously attributed to it and thus are rendered guilty of lust directed at the unclean.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Microsoap

Not that THEY'D admit it themselves, but there's a well known pro-circ website C***list.com and if ANY ONE group that has a fetish with circumcision and be mentioned in the Wikipedia, it's THAT site!

(censored the name to be safe w/ the mods here)

Not going to work, sadly. I attempted to use a site/groupt that actually called themselves "Circumsexuals" but to no avail, it must be published apparently. I would be more than happy to link both the aforementioned and the one which you referenced in a circumcision fetish article should it exist but sadly for the moment it does not and until I can find what I need it shall not.

TigerTail · 06-30-2006, 03:12 PM

Revamp, if anyone was capable of writing such a work & getting it published, I'd say it was you (With a frankly capable editor

).

I'm a little stunned they are not accepting the multitude of websites as evidence. Goodness, do they expect people with a pedophilic bent to be advertising their taste in coffee-table books? They're able to cloak it in medicalese, & use code phrases to alert one another, & push it on the web; that's bad enough.

Microsoap · 06-30-2006, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phatchristy

Foreskin fetish? HUH, someone has a fetish when they like a naturally occuring part of the male anatomy?

:

Hey, did you know I have a knee fetish or a lip fetish. I KNOW! Did you know I have an EARLOBE fetish! Yup, I still got all these body parts intact.

I guess in all actuality, one could have a foreskin fetish, just like one could be a "leg man" or a "breast man" and we aaaall know the common the foot fetish is out there.

But getting sexual satisfaction from cutting off such a body part would be an extreme fetish, yes. Just relate removing the cartilage of the earlobe to the male foreskin or the hood of the clitoral hood. ALL could be removed and still be able to function as a human being. In Western civilization, FGM seems cruel, but not MGM. And ANYWHERE on Earth, removing the earlobe is just wacky!!!

Fi. · 06-30-2006, 11:00 PM

Quote:

I guess in all actuality, one could have a foreskin fetish, just like one could be a "leg man" or a "breast man" and we aaaall know the common the foot fetish is out there.

Yep - I was thinking of foot fetish though. Very common and the foot is naturally occuring.

paquerette · 07-01-2006, 07:59 AM

I guess it's like comparing people with a foot fetish for an ordinary normal natural foot vs. people with a foot fetish for footbinding.

Revamp · 07-01-2006, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerTail

Revamp, if anyone was capable of writing such a work & getting it published, I'd say it was you (With a frankly capable editor

).

Wow!

Thanks...I am honestly and earnestly very flattered by that.

Quote:

I'm a little stunned they are not accepting the multitude of websites as evidence. Goodness, do they expect people with a pedophilic bent to be advertising their taste in coffee-table books? They're able to cloak it in medicalese, & use code phrases to alert one another, & push it on the web; that's bad enough.

Well to be fair to Wikipedia those are the rules. But it is notable that they are enforced in this case but not with Freckle Fetish as I mentioned before. Either funny or sinister and either the consequence of a group with something to hide or people who do not wish their argument to be sullied by the notion of pervy old men and women getting off over tortured babies, you take your pick.

Revamp · 07-01-2006, 06:54 PM

And please please please could anybody who knows of a book mentioning this get in touch and let me know?

It does not need to be immensely indepth it just needs to be in writing, on paper and published and thus verifiable. Without this we can not even get a Wikipedian acknowledgement of its existance: currently the page just redirects to the normal fetish* one and that is rather irksome.

*Yes yes, I know, an oxymoron. But you know what I mean...

Lula's Mom · 07-01-2006, 08:42 PM

It is tough to find anything, isn't it? I found this on http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/fetish-c.htm:

Quote:

Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices, by Brenda Love (Barricade Books, Inc., 1992). "More than 750 entries and 150 original illustrations on the world's strange sex activities". Under "Circumcision" (page 6): "Men sometimes incorporate their fear of circumcision into sex play as a means for arousal. They fake a circumcision by having their partner blindfold and bind them, placing a reservoir tipped condom and then slicing off the tip with a knife ... Women who are only sexually aroused by circumcised males are referred to as acucullophiles."

I used to have that book! After 4 moves, I don't know what happened to it.

Lula's Mom · 07-01-2006, 08:53 PM

They have that book at Amazon if you need it.

Revamp · 07-02-2006, 06:01 AM

My my!

Why thank you Lula's, was there any other text on the issue than what you presented?

That was the one which I was thinking of but I could not for the life of me recall which of the countless pro-intact sites had hosted that quote. Thank you ever so much for posting that up here, much appreciated.

Revamp · 07-02-2006, 06:05 AM

Acucullophilia article made, immensely short but at least it exists.

Circumcision Fetish article is pending me being told what else is said about them because I am uncertain that that is quite enough to work with. Once again my thanks to Lula's.

Lula's Mom · 07-02-2006, 07:47 AM

You're welcome! I have a Googling fetish myself (well, not quite.)

That was all there was on the webpage, and I just cannot find my copy to confirm that- but I remember most of the entries being short. There are a lot of unusual sex practices to cover!

I don't know if this will help, because it is a work of fiction (Wait, maybe not? It says "written by her husband after her death). But it is a published book: book

kxsiven · 07-02-2006, 09:31 AM

Yep, I know the gang guarding that part of Wikipedia - making sure that nothing leaks out about circ fetishism..

This goes little bit OT but have you ever visited http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/ ?

There is a blue menu bar on the right, click 'circumcision fetish' link ... just get ready to puke when you read the stories.

Revamp · 07-02-2006, 09:44 AM

Thank you for that too Lula's!

Following response received in the acucullophilia article's discussion page: "Is there any hope for this article being more than a WP: DICDEF? If not, I'll nominate it for WP:AfD. Jakew 12:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)"

He is very quick...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acucullophilia

Revamp · 07-02-2006, 09:48 AM

Oh and any direct support would be much appreciated! Contributions to the article are apparently neccessary but it all needs to be sourced and worded NPOV and I am a little too busy for that. A thousand thanks to anyone who has got enough and is willing to devote it to this, or circumfetishism which I have yet to even start on.

Remember that Jake is a stickler for the rules and you will need plenty of sourcing and not a word out of place.