Consent to HIV testing? Did you do this? - Page 4 - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#91 of 98 Old 04-27-2007, 12:41 PM
 
alegna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,826
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mommysusie View Post
I've consented everytime. The doctors I have went to won't treat you unless you consent.
Wow. Wouldn't touch THOSE drs with a 10 foot pole....

-Angela
alegna is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#92 of 98 Old 04-27-2007, 04:31 PM
 
k9sarchik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Never never land
Posts: 1,351
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I did not consent, originally, and then the Kaiser CNM told me that the baby would be tested at birth so I went ahead with the test. Figured it was no big deal because I knew it would be negative. Found out after the fact that the CNM lied to me. There is no such law to test newborns in Colorado.

Then I read that there is a chance of having a false positive when you are pregnant which happened to a woman in Denver. She was forced to take AZT anti AIDS drugs to prevent the baby from getting HIV. She later found out after the baby was born that she never had HIV.

Could you imagine having a positive? What horrible feelings you would have or how your DH may feel about you or future sex.

If you know your history and your Dh's history then don't bother.

Needless to say I have switched to a homebirth midwife now.

Laura~ wife to my stuntman, Stig, mama to Gavin Rutgar reading.gif(4) and now Wyatt Andreas (1) and 2 little angel1.gif.

k9sarchik is offline  
#93 of 98 Old 04-27-2007, 05:27 PM
 
Rico'sAlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern Berkshire County, MA
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by quirkylayne View Post
I consented because my OB asked me to have it. In the unlikely event that a hospital worker would come into contact with my blood I would want them to know for sure if I had HIV/AIDS. I guess it was a put myself in their shoes kind of thing. I had the regular prenatal panel done and they took it as part of that, so it was no extra work on my part and covered by my insurance.

I thought healthcare workers were supposed to take "Universal Precautions" and assume that any and all blood they may come in contact with is potentially infected.
Rico'sAlice is offline  
#94 of 98 Old 04-29-2007, 11:59 PM
 
rayo de sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 993
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would never consent to being tested for anything--especially not for HIV. False positives are very common, and it would be unspeakably horrible to be forced to take medications for HIV while pregnant.

Also, some experts have asserted that there's no evidence that HIV causes AIDS. They say that HIV is just a harmless virus, and that AIDS is caused by drug use and other things that depress the immune system. Read this book for a very eye-opening explanation of the politics of AIDS: Inventing the AIDS Virus by Peter Deusberg.
rayo de sol is offline  
#95 of 98 Old 04-30-2007, 12:27 AM
 
hey_baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I consented but I consent to every possible test that might be an indicator that I might need to take extra precautions to insure the safety and health of my baby. I didn't have any reason to think I might actually have HIV but I don't have any reason to think I'd be RH- either. I err on the side of absolute paranoia.
hey_baby is offline  
#96 of 98 Old 04-30-2007, 01:20 AM
 
Ackray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Sea
Posts: 2,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rico'sAlice View Post
I thought healthcare workers were supposed to take "Universal Precautions" and assume that any and all blood they may come in contact with is potentially infected.
Yes they are. However, accidents happen. I accidentally stuck myself with a patient needle years ago. I was being careful and following Universal Precautions. I had to be tested and retested and we had to have the patient consent to being tested to blood borne diseases. I wish I could wear a hazmat suit to work because aside from that needle stick, I've also been splashed with blood, vomit, amniotic fluid, spit, meconium, urine, sweat, breast milk... There's probably more grossness that I've touched and luckily usually just my clothes get it. Like I said, accidents happen.

I consented to the HIV test. I trust my own knowledge and I trust my doctor.
Ackray is offline  
#97 of 98 Old 04-30-2007, 01:28 AM
 
terrabella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: holiday knitting hell
Posts: 738
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
As some others have said, yes and then no. With my first I was only a less than two years with his dad, so yeah, I thought it a good idea. And again with his brother, because we concieved when baby#1 was only six months old, and I had heard that it doesn't always show up early (???), but most recently, no I refused, because I *knew* I was safe. I avoid as much of these things as I can responsibly do.
terrabella is offline  
#98 of 98 Old 04-30-2007, 01:47 AM
 
weliveintheforest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 5,521
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was tested my first pregnancy before I knew about the false positives... I wouldn't bother again.

BC Mum of four ('05, '07, '11 and 06/14!)     
weliveintheforest is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off