Glucose Test - New Standards since Jan.? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 10 Old 10-10-2011, 09:44 PM - Thread Starter
 
Carrissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Went to the midwife today and the glucose test was brought up - I'm 13 weeks. She said that I would have to have the glucose test done TWICE this pregnancy - once I think at 20 weeks and another at 35 weeks? Can't remember the exact weeks. She said they changed the standard in Jan. and it's no longer just a 1 hour first either. She said that you fast, they take your blood, you drink the stuff, then blood test at 1 hour and then another at 2 hours for both tests. She said this would apply to me because of my BMI and then she looked at me like she was sorry. This is the first time I have met her (second time being at this office). I want to know if anyone else has heard of this as this is the first time I have and I got more than a little upset as she has no idea what my BMI is.  I'm a little overweight, but I'm wondering what the heck your BMI has to be to be treated like this. It sounds ridiculous to me. Thanks!

Carrissa is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 12:33 AM
 
lifeguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Coyote Rock Farm
Posts: 6,541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

bmi is used because being heavier is a risk factor (among others) for gestational diabetes. Having had 2 gd pregnancies & read everything I see on the subject I can tell you it comes down to this: there is no one standard of care, each care provider/organization uses it's own standard when approaching it. If you really don't like it I would consider looking for a different midwife.


Surviving sleep deprivation one day at a time with dd (Oct '11) & ds (Oct '08).

lifeguard is offline  
#3 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 06:46 AM - Thread Starter
 
Carrissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I also have had two gd pregnancies, but she didn't know that as she is a new midwife for me. I want to see whatever she is talking about in Jan. that changed how to do this so there is no more 1 hour test. I found the IADPSG panel that suggested new guidelines, but nowhere in there did it say anything about doing this twice for people with high BMI. Does anyone have this information?

Carrissa is offline  
#4 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 08:09 AM
 
WaitingForKiddos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern Ca
Posts: 2,393
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

What if you just say 'no thanks' ?


Cindy, joyful SAH mama to rainbow1284.gif William & Katherinefly-by-nursing2.gif Forever missing Amelia 7-12-09 angel3.gif  signcirc1.gifsaynovax.giflactivist.gif Ask me about my natural cesarean! 

 

 

WaitingForKiddos is offline  
#5 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 08:17 AM - Thread Starter
 
Carrissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes, definitely will do that, but would like to see the new guidelines she is talking about. 

Carrissa is offline  
#6 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 08:34 AM
 
parsley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: in between
Posts: 773
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

At my first appt with my midwife practice I was told that they have started offering a GD test at 10-14 weeks to all women who have a BMI over x?  (I forget the actual number).  I declined, explaining that I know I'm not a diabetic and didn't have GD with my first pregnancy.  The midwife was totally fine with my response and nothing else was ever said. 

 

I will agree to do the 1 hour test in a few weeks time (I'm 21 weeks now). 

 

With my first, it was a different practice and different state and city, but no one suggested doing an early GD test. 


Partner to DH and mom to DD1 (3/2008) and DD2 (born 1/2012).
parsley is offline  
#7 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 08:55 AM
 
emmaegbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,881
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

bmi is just weight and height so if that was in your chart, she can easily see what it is.

 

I had a previous GD pregnancy and was able to skip the test, just went straight to monitoring. we all agreed it was more important to know what my actual blood sugar is doing, not what happens when I fast and then drink a glucose syrup, which is something that literally I would never do in real life. Its important to me for my own health and that of my baby to have stable, normal blood sugar so I am very happy to have the opportunity to take control over this from the get go and I decided to just be proactive this time and chose my health care practitioners b/c they we were on the same page about it all. I had been able to achieve satisfactory control through just diet in my previous pregnancy, so we assumed that I would be again (I have been).

 

I agree with Lifeguard, seems like different practices have really different protocols. If they work through a particular hospital or OB practice, the MWs may not have much leeway.

 

FWIW, I think that all women are recommended to be screened, regardless of BMI. Thin people can develop GD (and type II) and it can be missed b/c there are so many assumptions around the link between being overweight and diabetes.


dissertating mom to three

emmaegbert is offline  
#8 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 09:08 AM
 
Thesan83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

The practice I go to no longer does the 1 hour screen and opts for giving everyone a 75g, 2 hour test instead. (This also replaces the 3 hour test: fail the initial 2 hour and you get referred to a GD clinic rather than go back in for an even longer test.)

 

I thought it was odd when they first told me about it, since I'd never heard of anyone doing something other than a 1 hour screen followed by a 3 hour diagnostic test. I did find some information suggesting that shifting to a 2 hour test is becoming more common in the United States and that it is standard in Europe and Canada. I didn't find anything that suggests it should be done more than once based on BMI alone, although it makes sense to screen early based on that since being overweight is a risk factor.

 

20 weeks doesn't strike me as super early to do the test. But I would be concerned about missing GD that might develop around 24-26 weeks and not detecting it until 35 when there's not much left that you can do about it. In any case, if your MW was aware of your previous GD in pregnancy, she'd probably want to screen you even earlier so that they could catch it as early as possible.

Thesan83 is offline  
#9 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 10:32 AM
 
lifeguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Coyote Rock Farm
Posts: 6,541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

fwiw - with previous gd pregnancies I would go into this assuming it will be again & get on track with diet & tracking from the get go regardless of testing policies or timing.


Surviving sleep deprivation one day at a time with dd (Oct '11) & ds (Oct '08).

lifeguard is offline  
#10 of 10 Old 10-11-2011, 11:51 PM
 
Sweet.Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heidiland
Posts: 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thesan83 View Post

I did find some information suggesting that shifting to a 2 hour test is becoming more common in the United States and that it is standard in Europe and Canada.


I can confirm that the longer test seems pretty standard in Europe right now. I'm going straight to the fasting test (next week's appointment at 27 weeks). I am thin and did not have GD during my last pregnancy. Also no sugar in my urine yet, though I did have it often enough last pregnancy that I had to repeat the test after passing the 1st. This was ~2 years ago (in a different European country), and I also jumped right to the longer test then.


Mama to our little boy (3) babyf.gif , the amazing super squirmer, almost born in the taxi...

and our new baby girl stork-girl.gif, caught by her daddy in our bathtub!

Sweet.Bee is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off