Child Spacing - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 35 Old 08-24-2007, 05:04 PM - Thread Starter
 
Ianthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 6,808
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What do you think the best age spacing is for children? I want to TTC #2 with a good difference between the 2. I always thought it was better for them to be closer in age than not, because I am 5 1/2 years older than my next oldest sibling, then 7 and 12 1/2 years. I was never close to any of them until they were teenagers (not yet, even, with my 13 yo little brother).

I was thinking 2 years or less is a good difference. But I would like some input from Mommies who have 2+ kids.

stillheart.gif The Hippie & the Marine stillheart.gif  hh2.gif
My boys: S (4) & O (2) & Expecting #3 in Dec. 2011

Ianthe is offline  
#2 of 35 Old 08-24-2007, 06:44 PM
 
AugustineM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Whidbey Island, WA
Posts: 3,161
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine are 21 months apart and to be honest it has been pretty hard since my second was born and she's 15 months old now. I keep waiting for it to get easier, and in some ways it has (not tandem nursing anymore) but it's still really tough a lot of days.

While DS wasn't really aware of DD when she was born, he started getting jealous when she was about 8 mo. old. He started acting out against her and let me tell you, I was not a good parent there for a while. It's hard to maintain patience and kindness when you have two needing you, then one starts hitting the other one... craziness!!

Anyway, I have heard that they will play well together when they get older, and I'm sure they will, but I can still see a lot of possible rivalry and bickering in our future. My bro and I are 2 years apart and we fought a lot growing up and are not close at all now. I do hope that my two will fare better than that, but who knows.

We will have a third but I think I'll shoot for 3 years apart. I can see how that would be easier.

Mama to 3 kids. We live in a yurt!
AugustineM is offline  
#3 of 35 Old 08-24-2007, 07:01 PM
 
socialworkmamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 188
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just wanted to share my experience. My two are four years apart and it's been wonderful. They are now 6 and 2 and it is so much fun to see their relationship grow each day. My daughter was very high needs and sensitive (still is) and I really think having a sibling any closer would have been horrible for us all. By 4, Carrie was weaned and was really excited about having a baby. She could understand what was happening and was just so sweet about it. We've had very little sibling jealousy, and Carrie has always been able to verbalize her feelings so we could discuss it.
I think siblings are close or distant for a variety of reasons, and age really has very little to do with it, especially among adults.
Good luck with whatever your TTC journey brings.
Pamela
socialworkmamma is offline  
#4 of 35 Old 08-24-2007, 07:51 PM
 
Swandira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 908
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I've read that from a health point of view for both the children and the mother (according to WHO and some other organization that did a massive study), 3-5 years apart is the ideal spacing. Also, my sister and I are three years apart, and are best friends to this day. Accordingly, I left my IUD in until my firstborn was a little over two. We have kids who are a little over three years apart, and it's worked really well for us. One of the great things about it is that I had over two years to focus on just learning to be a parent and getting to know my oldest. On the other hand, my kids are close enough developmentally that they play together really well.

Another fringe benefit is that I didn't have an awful lot of time handling two kids in diapers at once. My older one potty-trained himself shortly after his sister was born. If I had had them closer together (as I was tempted to do, but I made myself wait), I would have had a lot more diaper action all at once.

I won't say adjusting to having two was easy for us. It was tough. However, unlike the previous poster who said it's taking a long time to get easier, I've gotta say it's been comparatively easy since my little one learned to walk! (Sorry to those who are still having a rough time )

Good luck deciding!

Nealy
Tandem-nursing VBAC mama to Thales, 4 1/2, and Lydia, 1 1/2
Swandira is offline  
#5 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 02:12 PM
 
