allergy testing...good or bad idea? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
#1 of 6 Old 04-10-2005, 12:31 AM - Thread Starter
Finch's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NC!
Posts: 9,522
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
We have just gotten through another round of elimination diet with my son to confirm an egg allergy. So far he's allergic to cow's milk, cinnamon, and eggs. But not so allergic to eggs and milk that he can't eat stuff like little crackers, etc., that have egg or milk products in them. Just can't drink cow's milk or have pudding or drinkable yogurt or have cow's milk mixed in his food (weird). Cinnamon will give him a reaction every time, no matter what.

So anyway, since we've already confirmed 3 food allergies in him, would allergy testing be a good idea? I'm thinking we should go ahead and do it as I know food allergies can affect behavior, and we already have behavioral challenges. Plus I hate seeing him get the horrible diaper rash that he gets whenever he has an allergic reaction. It BLED last time, it was so bad. My poor baby.
Finch is offline  
#2 of 6 Old 04-10-2005, 12:36 AM
janerose's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: my little house in the woods
Posts: 1,918
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hmmm, interesting question! Well, from the perspective of someone who was regularly tested for allergies from age 4 on (and given allergy shots too...but that's a different deal...) I can't say I had a negative experience with them. In my case I had chronic ear infections & sore throats. Being tested for allergies allowed me to avoid having tubes put into my ears & probably having my tonsils removed.

I'm interested to hear what others have to say about this topic!

janerose is offline  
#3 of 6 Old 04-10-2005, 06:39 PM
thoesly's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In our case, allergy testing was a good idea because it pointed us to foods we had not even suspected. Even taking into account the high incidence of false positives for the skin test and false negatives for the blood test (I think I have that right), it was worthwhile because it showed me some other things that I needed to eliminate. I never would have suspected my son is allergic to all types of yeast (including the kind that is sometimes added to "natural" juices to enhance sweetness) if it hadn't been for the test. I didn't have Doris Rapp's book at the time, so "traditional" testing is what we did.

You might also look into NAET -- I am doing so now and can't give you any good details, but I know there are threads about it in the allergy forum and other places.
thoesly is offline  
#4 of 6 Old 04-10-2005, 08:49 PM - Thread Starter
Finch's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NC!
Posts: 9,522
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I learn something every time I post here..... I didn't even know there was an allergy forum!! I'll be popping in over there to check it out. Thanks!!!

And thanks for the feedback.
Finch is offline  
#5 of 6 Old 04-12-2005, 07:23 PM
Brandi's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Our son had some type of food allergy when he was 1. But, at 1, we had tried several things and tried figuring it out on our own. We thought it was milk, but then decided it must be eggs. He had a blood test and it came back positive for both eggs and milk. Now, we were sure that he wasn't allergic to milk becuase of all of the testing we had done on our own with different foods. So, then we had the skin test done and it came back with the same results. He was not allergic to milk though, even though he tested positive.

I guess, if it would help put you in the right direction on what your child is allergic to, then it might be a good idea. I just would worry about the false results that can happen a lot with kids. I don't know why it is that way, but you just have to be prepared for that. Also, the blood test would be a lot easier than the skin test. The skin one, you have to have a scratch mark for every single food you are testing.
Brandi is offline  
#6 of 6 Old 04-20-2005, 08:46 PM
HaveWool~Will Felt's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,020
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
There is a major diff. between the allergy testing that MD's do and naturopathic dr's do.
The testin that naturopathic dr's do is much more complete....they will also test for food sensitivites as well.....

HaveWool~Will Felt is offline  

Quick Reply
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off