Bin Laden - Page 5 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-03-2011, 01:37 PM - Thread Starter
 
insidevoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,320
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

The reality here, however is that  there was not an effort to capture this man to bring him to trial.  He was unarmed.  You can not tell me that a couple dozen SEALS could not work to subdue and capture an unarmed, frail, elderly man.  

 

This was clearly, an assassination and the his death was not, truly necessary.  I have no doubt that the members of the military who carried this operation out were given directions to kill him.  That is very very different than the initial portrait of a man armed and using a woman as a shield.  Regardless of his atrocities in life, we have sunk to such a level that we chose to kill an unarmed man in the name of revenge.  Then we, as a nation, chose to celebrate this by dancing in the streets. 

 

insidevoice is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-03-2011, 01:38 PM
 
Chamomile Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West of the Sierras East of the Sea
Posts: 2,781
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by love4bob View Post

I also think it is easy to say what we would/would not do if we were in charge or what should/should not have happened, but until you are actually in that position I don't think that anyone can really say... as Obama is finding out with his presidency. He said a lot about the wars while campaigning, but I think he is finding the reality a lot different.


 

It is our job as members of a democracy...as people who vote...to pay attention to what is going on and to form our own analysis.  It is my job as a teacher and as a historian to look at what is happening now in the light of what has happened in the past and to compare them.  I will never believe that I just can't know something because I am not in charge (because those in charge tend to obfuscate) and I will never believe that we don't have a right to all the information we can get about everything (thank you Wikileaks!).  This is supposed to be why we have the media, to provide a check (and a reality check) on those in charge...I'm not so sure they do such a great job usually.

Chamomile Girl is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 02:03 PM
 
Thao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

No, I don't think that anymore than I appreciate having such worrds put in my mouth. Bush's actions were deplorable, but he was not a terrorist. The loss of innocent life was a result not of malicious intent, but incompetence and mismanagement. A difference in intent doesn't bring dead people back to life, but it can make a difference in a court of law when responsibility and fitting punishment are being determined. Bush is not equal to Osama, and as much as I disapprove of Bush, I think you are making an inappropriately black and white comparison.


If the difference between morally justified violence and terrorism is intentionally targeting civilians, it's not too hard to find examples in US history where we intentionally targeted civilians. Hiroshima and Nagasaki spring to mind, with somewhere between 100,000 - 200,000 civilians dead in those attacks (and it wasn't collateral damage - we targeted the entire city). We justify it by saying that we were at war; that we had to drop the bombs in order to shorten the war and save American lives, etc. Going back to the comparison between people who celebrated the 9/11 attacks and people who are celebrating OBL's death,  I imagine the people who celebrated the 9/11 attacks justified that attack in the same way we justify Hiroshima. They believed they were at war and a damaging strike had been made against the enemy.

 

I don't see any moral difference between the people who publicly celebrated the 9/11 attacks and the people who are publicly celebrating OBL's death, because in both cases the people are celebrating based on beliefs about why the violence was justified.

 

I'm really glad OBL is gone. But I don't think it is appropriate to celebrate it. We live in a complicated world and sometimes it is necessary do bad things. But we should always keep in mind that they are bad things, not something to cheer about.

 

Quote:
Take that kid who shot up Virginia Tech....if crowds of people had gathered around his body at the scene and spit on him, kicked him, pointed and sang "hey hey hey good-bye," and danced on the quad, would we think that was appropriate? Would we not have expected the authorities to step in and say, "Hey, we don't do that." We might understand that people were freaked out of their minds and reacted badly in the moment, but we don't condone that.

 

This.

 

Thao is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 02:50 PM
 
Subhuti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jeta Grove
Posts: 1,467
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I, too, am very disturbed to hear that Bin Ladin wasn't armed.  After the years of work and all the expertise that went into this operation, I find it hard to believe that they couldn't restrain themselves from killing an unarmed man.  

 

Capture him, try him, and sentence him.  Don't, as much as we are all relieved to have OBL out of the picture, just go in an assassinate him! 


Kids. I got two of 'em.
Subhuti is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 02:54 PM
 
moonfirefaery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 2,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Thao, I do see a moral difference; we were trying to save lives, and the people attacking and then celebrating on 9/11 weren't. I also don't think that taking out a murderer is a bad thing. I have never approved of the Hiroshima & nagasaki bombings, but I don't think it's comparable to stopping a murderer from doing more murder.