coco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hi! I'm obsessed with child spacing too- here's my 2cents- Mine are exactly 2 years apart boy then girl. It is a little close for my ability/patience level. We have talked about 3 being a good number for us and as Im 36 now, we wanted to get them all in pretty soon (I know not everyone feels this pressure, but I did and do) anyway he ignored her at first which was fine, he was still sweet, but it wasnt a big deal. now that shes walking it is so sweet to see them together, they are very attached to each other, I love it. But they are a handful, and I definitely have been stretched beyond my ability to be the mother I would like to be. The second did sort of end the love affair I was having with my first, and Im not sure if his behavior would have started to change because he had just turned 2, or if the splitting of my attention caused it. or both. And she has definitely not received a fraction of the attention he did for his first year and a half, So I feel guilty about that too. On the other hand, July just passed and with it my chance to have another exactly 2 year spacing and I was very anxious about it. when I see the 2 of them sitting side by side on the steps eating their popcicles so bonded and sweet, I think it is great spacing and I worry if theres another one too much later he/she will be too young to be it this sweet little group. SO....drumroll, I vote for 2 1/2 years. Every month makes a difference at this point, and I think for me 3 might be a little too far apart. For what its worth.
coco is offline  
#6 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 02:25 PM
 
alegna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 44,408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would not be comfortable ttc when the baby is under two. I personally feel that it's a child's birth right to have full access to breastmilk for two full years. I could not risk that.

-Angela
alegna is offline  
#7 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 04:08 PM - Thread Starter
 
Ianthe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 6,808
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna View Post
I would not be comfortable ttc when the baby is under two. I personally feel that it's a child's birth right to have full access to breastmilk for two full years. I could not risk that.

-Angela
Yes, that is a major factor in the decision making as well. DS is on;ly 3 months now, I def don't feel like I should get pregnant again right away, physically. I was just wondering when would be a good time to start trying (or not preventing) again.

stillheart.gif The Hippie & the Marine stillheart.gif  hh2.gif
My boys: S (4) & O (2) & Expecting #3 in Dec. 2011

Ianthe is offline  
#8 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 04:47 PM
 
lilsishomemade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Dorothy
Posts: 1,566
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My oldest and middle children are 15 months apart. I really wish I'd had more time between them. If I had spaced them more, I could have had more time with my oldest, and then when #2 came along, I wouldn't have had another baby to take care of. I feel guilty sometimes that I couldn't give them the kind of attention I really feel they deserved.

Now, my baby is almost exactly 2 years younger than #2 and that is so much nicer. I get to enjoy the baby, and the older two are old enough to understand what it's all about. Don't get me wrong, E and J are extremely close. They share everything. But, they fight a lot, too. Oh, and together they think of new and improved ways to get into things. I swear, they put their heads together and there is nothing that is going to stop them from doing what they want to do. I think people with twins probably understands exactly what I'm talking about.
lilsishomemade is offline  
#9 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 05:18 PM
 
wednesday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think 3 years minimum is ideal, for the reasons of nursing and for mom's nutrition status. We were planning on 3 years initially, but our situation just didn't favor TTC on that timeline, so we put it off, and man did that ever work out for the best. We went through some VERY challenging behavior and food issues and major night-time disturbances from about 3 to 3-1/2. I just don't know how we would have coped if we'd also had a newborn, DH and I both were just losing our minds. We just hung in there and were very very grateful that we were able to completely focus on figuring out what was troubling DS.

We're TTC now, if it happens soon the spacing would be about 4.75 years. Longer than I would have thought ideal, but it is what it is.

I guess now I think "ideal" is whatever works out best for your own family in juggling your priorities with finances/income/schooling/health etc.

FWIW my niece and nephew are 18 months apart and fought BRUTALLY with each other for several years as toddlers/preschoolers, it was horrible. I mean they honestly could barely be taken out in public because of the scenes they caused. They're not as aggressive anymore (ages 7 & 5 now) but still don't play together or really interact with each other much from what I can tell. So you really can't assume close spacing will mean good playmates.
wednesday is offline  
#10 of 35 Old 08-26-2007, 06:30 PM
 
mwright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle,wa
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I did get pregnant when dd was only 8mo unexpectedly. I ended up miscarrying. I am greatful for how things have turned out because my dd is now 14mo and our breastfeeding relationship is still going strong and I think being pregnant would have compromised that. Even though I longed for that baby, I know that there is another babe for us when the timing is right and right now I am thinking 3yr spacing would be great! That gives me at least another year to focus on my precious dd and continue to bf. Oh, and it gives DH some more time to adjust and get used to the idea of another babe in the house

Melissa loving my DH and DD(4yr)hearts.gif Most likely in my garden. Two angel.gif that I'll remember forever. My baby is here!!! Ethan Matthew came at 42 weeks on 5/19/10 9.10 lbs hbac.gif
mwright is offline  
#11 of 35 Old 08-27-2007, 03:21 PM
 
Emmalina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada - at last!
Posts: 355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna View Post
I would not be comfortable ttc when the baby is under two. I personally feel that it's a child's birth right to have full access to breastmilk for two full years. I could not risk that.

