My freind just had twins but is this normal? - Page 2 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 41 Old 07-14-2007, 09:22 PM
 
MaryJaneLouise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toddler Heater Blanket
Posts: 3,188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's Karen Gromada's website:

http://www.karengromada.com/

She does need a copy of Mothering Multiples.

Twin boys 04/2005 : Support breastfeeding rights at FirstRight.Org : warrior
Face the rear for MORE than a year! Toddlers' necks are safest in a rear facing carseat
MaryJaneLouise is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#32 of 41 Old 07-14-2007, 09:47 PM - Thread Starter
 
hipumpkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If she should happen to email one of the people who gave me addresses I will ask them to let her know about the book b/c she did already tell me that she read 2 books and took a hospital class and well she's got that nurse. So I would feel very pushy.
She did email back asking some other questions..about pacifiers and such so she hasn't crossed me off the list of adivce people b/c I expressed a concern about the scheduling. I want to to keep the communication open...maybe I will wait a few days and say that I happened upon that book.

The first rule of homeschooling: water the plants! :
hipumpkins is offline  
#33 of 41 Old 07-18-2007, 05:37 PM
 
Periwinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


No, it's not normal assuming they were full term(ish).

Mine were on a strict schedule during the first several weeks - I set a timer to feed them every 2 hours, otherwise they wouldn't get enough calories. Eventually they outgrew the need for that (around 1-2 weeks after their original due date I guess) and moved into demand feeding.

ETA -- And clearly if they wanted to eat before their 2 hours were up, we were delighted to feed them!
Periwinkle is offline  
#34 of 41 Old 07-18-2007, 07:04 PM
 
Zadee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Slightly north of sane
Posts: 711
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I demand fed twins and didn't get anything resembling a schedule (unless you count "1:00 - stare blearily at the babies; 2:00 - stare blearily at the babies" a schedule) until they were fairly old. I didn't lose my mind and not only didn't lose my supply I was able to build it from needing to supplement to NOT needing to supplement.

It wasn't fun. Anyone who has fun the first few months with twins is a better woman than I.

I know a woman who hired a night nurse, wondered why her supply was never enough and why she was unable to nurse after about 4 months. I didn't feel close enough to her to tell her that that sleep she felt she needed was going to ruin her supply (and now she, Miss Mainstream, is co-sleeping because she needs her sleep so, hey). Sigh. It's hard.

Anyway, after this incoherent ramble I third (or fourth) the Mothering Multiples recommendation.

Mostly sane mother to twins.
Zadee is offline  
#35 of 41 Old 07-18-2007, 11:05 PM
 
fivi2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I seriously debated posting - I deleted a post a few days ago. I am more mainstream than many of you (no, I have never read babywise), but some of the reactions on this thread have really bothered me.

First - her milk will not necessarily dry up. The NICU would not allow me to nurse for a week and after that it was infrequent at best. I pumped (and pumped). Once the babies came home, we tried, but for a variety of reasons, direct nursing did not work for us. I pumped for almost a year. I never had to supplement with formula or anything else. I had enough milk for both babies and was able to freeze a ton. Yes, I was fortunate, but the blanket statements about how she will never be able to nurse if this doesn't stop have really rubbed me the wrong way.

Second, as a pp mentioned, sometimes the babies need to be on a schedule. The NICU sent them home on a schedule. My babies showed no hunger cues. I had to feed them on schedule to make sure they ate enough. period. If they ever did show a hunger cue, of course I fed them (and yes, I offered both food even if only one showed a sign), but that rarely happened. I would never tell a mother that she HAD to put hers on a schedule, but I would certainly never say that schedules are always bad.

My point is that it all depends on her situation. I don't know this woman's credentials - she may be a quack. BUT the kneejerk reactions aren't helpful when none of us know the situation. Just my opinion.
fivi2 is offline  
#36 of 41 Old 07-19-2007, 12:13 AM
 
michellyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 284
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivi2 View Post
I am more mainstream than many of you (no, I have never read babywise),
First, let me say that this is not an attack, but a response. I also am more mainstream in some areas. The fact that you haven't read Babywise may be one reason that you don't react as strongly to this. I know many people who believe your children will not turn out right if you don't put them on a schedule because Babywise essentially teaches that failure to do so is spoiling them and being a child controlled home. I was initially influenced by Babywise (and even after rejecting it, I've found myself misinformed by many of its teachings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivi2 View Post
First - her milk will not necessarily dry up. The NICU would not allow me to nurse for a week and after that it was infrequent at best. I pumped (and pumped). Once the babies came home, we tried, but for a variety of reasons, direct nursing did not work for us. I pumped for almost a year. I never had to supplement with formula or anything else. I had enough milk for both babies and was able to freeze a ton. Yes, I was fortunate, but the blanket statements about how she will never be able to nurse if this doesn't stop have really rubbed me the wrong way.
I think some of the comments people have made here were overstated, but it can/does significantly damage one's ability to nurse and/or confidence in nursing. BTW, you are an awesome mommy to do all that pumping and feeding--it must have been exhausting! I barely had time to nurse, much less add pumping and cleaning bottles to it. Most people who encourage scheduling do not encourage pumping as much as would be necessary to keep up with a baby's demands, and as I'm sure you're aware, most people's bodies produce less with pumping than with the baby/babies nursing. I had a really hard time pumping, just trying to get my supply up. My body just doesn't like to let out much for a pump. I think that some of my wrong ideas (initially from Babywise) kept me from realizing just how often I needed to nurse to generate enough supply. I'd thought that nursing more often would only cause my babies to get the same amount of milk in smaller meals, not tell my body that I needed to produce more milk.