 

insidevoice - This was not a revenge killing; it was a matter of national security to prevent this man specifically from doing further harm by inciting his many followers to violence again.

 

love4bob - I agree that it is possible to support one and not the other, and I agree that just because we have done wrong in some cases that doesn't mean we weren't right to take out bin Laden. Well-said.


fambedsingle2.gif Heather, 25, single mom to Corbin, 5, and Orin, 3  uc.jpg  delayedvax.gif  nocirc.gif
Oh how I miss the days of femalesling.GIF  nak.gifcd.gif  
moonfirefaery is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 02:57 PM
 
moonfirefaery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 2,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Subhuti View Post

I, too, am very disturbed to hear that Bin Ladin wasn't armed.  After the years of work and all the expertise that went into this operation, I find it hard to believe that they couldn't restrain themselves from killing an unarmed man.  

 

Capture him, try him, and sentence him.  Don't, as much as we are all relieved to have OBL out of the picture, just go in an assassinate him! 



 With all the conflicting information I won't condemn it just yet. Even if he wasn't armed, if it appeared that he was, I would understand taking him out. The goal was to get him, one way or another, without any of our men dying, and if we had any suspicion that he was armed and could harm our men, we did right by not giving hiim the chance.


fambedsingle2.gif Heather, 25, single mom to Corbin, 5, and Orin, 3  uc.jpg  delayedvax.gif  nocirc.gif
Oh how I miss the days of femalesling.GIF  nak.gifcd.gif  
moonfirefaery is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 03:15 PM
 
journeymom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Having a Gilly Water with McGonagall
Posts: 7,417
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)

 

Quote:
Then we, as a nation, chose to celebrate this by dancing in the streets. 

 

NO NO NO, we as a nation most certainly did not do that.  Do not put me in that category.  PLEASE note that the vast majority of the US's 308 million people did not dance in the streets. 


Someone moved my effing cheese.
journeymom is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 03:29 PM
 
MamaofLiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by insidevoice View Post

The reality here, however is that  there was not an effort to capture this man to bring him to trial.  He was unarmed.  You can not tell me that a couple dozen SEALS could not work to subdue and capture an unarmed, frail, elderly man.  

 

This was clearly, an assassination and the his death was not, truly necessary.  I have no doubt that the members of the military who carried this operation out were given directions to kill him.  That is very very different than the initial portrait of a man armed and using a woman as a shield.  Regardless of his atrocities in life, we have sunk to such a level that we chose to kill an unarmed man in the name of revenge.  Then we, as a nation, chose to celebrate this by dancing in the streets. 

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by journeymom View Post

 

NO NO NO, we as a nation most certainly did not do that.  Do not put me in that category.  PLEASE note that the vast majority of the US's 308 million people did not dance in the streets. 


I think insidevoice was maybe saying that its perceived that we as a nation are celebrating by dancing in the streets b/c of what is shown on media outlets. I think people from other countries could very well think that b/c that's all they see. But I totally agree with you - I do not want to be put in that category. Definitely, definitely not. It's great that you point that out. 

 

MamaofLiam is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 03:43 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hell on ESPN they had coverage of people dancing in the streets, Ohio state kids swimming in a lake or something and people just going crazy...

 

Half the people on my FB were doing little war dances online about they would love to piss on his dead face...WTH is wrong with people that they say and do this stuff...It is just so...i don't know, I don't even have a word for it.

 

I am still bothered by what I saw on the TV with people celebrating like we had won WWII all over again. I get that it was a moral victory but as other PP's have pointed out why are we celebrating murder? What exactly about that is ok? I still just can't wrap my brain around it.

Ldavis24 is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 03:54 PM
 
Thao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Thao, I do see a moral difference; we were trying to save lives, and the people attacking and then celebrating on 9/11 weren't. I also don't think that taking out a murderer is a bad thing. I have never approved of the Hiroshima & nagasaki bombings, but I don't think it's comparable to stopping a murderer from doing more murder.