-Angela
I agree. I know some people can successfully nurse through pregnancy but I do think nature is telling us something. A couple of recent studies indicate that waiting less than 18-24 months can be a risk both the the mother and the new baby, there are often problems with birth weight and prematurity. As the mum of a 29wk preemie (who is now 2 yrs) I would take any kind of warning seriously. It isn't something you want to go through.

If it helps my sister and I are 4 yrs apart and really close. I don't know that there is an ideal but giving your child room to develop and grow over the first 2/3 yrs is, IMHO really crucial.

Good luck!
Emmalina is offline  
#12 of 35 Old 08-27-2007, 03:45 PM
 
momtolivy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 62
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My girls are 14.5 months apart, and I'm pregnant with #3 who will be 21 months younger than my youngest - and due just before DD#1 turns three. My daughters play very well together (so far!), and although it's very challenging in terms of meeting their needs (while also feeling run down from the pregnancy and working), I wouldn't change it at all.
momtolivy is offline  
#13 of 35 Old 08-27-2007, 07:52 PM
 
Unoppressed MAMA Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Exactly Where I'm At
Posts: 1,942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
i wish my children were about seven years apart. then i think my oldest would be into it, instead of seeing him as some irritating PITA.

they're 11 months apart and she doesn't like him at all. i always thought she would just sort of take him for granted, but it is SO very not the case.

and having them that close is bad for 8000 other reasons as well. my life is a good example of what NOT to do, in regards to child-spacing.
Unoppressed MAMA Q is offline  
#14 of 35 Old 08-27-2007, 08:04 PM
 
ledzepplon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 5,775
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine are 22 months apart. I love it! Sure, it's hard at times, but now they are at the point where they play together and are very close. My dd is very protective of her little brother, and he loves trying to imitate her. They like playing with a lot of the same toys, going to the same parks, reading the same stories (although my ds skips out on some of the longer ones dd likes).

I wouldn't opt to space mine any closer, but I've really liked our situation. I should add that my dd is a pretty easygoing and independent kid, and has been since she was much younger. This did factor into our decision to try for ds so soon.

Wife to a wonderful dh and mom to four beautiful kiddos, dd (3/04):, ds1 (1/06), ds2 (10/08), and ds3 (7/10)
ledzepplon is offline  
#15 of 35 Old 08-28-2007, 03:10 AM
 
DiannaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,850
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I realize my situation is unique ... but my girls are spaced 11 years apart! I had DD#1 with my XH, and didn't think I would have any more. Lo and behold, while dating my (now) DH, I woke up one day, and said, "OH! I'm pregnant!":
Rachel is 16 months old, and we're discussing TTC.What this means, is that I'm not doing anything to prevent a pregnancy, and I'm loosely following my temps/mucus, etc. I was actually disappointed when AF came Sunday. I'm 34, and DH is 41, so we don't have a lot of time to waste, in my opinion.

Catholic homeschooling mom of 5 - a teenager, a kindergartener, twin boys and a tiny princess. Follow the Adventures! 

DiannaK is offline  
#16 of 35 Old 08-28-2007, 02:33 PM
 
momof_3_boys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first two are 14 months apart, and the baby came along 25 months later.

It's difficult at times, but I think it's worth it.
momof_3_boys is offline  
#17 of 35 Old 08-30-2007, 04:50 PM
 
lizziejackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West Des Moines Iowa
Posts: 171
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both of my gaps are 2 yr 8 mo. Sometimes, I wish they were farther apart, rarely wished they were closer together, but most often I think it's perfect. There are certainly a lot of factors that go into making the decision -- ours was mostly patience. I also did not want two in diapers at the same time and did not want them too close in school. Our gap might have been a little more if we had started younger and wanted fewer children. I think each family has it's own situation.
lizziejackie is offline  
#18 of 35 Old 09-02-2007, 01:01 AM
 
3kidsclmr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine are all 2 years apart. I was very sad that DS #2 weaned at 18 months when my milk ran out due to pregnancy. DS #1 was happy to nurse all through my pregnancy, and picked up right where he left off when the milk came back, but I feel I cheated DS #2 because he refused to nurse after I had DD. Now I have to sneak pumped milk into his drinks...

