Did each labor get faster for you? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 79 Old 10-12-2011, 04:32 PM - Thread Starter
 
Celticqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'm curious about what my chances are that this birth will be just as quick or quicker than my last 2. 

 

First child: 7 hour labor

Second child: 1 hour labor

 

Both started with the water breaking on its own, then contractions started 24 hours later, so I am only counting "labor" to be from the time pain started until the baby was out. 

 

The second baby was especially startling considering how quick it was. The water birth center was 20 minutes away, and it seems like I barely made it there after ctx kicked in...

 

What is your experience?

 

My midwife is convinced that I'm going to have another super quick one. I can't complain! But I wonder how likely it is...

 

It'd be nice to look at the statistics of multiple labors per woman but I can't find that info for some reason. The only way to really know will be to just see for myself what happens, but I can't help but be curious!


Me whistling.gif Wife / SAHM / Musician/ Actress/ Queen of this castle. Progeny: William (January 2007), Tristan (November 2008) and expecting Lukas stork-boy.gif due January 2012!!  lactivist.gif femalesling.GIFwaterbirth.jpg dishes.gif

Celticqueen is offline  
#2 of 79 Old 10-12-2011, 06:41 PM
 
Magali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Molten Core
Posts: 2,333
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Both of my labors were long.  The first one was augmented with pitocin and was about 16 hours.  My second was about 24 hours, no pitocin.  So, it hasn't been my experience.  I am always in awe of women who have short labors.  It blows my mind.


 caffix.gif

Magali is offline  
#3 of 79 Old 10-12-2011, 06:53 PM
 
AfricanQueen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I have yet to have a Braxton-Hicks so I count labor from my first contraction to babe on my chest.  Both kids pretty much flew out the second my water broke (OB punctured with my first, baby punctured with my second).

 

1st - 12 hours

2nd - 3 hours

 

I seriously wonder if this next kid is just going to fly out at first contraction (I'm hoping!) - although I have logistical concerns about dealing with the current two if I have another quick labor and my old man happens to be at work.


Angela
Chatty Girl - 3/2006, Lovey Boy - 1/2010, Delicious Baby Girl - 1/2012
AfricanQueen99 is offline  
#4 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 03:37 AM
 
Sweet.Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heidiland
Posts: 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'm curious about this, too. My first labor was just over 2 hours, so officially a "precipitous labor". According to this site, a previous precipitous labor is a risk factor for having another.

 

I wonder if people have found this to be true, though.


Mama to our little boy (3) babyf.gif , the amazing super squirmer, almost born in the taxi...

and our new baby girl stork-girl.gif, caught by her daddy in our bathtub!

Sweet.Bee is offline  
#5 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 05:57 AM
 
Just1More's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yep.

 

My first was 12 hours (but I was on my back at the hospital, and she was posterior.  I wasn't allowed to eat or move around at all.  So, still pretty fast considering....).

 

I do have bh, and it's hard to tell the real thing from early labor.  No change happens at all...I always start labor completely at zero, very little effaced. 

 

So, from the first "painful contraction" to birth:

 

My second was 30 minutes.  I had about 2 hours before that that I thought were early, early labor.  I could completely ignore them, talk through them, etc.  Nothing to tell me something was about to happen (other than that I checked and found myself at 5 cm!)

 

My third, I woke up at 2, and was sure it was labor at 5:30.  She was born at 8.  So 2.5 hours.  Again, if I hadn't checked, I would have thought they were just more bh and I should drink more water.  Only the last hour was anything to remotely pay attention to. 

 

My fourth I had a stalled labor.  I went from zero to four in four contractions and 30 minutes....and then it stopped until the kids went to bed that night.  I was a little uncomfortable around 6, and started noticing contractions more around 7.  Nothing I had to pay attention to until 9 or so, and she was born at 9:45.

 

Since the beginning of my labors are so blurry to me, I'd say mine are about 2 to 3 hours.  My midwife said that firsts are slow, seconds are fast, and the third is unpredictable.  She said that after that your labor pattern is mostly set.  I hope so. :)  I'm working on baby 5 now. 


"If you keep doing the same things you've always done, you'll keep getting the same results you've always gotten."

Just1More is offline  
#6 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 06:09 AM
 
UnassistedMomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CNY
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Mine have each gotten longer.  I'm really, really hoping for something much faster than the 42 & 41 hour labors I had with my last two babes!


dizzy.gif DS1: 10/89 - DD1: 06/94 - DD2: 02/97 - DS2: 12/05 - DS3: 12/08 - DC6: ETA 04/26/12

I'll be 42 when the newest little one is born! Yowza!