You've packed an awful lot of assumptions into that sentence. Were we trying to save lives (the official version; dubious considering we had already defeated Germany and Japan was pretty weak) or were we testing out an awesome new weapon for the word to see? And how do you know the people celebrating 9/11 didn't think the attack might save the lives? I remember the celebrations mostly being centered in Palestinian territories, where a lot of lives have been lost in the ongoing conflict with Israel, which receives US support. It's not unreasonable that those celebrating may have hoped that US support for Israel would weaken as a result of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in less of their people dead. There was also a lot of resentment at the time about the deaths caused by the US-led embargo against Iraq; again, it is reasonable that they might have hoped the US would pull out of the area resulting in less dead Iraqis.

 

That's not how it turned out, of course. But when you say the people celebrating the 9/11 attack weren't trying to save lives, you are making huge assumptions about their intentions. Earlier, when talking about Bush's intentions re: the Iraq invasion, you said it is important to have clear proof of his intentions before judging him. But it seems you are not applying the same standard when judging the intentions of the people who celebrated 9/11. My guess is that there was probably a wide variety of intentions involved, from people who hoped that the attack would cause the US to stop facilitating things that were killing their people, to people hellbent on vengeance who felt like a big victory had been scored. From what I've seen, the people celebrating OBL's death have the same range of intentions.

 

I agree that stopping a murderer from doing more murder is a Good Thing. Stopping the murderer by murdering him, however,  is achieving a Good Thing through committing a Bad Thing. I think it is wrong to celebrate a Bad Thing, no matter how necessary it may have been.

 

Thao is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 04:01 PM
 
monkey's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

So in the VA Tech situation, where taking out the shooter absolutely saved lives, do you feel a celebration of his death--complete w/ waving the school's flag, singing their school fight song and the "Goodbye song," and high-fives--would be appropriate?

Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Thao, I do see a moral difference; we were trying to save lives, and the people attacking and then celebrating on 9/11 weren't.

monkey's mom is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 05:35 PM
 
moonfirefaery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 2,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

monkey's mom: My life wasn't threatened by that particular shooter, but if it was being threatened by him, I would celebrate him no longer being a threat, yes, especially if my life had been threatened by him for ten long years, with billions of taxpayer's dollars being spent on finding him that was bankrupting our country and the whole world fearing him as well.  I feel sorrow that this young man's issues escalated to the point that he was a danger to others and needed to be taken out to prevent further casualties, same as I do for Osama, but I do celebrate that both were taken out--not as a celebration of death, but as a celebration of a threat removed.  As I've repeatedly said, I'd have been just as happy had Osama been captured instead, and I'm sore most Americans would have as well. I cheer that we had the guts to eliminate this threat, even if it meant killing him.

 

Thao, no part of that sentence was an assumption; it was what I see, what I think, and what I approve, in other words my opinion. I doubt the people celebrating 9/11 thought that it would stop America from taking any more lives; I give the world more credit than to be that obtuse. Those people weren't celebrating the deaths of murderers, but of innocents, and they probably weren't thinking "Yes, we've knocked down the WTF; now no more lives will be lost to American politics!" I don't believe the people of the world, given America's history, are naive enough to believe that the 911 attacks would bring peace. Attacking America never, ever brings peace, until we've attacked back. I'm not making an assumption about their intention; I'm stating that I find it improbable that they believed this terrorist act would change our actions in the Middle East for the good. In any case, it was the murder of innocents, and what we did to Osama was not as he was not innocent in any way, shape or form. he wasn't murdered.


fambedsingle2.gif Heather, 25, single mom to Corbin, 5, and Orin, 3  uc.jpg  delayedvax.gif  nocirc.gif
Oh how I miss the days of femalesling.GIF  nak.gifcd.gif  
moonfirefaery is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:09 PM
 
Irishmommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: In the bat cave with heartmama
Posts: 45,457
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arduinna View Post

If you can't tell the difference between cheering an act of terrorism where over 3000 people died, then there is nothing more for me to say.