mom to DS 7, DS 5 and DD 3 :
3kidsclmr is offline  
#19 of 35 Old 09-02-2007, 07:59 PM
 
Peony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 25,342
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I'm also of the 2 years of BM before getting pg mindset. My DD's are 3y and 10m apart and I wouldn't change a thing. After DD2 reaches 2y of age, it's fine if I get pg, although I would prefer a farther spacing. My sister and I are exactly 2y apart and we have never been close so I never have bought into "certain spacing=closer siblings", it's just depends on each child and their personalities.

DD2 is 10m, and I am starting to feel antsy, I think because I feel there is a child waiting on me. This is a new feeling to me, I didn't feel like this last time until we were very actively TTC DD2. Sigh, that child just needs to learn some patience, because it's going to be a few more years.

There is no way to happiness, happiness is the way.
Peony is offline  
#20 of 35 Old 09-03-2007, 10:02 AM
 
Lexi_029's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 919
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
We're hoping for 2ish years apart. My brother and I were about 2.5 years apart in age and were extremely close. DH is 4 years apart from his middle brother, 8 from the oldest. Not a big fan of that spacing.
Lexi_029 is offline  
#21 of 35 Old 09-03-2007, 10:12 AM
 
That Is Nice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,036
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swandira View Post
I've read that from a health point of view for both the children and the mother (according to WHO and some other organization that did a massive study), 3-5 years apart is the ideal spacing
I've read 3-5 years is ideal, as well. That amount of time allows your body to recover. I feel wiped out from my pregnancy and the thought of another pregnancy fills me with worry, stress, and despair, at this point.
That Is Nice is offline  
#22 of 35 Old 09-03-2007, 03:29 PM
 
Synchro246's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Having a baby and a toddler is rediculously hard. I fully believe that human babies are *supposed* to be 4ish years apart. Maybe closer would be more realistic if we lived in a culture where extended families lived together.

I'm far apart from my siblings. I'm OK with that.

My babies are 27 months apart and I am not OK with all the parenting compromises I've had to make in the last three months. Both the baby and the toddler get less than I think baby humans deserve.

that's my honest two pennies.

~laura
and planning to eat it again
Synchro246 is offline  
#23 of 35 Old 09-05-2007, 02:21 AM
 
Prairiemother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 303
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You're getting lots of feedback! Hope you find it helpful!

We have 2 that are 2 years apart. Now ds is 16 months and we are thinking about a third but I don't want to lose my milk, and ds still needs his "mimi" so much. On the other hand, they play together really well and I think it is due to the close spacing - simple things please them both, like screeching at the top of their lungs while running up and down the hall, playing with pots and pans, and unloading the cupboards. All the things that make me grit my teeth and remind myself better they are happy than not! I would not want a third to be much younger than the older two, for fear they would feel left out.

Anyway, I like having two so much more than having one, even though I do feel that there is a compromise for the oldest in losing some parenting time.

I did not feel BTW that my body was compromised by the second pregnancy so close to the first. In fact I felt much better than with the first, possibly because I gave up a vegetarian diet. We do eat so much better than many of the people for whom the WHO would have made their child-spacing recommendations (this is my speculation, anyway - just a thought).

busy mama of three
Prairiemother is offline  
#24 of 35 Old 09-08-2007, 12:26 PM
 
StormySar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Melvindale, MI
Posts: 1,277
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have 3 kids under 3.5 years old. My oldest two are 19 mos. apart and the baby came alonga bout 21 months later. I miscarried between my baby and my son, which would have put the kids at about 15 months apart.

Personally, I have wanted children close together. My older two were showing signs of weaning before I became pregnant, so nursing until two was not going to be an option.

My daughter and son (the older two) are good playmates and they both adore the baby. my son is a little hard to cope with right now because he's such "rough and tumble" and shows his love thorugh headbutts and trying to lay on the baby to hug her. he is showing his love in his own way, but it is difficult because the baby has to be on me in a sling constantly for me to be able to get anything done. I fear that constantly wearing the baby will lead to jealousy angers but so far that does not sppear to be happening.