 

 

UnassistedMomma is offline  
#7 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 06:33 AM
 
AfricanQueen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet.Bee View Post

I'm curious about this, too. My first labor was just over 2 hours, so officially a "precipitous labor". According to this site, a previous precipitous labor is a risk factor for having another.

 

I wonder if people have found this to be true, though.

Thanks for the link. That was my second labor - contractions on top of each other that I couldn't wrap my mind around. I also had a severe tear (my labia was literally hanging on by a thread). Interestingly enough, that kid was 8.12 at birth so not small by any means, there was no IV/pitocin and I've never touched cocaine in my life.

I do hope #3 is quick, but I'd like to be more emotionally present for that birth.

Angela
Chatty Girl - 3/2006, Lovey Boy - 1/2010, Delicious Baby Girl - 1/2012
AfricanQueen99 is offline  
#8 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 06:50 AM
 
vivica2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Utah Desert
Posts: 1,033
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)

my first was 23 hours,

my second was 6 hours. 


DS-8/06 peace.gif
DD-5/08 innocent.gif
DD-4/12 loveeyes.gif
Due: July2014 shy.gif
semi crunchy, but getting crispier!

 

*** heartbeat.gif 5****10****15****20****25****30****35****40
vivica2 is offline  
#9 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 09:01 AM
 
Snowflake777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

1st was 24 hours.

 

2nd was around 2.5 hours (not including weeks of prodromal contractions).

 

I'm a little worried that next time could be even faster. cold.gif


Mama to a preschooler and a baby.

Snowflake777 is offline  
#10 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 11:29 AM
 
Snugglebugmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 816
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

First was 44 hours, second 18 hours, third 9 hours. I figure by the 6th kid, I should be at the point where I think:"Hey, is my labor starting?" after which I will proceed to push out my baby. orngtongue.gif


~Iris~ Catholic mama to DD1 11/15/05 * DD2 04/28/08 * brokenheart.gif06/23/2010 * and our little rainbow DS 10/07/11 love.gif
 

Snugglebugmom is offline  
#11 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 11:52 AM
 
Mizelenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Lalaland
Posts: 7,046
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hmm . . .I always have a hard time counting actual labor, but overall, I'd say they were more or less the same, maybe a little faster each time.

 

The last time was the best.  Easy but regular cx at 6:30, water broke (never happened to me before) at 7:30, and born by 8:30.  I never felt transition, either.  Just so tired of being pregnant that I decided I'd just GET HER OUT. 

 

Hospital people were surprised when I walked in and could talk w/o issue, and was 8 cm, then baby was born 20 minutes later.  I hope I am as lucky this time.


 2/02, 4/05, 2/07, 11/09, and EDD 12/25/11 wave.gif

 

 

Mizelenius is offline  
#12 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 03:41 PM - Thread Starter
 
Celticqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Interesting responses!! I'm so hoping for another fast one. Although it's hard to imagine faster than an hour lol.gif That hour went by SOOOO quickly. Before I knew it, the baby was in my arms and I asked myself "How the eff did that just happen?" 

 

The weird thing is though that I don't understand...I've always heard that it's hereditery. That if you have quick labors, most likely your mother did, etc. Was that true for you? My mom had LONG labors with all 5 of us...ranging anywhere from 20, 30, 40 hour labors. So for me, it's not true at all


Me whistling.gif Wife / SAHM / Musician/ Actress/ Queen of this castle. Progeny: William (January 2007), Tristan (November 2008) and expecting Lukas stork-boy.gif due January 2012!!  lactivist.gif femalesling.GIFwaterbirth.jpg dishes.gif

Celticqueen is offline  
#13 of 79 Old 10-13-2011, 07:52 PM
 
Just1More's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Yes, my mom and sister both had quick labors.  My grandma and two aunts, however, did not.  My midwife said that you are more likely to labor like your sister than like your mom.


"If you keep doing the same things you've always done, you'll keep getting the same results you've always gotten."

Just1More is offline  
#14 of 79 Old 10-14-2011, 08:51 AM
 
Sweet.Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Heidiland
Posts: 930
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizelenius View Post

I never felt transition, either.


This is probably going to sound stupid, but what is this "transition" people keep talking about? It's supposed to hurt more? My labor started out with really strong contractions and stayed about the same throughout. At some point, my body started pushing, but the pain was the same as before.

 

In any case, I'm hoping for another short labor b/c I am a wimp when it comes to pain.

 

P.S. wave.gif vivica! How are you feeling?