 


One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Irishmommy is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:15 PM
 
Chamomile Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West of the Sierras East of the Sea
Posts: 2,781
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

monkey's mom: My life wasn't threatened by that particular shooter, but if it was being threatened by him, I would celebrate him no longer being a threat, yes, especially if my life had been threatened by him for ten long years, with billions of taxpayer's dollars being spent on finding him that was bankrupting our country and the whole world fearing him as well.  I feel sorrow that this young man's issues escalated to the point that he was a danger to others and needed to be taken out to prevent further casualties, same as I do for Osama, but I do celebrate that both were taken out--not as a celebration of death, but as a celebration of a threat removed.  As I've repeatedly said, I'd have been just as happy had Osama been captured instead, and I'm sore most Americans would have as well. I cheer that we had the guts to eliminate this threat, even if it meant killing him.

 

Thao, no part of that sentence was an assumption; it was what I see, what I think, and what I approve, in other words my opinion. I doubt the people celebrating 9/11 thought that it would stop America from taking any more lives; I give the world more credit than to be that obtuse. Those people weren't celebrating the deaths of murderers, but of innocents, and they probably weren't thinking "Yes, we've knocked down the WTF; now no more lives will be lost to American politics!" I don't believe the people of the world, given America's history, are naive enough to believe that the 911 attacks would bring peace. Attacking America never, ever brings peace, until we've attacked back. I'm not making an assumption about their intention; I'm stating that I find it improbable that they believed this terrorist act would change our actions in the Middle East for the good. In any case, it was the murder of innocents, and what we did to Osama was not as he was not innocent in any way, shape or form. he wasn't murdered.

No matter how deftly you can apparently twist morality you cannot make that assertation.  He was killed in cold blood...he was unarmed.  He was murdered, no matter if you call it just or not.

 

Here is the problem I have with your logic.  You seem to be holding people to two different standards dependant on if you think they are "good guys" or "bad guys".  So because Osama is a bad guy the US should be allowed to take any action they want to make him dead?  Yes?  What if some other country in the world makes a determination that an American citizen is a bad guy who has caused the deaths of thousands in their country (*cough* Henry Kissinger *cough*)?  Should they be allowed to take the same liberties...to send secret military folks into the USA to kill their bad guy?  Do you see the chaos and brutality that would ensue if all countries took the same liberties as the United States?

 

This is a real situation and it is the reason why extradition law exists.  It should not matter how "bad" the bad guy (because who can really know...unless there is a trial).  We all need to follow international law or they risk sending a message to the rest of the world that the USA feels they should be exempt.  Which is a message that is already out there and one that already causes much bitterness and resentfulness.

Chamomile Girl is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:24 PM
 
MusicianDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tuponia
Posts: 8,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Thao, I do see a moral difference; we were trying to save lives, 


Trying to save American lives, to hell with all those non-American, non-White, non-Christian lives.

 

At least thats how it looks to the rest of the world.


malesling.GIFMutant Papa to DD (12)hippie.gif and DS (2)babyf.gif, married to DHribbonrainbow.gif
If it looks like I'm trying to pick a fight... I'm not, I'm rarely that obvious.hammer.gif
MusicianDad is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:31 PM
 
moonfirefaery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 2,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes, and it's unfortunate that they see it like that, but it's not the reality. The reality is we're not targeting religion, race, or nationality; we're targeting terrorists, which most of the world would be happier without. Most of the world seems to agree that the capture of bin Laden was good and that he was a threat to global security, according to the statements made by their leaders. No one thinks it's a good thing that they have to worry about a bomb going off in the cafe during their lunch.


fambedsingle2.gif Heather, 25, single mom to Corbin, 5, and Orin, 3  uc.jpg  delayedvax.gif  nocirc.gif
Oh how I miss the days of femalesling.GIF  nak.gifcd.gif  
moonfirefaery is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:34 PM
 
moonfirefaery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 2,994
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Chamomile Girl,

A murder is an unlawful kill. The kill was lawful; therefore, it was not murder.

Please stop putting words in my mouth, because the good/bad guys terminology is yours alone.

We are at war with people that take much more liberal liberties than we do.

