TTC after 40 -- am I nuts - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Thread Tools
#1 of 11 Old 10-22-2013, 05:25 PM - Thread Starter
Momma Aimee's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: deep in South Texas and ready to go home
Posts: 9,439
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I am 41.


I realize that the rate of birth effects, especially Downs, really skyrockets after 40.


We have two boys -- in less than a month they will 6 and 8 -- how THAT happened i am not really sure.


Dh and are currently CTA -- but i am really thinking about TTC


thoughts on TTC after 40.


i have a few dear friends that have birthed after 40 (after 42 in one case) but all of the babies have been surprises -- not planned.


not sure how i feel about TRYING when the rate of birth defects skyrockets so much, but, as you can tell, i am not totally done wither



Aimee + Scott = Theodore Roosevelt (11/05) and 23 months later Charles Abraham (10/07)....praying for a little sister; the search starts May 2014
Momma Aimee is offline  
#2 of 11 Old 10-22-2013, 10:20 PM
Viola's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 23,481
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

I don't know, really.  My mom had 3 children over the age of 40, and we're all fine, more or less.  She did have 3 miscarriages between her last two children.

Viola is offline  
#3 of 11 Old 10-23-2013, 08:35 AM
Kate&Joey's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 381
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

I'm not sure if "skyrockets" is exactly the right word to use.  It increases...definitely.  But it's still a question of statistics.


The genetic counselor told me that there is approximately a 3% - 5% chance of birth defects in the general population.  Based on my age, DH's age, our family history, and the results of the NT scan, it increased to about a 5% - 7% chance of birth defects.


I conceived when I was 41 and DH was 42.  We have a healthy baby girl who turned six months this week!


To me, the hassle was more being labeled as "high risk" due to my age / frequent ultrasounds / NSTs for a month / being threatened with induction.  But the pregnancy itself was uneventful and the L&D was by far easier than with my first child.  I know that's just my personal experience though.

Mom to DD heartbeat.gif (04.21.13)   DS blahblah.gif (8 years old) and DSD energy.gif(10 years old) and 2 dog2.gif and 2cat.gif
Kate&Joey is online now  
#4 of 11 Old 10-23-2013, 02:52 PM
dreamingtree's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 251
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)

Check out Fertility, Cycles, and Nutrition by Marilyn Shannon. She talks a lot about nutrition reducing the risk in pregnancies over age 35. Worth a look anyway.

dreamingtree is offline  
#5 of 11 Old 10-24-2013, 12:32 PM
mcghee45baby's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 48
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Im 45dh42 we have been trying gour failed fet si far start over 11/1/13 see re and go from there pray that it works this go round
mcghee45baby is offline  
#6 of 11 Old 11-02-2013, 05:50 AM
Good Enough Mum's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

First off, could people please not use the word 'defect' to mean 'disability'? I recognise that no harm was meant, but it's still a very unpleasant, negative way of talking about disability, and pretty inappropriate.


With regards to your dilemma - What things do you think you'd find difficult about having a child with a disability? How would you be placed to meet the challenges, in terms of financial resources, support, available time?


I see from your other posts that you're considering foster-to-adopt. How would you manage if you adopted a child who then turned out to have a disability? What would be the difference?


If you TTC now, would that be instead of the adoption plan or as well as (in which case I assume you'd be postponing the adoption plan)? What is it about the thought of TTC that's drawing you as a possibly preferable option to adopting?

kathteach likes this.
Good Enough Mum is offline  
#7 of 11 Old 11-02-2013, 12:44 PM
carmen358's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The beautiful west coast of Canada!
Posts: 3,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I will be 43 in December and am currently nursing my perfectly healthy 3 month old son on my lap as I type. I had my daughter when I was 39. I had every imaginable test and was told everything was perfect. I get pregnant VERY easily but I had 3 m/c before DD and 5 before known cause. I think how easily I get pregnant isn't likely the norm for over 40 but it is possible....