Mama to our little boy (3) babyf.gif , the amazing super squirmer, almost born in the taxi...

and our new baby girl stork-girl.gif, caught by her daddy in our bathtub!

Sweet.Bee is offline  
#15 of 79 Old 10-14-2011, 10:20 AM
 
samstress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: so-cal
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

i honestly think that there's no rhyme or reason when it comes to such things.  while my second was indeed quicker than my first (just under five hours compared to 28 hours), i had naively thought #2 would come sooner.  my first came on her due date, so i was sure my second would come on his due date (if not sooner).  nope, he was two weeks late.

 

i really believe every pregnancy, every labor, every birth and every baby are truly unique and as soon as you think you're going to have a certain kind of experience, you end up with something very different. 

 

just my nickel minus three.  :)


mother is a verb
I GOT MY vbac.gif!!!

samstress is offline  
#16 of 79 Old 10-14-2011, 11:07 AM
 
Mizelenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Lalaland
Posts: 7,046
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


With the first three, it was a period where the intensity increased by a lot.  With each of them, it only lasted minutes but felt much longer.  Then, it was time to push. The first time pushing I felt amazing (so much better than I had during transition), the next time (2nd baby) pushing was still intense but very quick . . .the third time the baby just about fell out (almost did not make it from the shower to the bed :), and the last time, it was all on my terms since, like I said, I was done being PG and just wanted her out, so no transition, etc.

 

I am guessing you will have another short labor!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet.Bee View Post

Quote:

This is probably going to sound stupid, but what is this "transition" people keep talking about? It's supposed to hurt more? My labor started out with really strong contractions and stayed about the same throughout. At some point, my body started pushing, but the pain was the same as before.

 

In any case, I'm hoping for another short labor b/c I am a wimp when it comes to pain.

 

P.S. wave.gif vivica! How are you feeling?



 


 2/02, 4/05, 2/07, 11/09, and EDD 12/25/11 wave.gif

 

 

Mizelenius is offline  
#17 of 79 Old 10-14-2011, 11:10 AM
 
Mizelenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In Lalaland
Posts: 7,046
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


My mom and I have fast labors.  My mom (this was back in the 70s) wanted an all natural birth, but once, just as she was about to push, they gave her a spinal w/o her consent.  She was mad!

 

My sister's labors are longer . . .they may be more intense, too.  She always gets an epidural.  Seems like she is in so much pain the baby does not descend fully until she's relaxed, and then it's fine.  So far, I have never wanted or needed an epi.  My labors are fast and manageable.

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celticqueen View Post

Interesting responses!! I'm so hoping for another fast one. Although it's hard to imagine faster than an hour lol.gif That hour went by SOOOO quickly. Before I knew it, the baby was in my arms and I asked myself "How the eff did that just happen?" 

 

The weird thing is though that I don't understand...I've always heard that it's hereditery. That if you have quick labors, most likely your mother did, etc. Was that true for you? My mom had LONG labors with all 5 of us...ranging anywhere from 20, 30, 40 hour labors. So for me, it's not true at all



 


 2/02, 4/05, 2/07, 11/09, and EDD 12/25/11 wave.gif

 

 

Mizelenius is offline  
#18 of 79 Old 10-14-2011, 02:42 PM - Thread Starter
 
Celticqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet.Bee View Post

Quote:

This is probably going to sound stupid, but what is this "transition" people keep talking about? It's supposed to hurt more? My labor started out with really strong contractions and stayed about the same throughout. At some point, my body started pushing, but the pain was the same as before.



Yeah I'm with you too...For both labors (first was pitocin, second was natural ctx) felt the same in "severity" from the moment I had them. The only difference is that they became more frequent. Maybe that's what people are referring to in terms of pain. The more frequent, the more painful. But yeah, my last one was so short it was really hard to differentiate any of the "phases of labor". I got in the tub at the birth center and suddenly found myself pushing. My husband yelled to my midwife "Wait, she JUST STARTED LABOR. It's not time to push yet is it?" lol.gif


Me whistling.gif Wife / SAHM / Musician/ Actress/ Queen of this castle. Progeny: William (January 2007), Tristan (November 2008) and expecting Lukas stork-boy.gif due January 2012!!  lactivist.gif femalesling.GIFwaterbirth.jpg dishes.gif

Celticqueen is offline  
#19 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 12:35 AM
 
Plummeting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,383
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by Celticqueen View Post

The only difference is that they became more frequent. Maybe that's what people are referring to in terms of pain. The more frequent, the more painful.