Irishmommy - A freedom fighter fights back against an oppressive regime by attacking the military and government, not the innocent citizens who have very little to do with the real running of the country.


fambedsingle2.gif Heather, 25, single mom to Corbin, 5, and Orin, 3  uc.jpg  delayedvax.gif  nocirc.gif
Oh how I miss the days of femalesling.GIF  nak.gifcd.gif  
moonfirefaery is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:43 PM
 
monkey's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

monkey's mom: My life wasn't threatened by that particular shooter, but if it was being threatened by him, I would celebrate him no longer being a threat, yes, especially if my life had been threatened by him for ten long years, with billions of taxpayer's dollars being spent on finding him that was bankrupting our country and the whole world fearing him as well.  I feel sorrow that this young man's issues escalated to the point that he was a danger to others and needed to be taken out to prevent further casualties, same as I do for Osama, but I do celebrate that both were taken out--not as a celebration of death, but as a celebration of a threat removed.  As I've repeatedly said, I'd have been just as happy had Osama been captured instead, and I'm sore most Americans would have as well. I cheer that we had the guts to eliminate this threat, even if it meant killing him.

But he WAS killed. And, to me (and many others) that dictates a certain level of behavior that is decent and civilized--behavior that is not the same as one might respond to capture.

 

I was personally impacted by Bin Laden's actions. My house shook when the Pentagon was hit. I was 7 mos. pregnant, about to head into DC (Library of Congress) right past the Pentagon. My friends and neighbors were first responders. I, literally, thought I was going to die that day. I left work to go home to be with my husband because if I was going to die, it was going to be with him. My sil was in a gov't building trying to get home to her babies--we couldn't get in touch with her. We were hearing that the White House had been hit, the FAA building in NoVA had been hit, the phones didn't work, rumors were flying, traffic was insane, etc. It was the most terrifying thing I've ever experienced.

 

And even if that day that the person responsible had been found and killed, it still would have crossed all lines of decency to party in the streets over the news. Just like it does 10 years and trillions of dollars later.
 

 

monkey's mom is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:55 PM
 
babygirlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

If a dog bites a child we are quick to kill the dog. A man kills thousands of people and we should give him a fair chance and the benefit of the doubt?

 

I must say I am glad it's not me making these decisions.

babygirlie is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:58 PM
 
MusicianDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tuponia
Posts: 8,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Yes, and it's unfortunate that they see it like that, but it's not the reality. The reality is we're not targeting religion, race, or nationality; we're targeting terrorists, which most of the world would be happier without. Most of the world seems to agree that the capture of bin Laden was good and that he was a threat to global security, according to the statements made by their leaders. No one thinks it's a good thing that they have to worry about a bomb going off in the cafe during their lunch.


Tell that to the tens of thousands of civilians (men, women and children) who were killed as a direct result of US activity fighting "terrorists".

 


malesling.GIFMutant Papa to DD (12)hippie.gif and DS (2)babyf.gif, married to DHribbonrainbow.gif
If it looks like I'm trying to pick a fight... I'm not, I'm rarely that obvious.hammer.gif
MusicianDad is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 06:58 PM
 
MamaofLiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Yes, and it's unfortunate that they see it like that, but it's not the reality. The reality is we're not targeting religion, race, or nationality; we're targeting terrorists, which most of the world would be happier without. Most of the world seems to agree that the capture of bin Laden was good and that he was a threat to global security, according to the statements made by their leaders. No one thinks it's a good thing that they have to worry about a bomb going off in the cafe during their lunch.


How do you get to decide what the reality is? There are others who would assert that the reality is the direct opposite of what you are saying and that the US are terrorists. And as far as what the US is targeting: who knows what the US is targeting... There is so much the US has done that has me headscratch.gif. It's just not as simple as "good guys" (e.g., US) and "bad guys" (e.g., terrorists). BTW I can tell you for a fact that there is growing sentiment around the world that the US is NOT the good guy. How do you make sense of that? And as a pp pointed out, you can't hold people to 2 different standards depending on whether you think they are "good" vs "bad". I think the problem I'm having understanding your view point is that I'm not seeing you acknowledge other perspectives outside of the pro-USA bubble. You're certainly entitled to think whatever you want, but limiting yourself to only one perspective is limiting your own understanding.

 

BTW the vast majority of quotes out there that I've seen about Bin Laden have been leaders of nations who are strong US allies, i.e. agreeable to the US's viewpoint. But that's not the entire world. Has anyone else heard what other non-Christian, white nations think about Bin Laden's death? I'm curious...

MamaofLiam is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:01 PM
 
monkey's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by babygirlie View Post

If a dog bites a child we are quick to kill the dog. A man kills thousands of people and we should give him a fair chance and the benefit of the doubt?