I think the more kids you have, the more you naturally adapt. I would never have imagined being able ot handle and cope with 3 kids under 3.5 before I had kids or even with my first.
StormySar is offline  
#25 of 35 Old 09-09-2007, 10:19 AM
 
marisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm due with my fourth child in a couple of months. I will have four kids five and under.

I love having closely spaced (all 2 years apart) children. We are dedicated homeschoolers, and this will make it easier for me having them at closer developmental stages. It's very hard work, but it's just for a season. I love how close my children are, my boys are the best of friends. I tandem nursed all of them, and all of them got their 2 full years of breastmilk (and more!). This is what works best for our family dynamic, this kind of question has no one size fits all answer. For us, we both are at home full time (home business) and DH helps out alot. This is our last child, and I am relieved to get all the diapers and toddler years done at once.
marisa is offline  
#26 of 35 Old 09-12-2007, 12:28 AM
 
haleyelianasmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,466
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by alegna View Post
I would not be comfortable ttc when the baby is under two. I personally feel that it's a child's birth right to have full access to breastmilk for two full years. I could not risk that.

-Angela

I'd have to add... wait and see how your body reacts, too. I went back and forth trying to think of what would be a good age difference, but at this point, it is out of my hands. I still don't feel totally ready for another and dd is 2. It also depends on the kid. DD spent a lot of time today just nursing and being held (I think she's having a tough transition since dh is back at work after a vacation) and there is no way I could have devoted that much energy to helping her if I had a baby, too. Some kids are more independent, but in our situation, less than 2 years wouldn't work.
haleyelianasmom is offline  
#27 of 35 Old 09-12-2007, 06:58 PM
 
jenniepaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 523
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My two are 2.5 years apart. The first year I thought I was going to loose my mind. (although I also had PPD) It has gotten much easier now that they can play together. Although they do fight a lot over toys and the older one regressed a lot when DD2 was born and still tries to do baby things because she sees that we get a rise out of it. But DD1 adores DD2 and it is really cute when they do play.
Right now I am in the same boat about wondering when to have #2. I think 2.5 years was to hard and would rather do sooner or later.
Im not sure so these replies are good, but I am seeing that it is different for everybody and there's no clear answer as to what to do. You just have to find your own path cause it is what it is no mater what it is. lol

Jennie: SAHM to 3, student, and wife of almost 9 years.
Emily 7.5 Taylor 5 Logan 7.9.08 signcirc1.gif
mdcblog5.gif It's a collection of recipe's and tips on how and why to make real food plus some other good stuff!
http://purehomemaking.com/
jenniepaige is offline  
#28 of 35 Old 09-12-2007, 07:01 PM
 
Marlet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Closer to home..
Posts: 9,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine are 27 months apart and so far so good.

I have heard once you get to a spacing of 5 years or more your body treats it more like a first pregnancy.

Give more**Expect Less
There is no such thing as bad weather. Only bad clothing.
Marlet is offline  
#29 of 35 Old 09-12-2007, 11:12 PM
 
Valian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upstairs where its warm.
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As an abstract 'rule of thumb' I wouldn't want a gap of less than 30mo/2.5 years. I could not meet my own parenting standards for two children any closer in age. Taking into accound my Ds1 specifically, I think 3+ sounds optimal for him and I.
Valian is offline  
#30 of 35 Old 09-13-2007, 12:20 AM
 
PookieMom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
my two are 21 months apart and i absolutely LOVE it. My second was a surprise and i hit rock bottom. Her birth was traumatic and we were even considering not having any more at all! I cried a lot and felt like this would make my daughter grow up too fast and I was extremely worried that things would be horrible and they would hate each other and I read "Siblings without rivalry" (i'm sorry, i don't remember the author, i let a friend borrow it) and it completely calmed me down. No matter what age difference you decide is best for you, because everyone is different, i highly recommend this book. actually, we're planning on ttc our third pretty soon. But my pregnancy with my son was wonderful and i feel my body is completely healed and ready to do it again.
Whatever you decide, do what's best for you and your family, things have a way of working themselves out.

In love with the Hubs (6-03) & : Kookie Pookie Girl (c/s 5-05) & Bouncy Big Boy (vbac 2-07) & : Miss Cheeky Cheeks (hbac 11-08) 100*90* 100lbs = Las Vegas : Almost there!
PookieMom is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off