US eyes increasing trade in endangered species - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2003, 08:08 PM - Thread Starter
Banned
 
Marlena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And the list goes on...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

Quote:
The Bush administration is proposing far-reaching changes to conservation policies that would allow hunters, circuses and the pet industry to kill, capture and import animals on the brink of extinction in other countries.

Giving Americans access to endangered animals, officials said, would feed the gigantic U.S. demand for live animals, skins, parts and trophies, and generate profits that would allow poor nations to pay for conservation of the remaining animals and their habitat.

This and other proposals that pursue conservation through trade would, for example, open the door for American trophy hunters to kill the endangered straight-horned markhor in Pakistan; license the pet industry to import the blue fronted Amazon parrot from Argentina; permit the capture of endangered Asian elephants for U.S. circuses and zoos; and partially resume the trade in African ivory. No U.S. endangered species would be affected.
Marlena is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-11-2003, 10:17 PM
 
JessicaS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 42,897
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Not all those who wander are lost 
JessicaS is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 01:26 AM
 
Quirky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 11,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


This pisses me off SO MUCH! Man, today is the day(or one of the days) I regretted quitting my job; this is my area of the law and I want to be out there on the front lines suing the pants off the US Fish and Wildlife Service! OTOH, I'm very glad I'm not at the Department of Justice any more where I might have had to defend this asinine rule in court.

This is all driven by Gale Norton's "let's be friendly to industry and weaken environmental laws like the ESA" mindset. I know the career people drafting this stuff and this is not what they would be coming up with if they had their druthers.

Not that FWS will pay any attention whatsoever, but here's the link to the Federal Register notice if anyone feels like writing them a nasty letter about this. The comment period closes November 10.

Come visit the NEW QuirkyBaby website -- earn QB Bucks rewards points for purchases, reviews, referrals, and more! Free US shipping on great brands of baby slings and carriers and FREE BabyLegs or babywearing mirror on orders of $100+. Take the QB Quiz for personalized advice!

Quirky is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 03:06 PM
 
TiredX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: it appears to be a handbasket
Posts: 20,029
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
No U.S. endangered species would be affected.
Well of course not, because the great white man is just doing the poor savages a favor by taking their endangered animals and killing them. :

kay

 

 

TiredX2 is offline  
Old 10-12-2003, 05:57 PM - Thread Starter
Banned
 
Marlena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,626
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the link, Jane!!
Marlena is offline  
Old 10-13-2003, 12:33 PM
 
kate42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 3,444
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That makes no sense. None.

The extinction of animals should have nothing to do with economics.

kate42 is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off