No. These are adult women, and I'm quite sure that when we say "more painful" we mean "more painful". "More intense" is ambiguous, but when we say that transition is more painful, that's what we mean - it isn't something we imagine because the contractions are closer together. It isn't that way for everyone, but for some of us, transition was MUCH more painful than the first 8 centimeters, and NOT just because the contractions were closer together, but because they HURT MORE.

 

I had one labor that lasted 4 hours and 50 minutes and one that lasted 52 minutes, if you count from first real contraction. My first labor, the longer one, was very, very manageable until I reached transition. Then, the level of pain easily tripled or quadrupled. Contractions were more frequent, but as an adult woman, I know the difference between more frequent and more painful, and more frequent doesn't mean more painful, they just happen to coincide during transition for many, many women. My second labor lasted 52 minutes from the first contraction that actually hurt to baby in arms. My water broke an hour before the first real contraction and I had a few very minor contractions before that, but I didn't know I was in labor until I hit that 52 minute time frame. I actually do NOT want another labor like that. I found it intensely more painful than the first, I believe it's part of the reason she had a sticky shoulder (I don't think she or I had time to get in a good position for birth), and I seriously hope this baby takes a little longer to make its exit.

BinkieFinder likes this.
Plummeting is offline  
#20 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 01:59 AM
 
josie423's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 972
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Nope! All three labors have been 12 hours almost to the minute.


Single Mama to five 6 and under!
josie423 is online now  
#21 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 04:15 AM
 
jessymama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 33
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

This is true for me.

 

DS1 - 12 hours

DS2 - 3 hours

DD - 56 mins

 

I am counting from first contraction to the birth.

jessymama is offline  
#22 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 08:39 AM
 
BubbleMa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


I've only had one, and it was about 8hrs.  I would love it if this one come in 2-3 hrs! 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by AfricanQueen99 View Post


Thanks for the link. That was my second labor - contractions on top of each other that I couldn't wrap my mind around. I also had a severe tear (my labia was literally hanging on by a thread). Interestingly enough, that kid was 8.12 at birth so not small by any means, there was no IV/pitocin and I've never touched cocaine in my life.
I do hope #3 is quick, but I'd like to be more emotionally present for that birth.


I'm curious, what does that mean?  Is there a correlation between iv/pitocin/cocaine and size??  I've never heard that before.

 

 


Sarah, partner to J and mom to DD1 April 30th, 2002 and DD2 May 5th, 2012. love.gif

BubbleMa is offline  
#23 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 10:18 AM
 
Jaimee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Seattle, Tucson, Austin, Baltimore. Now: Urbana, IL
Posts: 7,473
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

#1: 20 hours, 45 min. of pushing

#2: 5 hours (after a couple weeks of prodromal labor, which dilated me to 5+cm prior to labor), about 2 1/2 pushes

 

Third labors are notoriously wild cards.  I posted a couple threads about this a while back and got a whole lot of different answers about third births.  Here's one: http://www.mothering.com/community/t/1312847/third-labors-and-births-discuss.  So I figure I'll put my expectations somewhere in the middle of my two and be pleasantly surprised if it's faster.


Mama to Avalon 1/07 waterbirth.jpg, Austin 1/10 in between uc.jpgand Avery 12/11  h20homebirth.gif
fambedsingle1.gif   femalesling.GIF   winner.jpg   cd.gif     ecbaby2.gif  novaxnocirc.gif   goorganic.jpg  

Jaimee is offline  
#24 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 11:32 AM
 
AfricanQueen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,657
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by BubbleMa View Post

I'm curious, what does that mean?  Is there a correlation between iv/pitocin/cocaine and size??  I've never heard that before.

Check out the link that I was quoting in the post you quoted.  It was discussing precipitous labor and different pieces that might make babies come faster.  I was just noting that I didn't fall into the guidelines mentioned, but my second kid was just plain fast.  So fast, in fact, that I was in my hospital room for 15 minutes before I had a baby in my arms because I had heard that babies tend to cut birthing time in half so I (wrongly) assumed my second would take six hours as my first took twelve.  WRONG! 

 

I'm planning another hospital birth this time and am putting together a small kit just in case this kid comes out faster than 1.5 hours and I can't get someone to my house to get me to the hospital.  If labor starts while my husband is at work (20-40 minutes away, depending on traffic) I can't imagine that I'll make it to my hospital 7 minutes away.
 