Quote:
If they ever did show a hunger cue, of course I fed them (and yes, I offered both food even if only one showed a sign), but that rarely happened. I would never tell a mother that she HAD to put hers on a schedule, but I would certainly never say that schedules are always bad.
This is where most schedulers would disagree with you. The theory is that the parent knows what the child needs more than the child. If the child has been fed (on the prescribed schedule), changed, and had play time, the parent knows he cannot need to be fed again. Thus, the crying must be because the child needs to sleep (or because the child is trying to assume control of the home). I think almost everyone would agree that schedules aren't ALWAYS bad; however, this schedule seems very suspicious. If the schedule was necessitated because of sucking problems, why should the mother sit and watch the first week, only starting to do things the second week? What "smelled bad" to the previous posters was the way she was going about scheduling; it just sounded so similar to the way women are advised NOT to trust their mothering instincts and to trust the book(s) ways of doing things. I feel as if Babywise killed some of my mothering instincts. I don't know how to read babies' cues too well--I just keep going through the list of possible needs until something works.

I understand that no one knows the situation exactly, but enough was known for me to fear for her. Her children will survive, but it's just unfortunate that she's not aware how those methods could damage her ability to provide enough milk for her twins.
michellyn is offline  
#37 of 41 Old 07-19-2007, 12:46 AM
 
Ellie'sMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Foundation of the Gator Nation
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Since it sounds like she is interested in other aspects of AP, please direct her to the AP multiples yahoo group

These women are such a wealth of information. Karen Gromada, the author of the LLL Mothering Multiples book, posts on there regularly. She can definitely provide some expert advice.

Or direct her here! There are lots of MoMs here who have nursed our babies on demand. Sure it's hectic and sometimes really hard (I had low supply and had to pump and supplement with formula from 4 months to around a year), but what part of having twins isn't? If anything the constant nursing was a great excuse to take a rest from all the laundry!

Trying to get my bearings...
Ellie'sMom is offline  
#38 of 41 Old 07-19-2007, 12:54 AM
 
tiffer23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What about telling her about this board? Then maybe she'd see that lots of moms with twins do it differently?
tiffer23 is offline  
#39 of 41 Old 07-19-2007, 01:32 AM
 
fivi2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Michellyn - I appreciate your response. I just wanted to add another perspective. Many people (like me) read these threads in the future (?) when they are searching for answers. I personally thought that some of the reactions were a little dramatic given the information we have. I agree that babywise is bad (although I have not read it, I have heard much about it). and I am so sorry that it caused you so many problems. But I don't think the OP mentioned babywise - I think that was someone else's immediate response when they heard the word schedule. So we don't know if this is a "babywise schedule" like you described or if it is a medical schedule - so the babies get enough food. That is all I wanted to point out. It seems like sometimes people hear certain words and assume the worst without knowing the situation. (and, no, I have no idea why the parents can't help in the first week). If a friend of mine had posted this question (I pumped and had the babies on a "schedule" - again only because they did not show hunger cues for a long time) I would imagine she would have gotten similar reactions, but the situation would not have been what people are assuming. If that makes any sense at all!
fivi2 is offline  
#40 of 41 Old 07-19-2007, 03:33 AM
 
kalynnsmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midlothian, TX
Posts: 463
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Oh I do think that "schedules" are sometimes appropriate. I forgot to mention that my babies, which were 6 weeks premature, were on a schedule. Meaning, the MOST they could go without food was 2-3 hours. If I didn't wake them, they would not get enough and continue to lose weight as they were doing. And this schedule was more for the nurses I think. I found out that a few nurses weren't feeding them for FOUR HOURS (I guess they didn't realize that EBM is different from formula)

But from the OP, it sounds like that this isn't the case..I could be wrong of course.
kalynnsmom is offline  
#41 of 41 Old 07-24-2007, 11:38 PM
 
TripMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,420
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by torio View Post
Well, plenty of us nurse twins on demand and haven't lost our minds yet.
And furthermore . . . . its totally possible to nurse multiples on a schedule too? I did it with triplets for 6 months. The key is to get them BF - no matter how you do it . . . .

TripMom . . . . . loving mom : to DS (7) and BBG (4.5)
TripMom is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off