Mama to DS (5) and DD (2)
Is there a reason why they aren't being locked and archived? The number of old threads being bumped up is getting to be really high. I feel bad because brand new members are not realizing how old the threads are and that they are not likely to get a response. Plus it just clutters up the board and new posts.
Pam Cliff Malachi 5/08 Judah 5/10 Eden 8/12 Asher 8/12
You can't get a cup of tea big enough or a book long enough to suit me. ~CS Lewis
We installed a modification on our previous platform to auto-lock old threads. That modification does not work on our new platform.
As well, we found it to be an issue for members who posted personally identifying information earlier on in their membership and wanted to edit but could not because of the locked threads. That required them to send us a list of URLs to manually unlock for them, which became pretty tedious work.
Posting to an old thread does bump it up to the top of the forums list and many people don't pay attention to the date and the conversation carries on. It can be an issue if the thread is about someone's personal situation, like a pregnancy problem. In that case you can either post to let the new member know the discussion is dated and may not get a response or you can report the post to the old thread and mention that it is in response to a very old post and then we'll let the new members know.
|38 members and 15,312 guests|
|aparent , bananabee , BarefootBrooke , BirthFree , Bow , Dakotacakes , debigebi , Deborah , floss&ferd , girlspn , greenemami , hillymum , Iron Princess , jwood723 , kathymuggle , Leelee3 , lerlisha , lhargrave89 , LibraSun , Lydia08 , mama24-7 , mckittre , Michele123 , NaturallyKait , NiteNicole , oceandrop , redsally , RollerCoasterMama , samaxtics , sciencemum , Skippy918 , sren , SweetSilver , verticalscope , worthy , zebra15|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|