 


Angela
Chatty Girl - 3/2006, Lovey Boy - 1/2010, Delicious Baby Girl - 1/2012
AfricanQueen99 is offline  
#25 of 79 Old 10-16-2011, 11:58 AM
 
BubbleMa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by AfricanQueen99 View Post

Check out the link that I was quoting in the post you quoted.  It was discussing precipitous labor and different pieces that might make babies come faster.  I was just noting that I didn't fall into the guidelines mentioned, but my second kid was just plain fast.  So fast, in fact, that I was in my hospital room for 15 minutes before I had a baby in my arms because I had heard that babies tend to cut birthing time in half so I (wrongly) assumed my second would take six hours as my first took twelve.  WRONG! 

 

I'm planning another hospital birth this time and am putting together a small kit just in case this kid comes out faster than 1.5 hours and I can't get someone to my house to get me to the hospital.  If labor starts while my husband is at work (20-40 minutes away, depending on traffic) I can't imagine that I'll make it to my hospital 7 minutes away. 

 



Gotcha, thanks! :)


Sarah, partner to J and mom to DD1 April 30th, 2002 and DD2 May 5th, 2012. love.gif

BubbleMa is offline  
#26 of 79 Old 10-17-2011, 12:35 AM
 
Beverly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden by way of Idaho
Posts: 505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

My labors are sort of all over the place. 

 

#1 -- 8 hours

#2 -- 17 hours

#3 -- 5 hours

#4 -- 8 hours

#5 -- 18 hours

 

Also, numbers 1,2, and 4 came "early" and number 3 and 5 were "late."  There's no rhyme or reason that I can see. :)


At-home mom to a teenager, an infant, and three in between!
Beverly is offline  
#27 of 79 Old 10-17-2011, 11:32 AM
 
mama2eb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 192
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

1st labor was about 8 hours

2nd and 3rd were both about 1-2 hours after things got painful and I could tell that contractions were happening..which meant that I knew I was in labor even though technically started earlier....for me they tend to start hurting around 6-7 cm dilated and 2 minutes apart..... 1st was with uber-epidural which sucked because i couldn't feel ANYTHING...my 2nd was without pain meds and 3rd an induction with pitocin which was interesting that the 2nd two were still so similar...


Married to CH (2005) and mother to DS1 (6/2006), DS2 (8/2008) and DS3 Sept 22nd, 2011!   

mama2eb is offline  
#28 of 79 Old 10-17-2011, 07:08 PM - Thread Starter
 
Celticqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


Quote:
Originally Posted by mama2eb View Post

1st labor was about 8 hours

2nd and 3rd were both about 1-2 hours after things got painful and I could tell that contractions were happening..which meant that I knew I was in labor even though technically started earlier....for me they tend to start hurting around 6-7 cm dilated and 2 minutes apart..... 1st was with uber-epidural which sucked because i couldn't feel ANYTHING...my 2nd was without pain meds and 3rd an induction with pitocin which was interesting that the 2nd two were still so similar...



Yeah, that's something I've never understood about my own labors. What's up with not feeling any pain until 6-7 cm? Last time around, I got checked at the water birth center and was 6 cm. Didn't feel a thing. They told me I could go home. It wasn't until an hour later I started feeling pain (about 7 cm or more). I suppose that's why I don't understand the transition thing...For me, "transition" IS labor in its entirety


Me whistling.gif Wife / SAHM / Musician/ Actress/ Queen of this castle. Progeny: William (January 2007), Tristan (November 2008) and expecting Lukas stork-boy.gif due January 2012!!  lactivist.gif femalesling.GIFwaterbirth.jpg dishes.gif

Celticqueen is offline  
#29 of 79 Old 10-17-2011, 07:43 PM
 
philomom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 9,430
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
1st labor ....8 hours

2nd labor.... 6 hours

3rd labor .... 1 and a half hours
philomom is offline  
#30 of 79 Old 10-17-2011, 07:47 PM
 
lizsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Quote:


This is probably going to sound stupid, but what is this "transition" people keep talking about? It's supposed to hurt more? My labor started out with really strong contractions and stayed about the same throughout. At some point, my body started pushing, but the pain was the same as before.

 


I know that women's experiences of transition can be quite varied, but I knew I had hit transition because I started throwing up (around 7cm) and continued vomiting periodically until my DD was born.  I also started to feel shaky and cold and my contractions became more painful.  

 

I can't comment on the length of labor question because I've only given birth 1x so far (15 hours).  In some ways faster would be nice, but after hearing stories of precipitous births, I'd really like to have enough time to do basic preparation- getting DD to grandma's and DH home from work!

 


Mom to DD born March 2010, and someone new March 2012

lizsky is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off