ALL MBRS: Please download & send this Complaint (re: disgusting pro-circ article) to Australian Press Council (Deadline 3 Mar 11) - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 1 Old 02-17-2011, 04:13 AM - Thread Starter
 
Minuteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

All Members,

Please download both of the documents from the following links, type your name and e-mail address in the appropriate fields of the Word document and then e-mail both documents to complaints@presscouncil.org.au with the subject 'Complaint Forms' (before 3 March 2011 0730 GMT).

http://rapidshare.com/files/448407846/Complaint_03Mar2011_.doc

http://rapidshare.com/files/448407994/AdelaideNow_2011__03Mar2011_.html

Important: The above procedure is based on the Australian Press Councils own guidelines and must be followed for a successful submission.

 

This is a formal complaint to Australia's press regulator about an article published in several Murdoch newspapers here entitled "Big snip heads for big debate, circumcision is rising in private procedures say doctors". This article, which comprises largely of quotes from doctors who make money performing circumcisions, can be read on-line here:

 

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/big-snip-heads-for-big-debate-circumcision-is-rising-in-private-procedures-say-doctors/story-e6frea8c-1225991989522

 

The main body of the complaint reads:

 

Quote:
The newspaper deliberately misled and misinformed readers through omission by failing to discuss the functions of the foreskin. Circumcision removes the most sexually sensitive parts of a boy’s penis, including the foreskin, the frenulum, and the ridged band of nerves [1]. The male foreskin is also designed to protect the glans of the penis throughout a man’s life, ensuring that the internal mucosal tissue remains moist and sensitive (much the same way that a woman’s clitoral hood protects the clitoris). In addition, the foreskin acts as a natural gliding mechanism to reduce chafing and dryness during intercourse [2]. Instead, it presented the commissioned views of doctors who gain financially performing circumcisions that there are vague "good reasons" to circumcise. The meaning and context of the final quote from Dr David Forbes has been obfuscated by the use of square brackets ("We may never change the view. It's hard to say when or if there will be [enough] evidence [to support it],").

There is a gross lack of balance in this article as the group most directly affected, infant boys, cannot represent themselves, no parents of intact (uncircumcised) boys were interviewed, no intact (uncircumcised) men happy with their status were interviewed, no men who resent being circumcised were interviewed and no doctors advocating alternatives to circumcision for preventing contraction of HIV/AIDS (e.g. condom use) were interviewed.

The right to privacy of two minors who had been circumcised was violated by naming them in this article.

It is impossible to distinguish fact from opinion in this article as it is not clearly stated that the doctors in this article profit financially performing (via Medicare subsidisation of the procedure [3]), and thus advocating for increased rates, of circumcision.

The article includes a disgusting and unrelated image of baby boy spread-eagled, which could reasonably be expected to cause offense.

There is gratuitous reference to religion in the article ('Circumcision is also widely accepted in some cultures for religious reasons and is seen as a rite of religious passage in the Jewish community.') which otherwise does not discuss circumcision as a religious practice, fails to mention the many religions that do not practice circumcision and consider the practice abhorrent (e.g Sikhism), does not quote religious officials of any faith, and does not quote Jewish parents who chose not to circumcise their son(s).

References:

1.    http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf
2.    http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
3.    https://www.medicareaustralia.gov.au/statistics/mbs_item.shtml

 

 

(Australian Press Council guidelines mandate a limit of 400 words)

 

Please leave a reply so that I may gauge the number of complaints sent (and to keep this post prominent until the deadline).

Thank you in anticipation.

Minuteman is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off