"Babies Just Get Bigger..." - Page 2 - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#31 of 37 Old 01-20-2013, 05:22 PM
 
tanyam926's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My last baby and second home birth was my smallest at 8# 4 oz. My second baby and first homebirth was 10# 12 oz and by far the easiest and least painful. First baby was in hospital and weighed 8# 7 oz, so it's not always the rule.

Wife to dh, Mommy to ds1 12/2002, ds2 9/2005, and ds3 9/2008.
tanyam926 is offline  
#32 of 37 Old 01-20-2013, 05:58 PM
 
Calladona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Odenton MD
Posts: 484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Mine:

 

DD1 - 40w3d - 7lb14oz

DD2 - 38w1d - 7lb 6oz

DS1 - 39w1d - 8lb14oz

 

So, yes, for me, they did get a little bigger (I imagine if DD2 had been "late" like DD1, she would've been bigger).  DD1 was a scheduled c-section.  DD2 was an easy VBAC with a 45 minute pushing phase.  DS1 was a much harder (but also quicker) VBAC with a 30 minute pushing phase.  Obviously a hard labor hasn't made me avoid doing it again, since I'm 9 weeks with #4.


Susan, mama to Catherine (June 2008); Becca (April 2010); John (January 2012); and Julia (EDD August 2013)
Calladona is offline  
#33 of 37 Old 01-20-2013, 06:08 PM
bec
 
bec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,036
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

DD1 - 41w - 10lb 6oz - C-section for FTP (hospital was impatient)

DD2 - 40w - 10lb 7oz - HBAC - She was also posterior and had a ginormous head!

DD3 - 40w - 7lb 10oz - HBAC


Mama to: Katie, Emily , and Abby
Not perfect, Just amazing!
bec is offline  
#34 of 37 Old 01-22-2013, 08:57 PM
 
spruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,608
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
My babies don't follow this pattern. They have been:

Girl, 6 lbs, 11 oz, 3 days past EDD

Girl, 8 lbs, 0 oz., 21 days (yep, 21), past EDD

Boy, 7 lbs 10 oz, 10 days past EDD

Boy, 8 lbs 7 oz., 7 days past EDD

Girl, 6 lbs, 8 oz., born ON her EDD


For me, the bigger issue was boy vs girl. Even my 3 week-over baby was still only 8 lbs.

:hugs:


Love, p

Bookworm Mama to 6 wonderkids and stepmama to one more: 22, 21, 18, 13, 10, 8 and our Z born April 2013. . Partner to my       
spruce is offline  
#35 of 37 Old 01-23-2013, 07:10 AM
 
jessica_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

My first was 9lbs 7oz, no tearing :D 

Second was 8lbs 5oz, no tearing or injuries with him either. They were both born pretty close to their due date. 


Jessica, wife to Greg since 7/04, mama to the rainbow1284.gif Gman 7/06, 3 brokenheart.gif , rainbow1284.gif Asher 1/11 and a wonderful surprise due in August!

jessica_s is offline  
#36 of 37 Old 01-24-2013, 08:42 AM
 
LadyCatherine185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Powhatan, VA
Posts: 3,376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

First of all I would definitely find a care provider that is VBAC friendly and pro-natural birth.

 

My first was 9 lbs 3 oz's, born at 40 weeks- 15 inch head circumferance, no tearing

My second was 9 lbs even, born at 42 weeks- 14.5 inch head circumferance, again no tearing

 

not a big difference in size, but there was a 2 week gestation difference, so DS1 may have been closer to 10 lbs by 42 weeks..

 

I am 38+ weeks pregnant with my 3rd, and my MW thinks he will probably be between 8.5-9 lbs as well.

 

If you are truly concerned about size, you can cut out sugar and refined carbs and that will help grow a smaller baby


Catie belly.gif- Happy wife to Aaron stillheart.gif(01.05), mama to Liambikenew.gif(08.08), and Ian jammin.gif (11.10)! homebirth.jpgnocirc.giffamilybed1.gif and joy.gif due Feb 2013 with blessing #3!

LadyCatherine185 is offline  
#37 of 37 Old 01-24-2013, 06:31 PM
 
irishsweetie83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I dont know if this helps but i had a 9lbs2.4oz baby and then 2 more babies under 8 lbs. so its not always true. also its not the over all size and weight of baby that matters but the head size, what position you are giving birth in ect.. if you were to be on your hands and  knees during your pushing stage that would help alot, another position that would give you more room about 25% mor room is squatting.

irishsweetie83 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off