27 weeks and measuring 22 weeks - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 11 Old 11-04-2013, 09:39 PM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Saw a different midwife in the practice today and she measured my fundal height as being behind. She said if it were just a little off she would let it ride but it was enough off that she is concerned that there is a problem either with the baby's growth or with my fluid levels. She referred me for an ultrasound but I can't get in for 4 more days. I do plan on getting the ultrasound but I am wondering as well what experiences other people have had with this. Up until now this pregnancy has been pretty uneventful and the baby measured on target when I had the anatomy scan at 22 weeks. My daughter was a very average 7 lb 10 oz at birth and I don't recollect having this problem with her. I think I have gained less weight this time around, but it's still somewhere in the realm of the expected weight gain at this point. 

erigeron is offline  
#2 of 11 Old 11-07-2013, 03:23 PM
 
pokeyac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 3,517
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
erigeron, I'm sorry I don't have any experience to share, but I'm bumping this up to see if it catches someone else's attention. I hope everyting is a-ok with your baby!



Married to a wonderful woman since 2010. Baby boy C arrived in June 2013!

Check out our User Agreement.
pokeyac is online now  
#3 of 11 Old 11-07-2013, 04:52 PM
 
Katie8681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
The greatest likelihood is that the different midwives have slight differences in how they measure fundal height. Possibly coupled with the baby happening to be transverse instead of longitudinal or something like that. I wouldn't sweat it too hard although I know that's easier for me to say than for you to do! smile.gif

At home amongst the redwoods treehugger.gif with my husband and my son, born 7/5/11 familybed1.gif  Instant CNM, just add caffix.gif !

Katie8681 is offline  
#4 of 11 Old 11-07-2013, 06:04 PM
 
sierramtngirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: In the mountains...
Posts: 322
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Erigeron - my last pregnancy with DD she consistently measured 3-5 cm "behind" from about 27 weeks until she arrived. She was born at 6# 14oz & 19.5 inches. We never figured out why the measurements were "off". Hope all's well.

Sierra, wife to DH , Mama to DD (2012) and DS(2014). In love with my family and hoping for inner .
sierramtngirl is online now  
#5 of 11 Old 11-07-2013, 06:21 PM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie8681 View Post

The greatest likelihood is that the different midwives have slight differences in how they measure fundal height. Possibly coupled with the baby happening to be transverse instead of longitudinal or something like that. I wouldn't sweat it too hard although I know that's easier for me to say than for you to do! smile.gif

Yeah, that is my thought as well. It's just frustrating. And the midwives in this practice do share patients--we could be seen by any of the 3 of them in labor, so we see them all at different times for prenatal care. I would think that they would have kind of worked some of this out among themselves, unless they are constantly sending their patients for ultrasounds due to being too big/too small when measured by a different midwife. 

erigeron is offline  
#6 of 11 Old 11-07-2013, 07:17 PM
 
BethaniaDawn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 133
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I can see different midwives being a tad bit different but the way they learn to measure is pretty straight forward.  No way would one measure you at 5 cm different from another.  My guess is baby was laying transverse or something.  Chances are the ultrasound will show baby is just fine but I do think you are right to get it done.  Wish I was more help!

BethaniaDawn is offline  
#7 of 11 Old 11-08-2013, 06:37 AM
 
nikwhit76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Lehighton PA
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

What did you measure last time? Do you remember? It could be the way she measured you, is it a big gap from last time? 


Momma of 6 beautiful boys.4 stolen, one buried, one a grown man.(20) Starting life again, TTC.
nikwhit76 is offline  
#8 of 11 Old 11-08-2013, 06:38 AM
 
nikwhit76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Lehighton PA
Posts: 68
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BethaniaDawn View Post
 

I can see different midwives being a tad bit different but the way they learn to measure is pretty straight forward.  No way would one measure you at 5 cm different from another.  My guess is baby was laying transverse or something.  Chances are the ultrasound will show baby is just fine but I do think you are right to get it done.  Wish I was more help!

I also agree with this, at this point, it could really be  a number of any non alarming reasons, stay calm, and good luck:)


Momma of 6 beautiful boys.4 stolen, one buried, one a grown man.(20) Starting life again, TTC.
nikwhit76 is offline  
#9 of 11 Old 11-08-2013, 06:26 PM
 
Katie8681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Keep in mind that fundal height is +/- 3cm from # of weeks. At 27 weeks you can measure as little as 24cm and as big as 30cm and be considered size=dates. Of course your personal growth trend is very important too.

At home amongst the redwoods treehugger.gif with my husband and my son, born 7/5/11 familybed1.gif  Instant CNM, just add caffix.gif !

Katie8681 is offline  
#10 of 11 Old 11-08-2013, 08:03 PM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I think I was outside of that +/- 3 range. Anyway, everything was dandy on the ultrasound. The baby is average-sized and my fluid levels are fine. He's breech, though. I wonder if him having his butt nestled down in the pelvis might be contributing to me carrying lower. I go back to the midwives in two more weeks and we'll see where we're at. He's so vigorous. I just kept thinking, okay, I'm going to get this scan, but it's really hard to think there could be a problem with this baby.  

erigeron is offline  
#11 of 11 Old 11-09-2013, 01:48 PM
 
Katie8681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Glad you got reassurance! smile.gif

At home amongst the redwoods treehugger.gif with my husband and my son, born 7/5/11 familybed1.gif  Instant CNM, just add caffix.gif !

Katie8681 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off