Me joy.gif, DP treehugger.gif, S bikenew.gif and L babyboy.gif
carmen358 is offline  
#8 of 11 Old 11-02-2013, 08:31 PM
baileyb's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,324
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Im 26 and had my youngest 6 months ago. She has a birth defect, no genetic or otherwise known cause, just happened. My mom had me and my brother at 41 and 43 and neither of us have anything wrong. It think statistics can be scary, especially since something either happens to you or it doesn't, kwim? I think if you dont feel done, to give it a shot. If my mom would have listened to statistics I wouldnt be here.



baileyb is offline  
#9 of 11 Old 11-03-2013, 11:09 PM
mamaBlue's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,460
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Good Enough Mum View Post

First off, could people please not use the word 'defect' to mean 'disability'? I recognise that no harm was meant, but it's still a very unpleasant, negative way of talking about disability, and pretty inappropriate.

I agree that it is always inappropriate to speak of persons with a disability in a derogatory way, but I do not think the OP meant to put anyone down. Should the OP have said that she was afraid that her age puts her at a higher risk of having a child with a 'disability' or instead of using the term 'birth defect'? I honestly do not understand the difference. Maybe you could explain to her and I the appropriate terminology to use so as not to inadvertently offend anyone? I would feel really bad if I did that. I have always understood the term 'birth defect' as an non-offensive general term applied to a part of the body that has anomalies present since birth. For example, my son was born with an undescended testicle. Our doctor referred to this as a birth defect. My husband had cleft palate, and my friend's son had a misshapen sixth toe on one of his feet. Again, these were referred to as birth defects by their respective doctors. These defects did not cause any of these people disabilities, but some birth defects do cause disabilities (spina bifida, for example). Is it incorrect or offensive to say that someone has a birth defect if it caused them to be disabled? I worry at my age about the increased risk of birth defects - both minor and those that cause disabilities. I think this is a normal feeling, as we all want our children to get a healthy start in life.

What if a person has an extra chromosome (t21, t13, t18) or a different chromosome abnormality? Is it inappropriate to refer to the chromosomal anomaly as a birth defect? What is appropriate term to use instead? Disabled? Do we say mentally disabled? That sounds harsh, too.

Please don't think I am being snarky. I would really like to know.

Married to my high school sweetheart. We have four awesome kids.
mamaBlue is online now  
#10 of 11 Old 11-09-2013, 07:51 AM
Good Enough Mum's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)

You're not being snarky at all - excellent questions and well worth asking!


I do want to stress, for starters, that I'm not speaking as any sort of Official Nominated Representative For Disability Rights, or anything. This is my personal opinion on the subject - I do think it's one that a lot of people would share, but I'm not claiming to speak for others besides myself. But 'defect' is a very negative word, and also sounds to me more like a word people would use to report a problem with a piece of furniture. I think many people would object to the implication that they are 'defective' as that does, effectively, mean not good enough the way they are. I would certainly not want my child spoken about that way.


I hadn't actually thought about the fact that some anomalies such as a missing toe aren't actually disabilities. (I think a cleft palate would count as a disability, as it does impair the ability to swallow/eat.) I think 'anomaly' is a better word to use to describe those. Then again, I doubt the OP was referring to things like a missing digit.


It's fair to say that part of the problem is that the post rubbed me up the wrong way generally, but that was the only thing I could specifically pinpoint as being definitely wrong (IMO). I mean, I do get that disability in a child can cause a lot of problems in a family and that risk of disability is a perfectly reasonable thing to take into account when deciding whether or not to have a baby, so I didn't exactly feel I could call the OP on that one. But, at the same time... when someone makes a post in which increased risk of disability is the ONLY issue they raise regarding their decision about whether to have another child, and asks whether it's 'nuts' to consider having a child with an increased disability risk as though that was some sort of blanket decision we could make without knowing anything about her own circumstances and resources... that just sounds more to me like a "Disability? Ugh! Obviously we wouldn't want a disabled child!" attitude.


I don't know if I'm putting this into words very clearly, and I don't want to be unfair to the OP when she might have good reasons to feel she can't care for a disabled child. I just feel the attitude in her post seemed to go beyond "I have weighed up my circumstances and feel there are disabilities it would be very difficult for me to handle taking care of", and into an attitude towards disability that's more problematic.

Good Enough Mum is offline  
#11 of 11 Old 11-09-2013, 08:09 AM
cynthia mosher's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: An Arabian kingdom far far away
Posts: 28,886
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)

Momma Aimee, I suggest you join the Fabulous Forty Moms TTC. I think you'll find plenty of support and encouragement in their thread. :love

cynthia mosher is offline  

Trying To Conceive

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off