A "fair chance?" What, exactly, is the alternative? Vigilante killings based on UNfair chances?

 

Are we civilized people here, or what?
 

 

monkey's mom is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:01 PM
 
Thao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington state
Posts: 2,094
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

(For some reason I can't get the quote button to work.)

 

"Thao, no part of that sentence was an assumption; it was what I see, what I think, and what I approve, in other words my opinion."

 

Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but some opinions are based on fact and some on assumption. So far, all you've given to back up your opinions is assumptions about what you think people thought. I would agree with you that probably nobody thought the 9/11 attack would bring peace, but then again nobody I've talked to or heard talking about OBL's death thinks it will bring peace either. In the short run it will almost certainly increase the risk of a terrorist attack. But we hope that it will weaken AlQueda (sp?) and in the long run make terrorists think twice about attacking us. Why would it be improbable for a Palestinian to have a similar train of thought on 9/11? After all, Reagan pulled the Marines out of Lebanon shortly after the terrible attack on our barracks there. Terrorist violence is sometimes effective.

 

You are right that the 9/11 attack was against innocents, whereas OBL was most definitely not innocent. That's why I brought up the Hiroshima bombing, where we attacked innocents. Yet we don't call that a terrorist attack. In the same way, I imagine the people who supported the 9/11 attack did not consider it a terrorist attack, but rather justified violence against the population of a country  which they are at war with. It's all a matter of perspective. Which is why I think the only consistent way to deal with such things is to say killing is Bad, period, and never to be celebrated. But sometimes necessary.

Thao is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:04 PM
 
MamaofLiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Wow... this thread just really erupted! lol lurk.gif

MamaofLiam is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:06 PM
 
babygirlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Actually he's killed hundreds of thousands of non-american, non-white, non christian people also.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MusicianDad View Post




Trying to save American lives, to hell with all those non-American, non-White, non-Christian lives.

 

At least thats how it looks to the rest of the world.



 

babygirlie is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:10 PM
 
babygirlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


No, he was anything but civilized. It was not vigilante it was soldiers.
Most muslims despised him. Most of the universe despised him. You would have to be crazy to show this turd any respect.

 

babygirlie is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:12 PM
 
MamaofLiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by babygirlie View Post


No, he was anything but civilized. It was not vigilante it was soldiers.
Most muslims despised him. Most of the universe despised him. You would have to be crazy to show this turd any respect.

 


What are you talking about? headscratch.gif

 

the definition of the word vigilante is: done violently and summarily, without recourse to lawful procedures adj or noun any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, asby avenging a crime.

 

MamaofLiam is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:14 PM
 
monkey's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,922
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by babygirlie View Post


No, he was anything but civilized. It was not vigilante it was soldiers.
Most muslims despised him. Most of the universe despised him. You would have to be crazy to show this turd any respect.

 


No, are WE civilized?

 

And that answer has nothing to do with how we are treated, what is done to us, or how uncivilized anyone else is.

 

Are WE civilized?

 

Are WE people who do things fairly and justly and behave with dignity and respect no matter what?
 

 

monkey's mom is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:15 PM
 
eclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 7,440
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonfirefaery View Post

Chamomile Girl,

A murder is an unlawful kill. The kill was lawful; therefore, it was not murder.

.


I think the lawfulness of this kill has yet to be established. Is it lawful because we (meaning the US Government) say it's lawful?
eclipse is offline  
Old 05-03-2011, 07:19 PM
 
MusicianDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tuponia
Posts: 8,928
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

     Quote:

Originally Posted by babygirlie View Post


No, he was anything but civilized. It was not vigilante it was soldiers.
Most muslims despised him. Most of the universe despised him. You would have to be crazy to show this turd any respect.

 


So because he's the bad guy that give the US the right to stoop to his level? Why the hell should I show any respect either parties in this matter? The US's response to Bin Laden has come off as very "Kill 'em. Kill 'em all!"

 

If you want to tout yourself as being above the person you hate, you have to actually be above the person that you hate.

 


malesling.GIFMutant Papa to DD (12)hippie.gif and DS (2)babyf.gif, married to DHribbonrainbow.gif
If it looks like I'm trying to pick a fight... I'm not, I'm rarely that obvious.hammer.gif
MusicianDad is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off