Join Date: Jul 2005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by NYCVeg
For the women who test high risk for Down's--approximately 5% of all test-takers--95-98% will prove to be false positives (this is why we're refusing this test). The odds that you actually have a Down's baby are exceedingly slim. This test was actually never intended as a screening test for all pregnant women (just for high risk women), but doctors pushed for it to avoid lawsuits from women who did end up having babies with problems.
Originally Posted by gethane
First, I didn't do the quad screen, so I'm not really an advocate. However, I don't think this is really true. From the research I did for it, it WAS intended as a screen for all pregnant women. The fact is that 70% of all down's babies are born to women UNDER 35. And only those over 35 were being screened with ultrasounds and amnios. So most cases weren't being caught. So they specifically worked on a screening test to be administered to those under 35, to catch more cases.
|When the AFP-screening test kit was first introduced, the FDA regulated and allowed its use only in research settings. However, pressure from physicians and laboratories prompted the FDA to withdraw regulating screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) advised its members to offer the test to all pregnany women as part of a liability alert. This alert was for the benefit of doctors, not women. It was mean to prevent lawsuit.|
|14 members and 10,819 guests|
|AllTomorrowsParties , bayremoter14 , customphotoprops , Dovenoir , fosteringdevon , foursea21 , glance , greenemami , happy-mama , Janeen0225 , katelove , NaturallyKait , RollerCoasterMama , useherbal5|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|