CDC: C-section Triples Neonatal Death Rate - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 5 Old 09-14-2010, 11:05 AM - Thread Starter
 
Nanette56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 988
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thought this was an interesting article. It surprises me it took them this long to come out with this study- I thought it was common sense!

http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...al.html?cat=25

Wife (32) of 8 years to DH (33), Mom to Logan geek.gif (7), and Tristan and Cael, twins.gif the wee ones, born 3/18/11! And OMW a surprise babyf.gif due 2/2013!
Nanette56 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 5 Old 09-14-2010, 12:25 PM
 
MegBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I mentioned that stat on MDC a few months ago & someone replied that it was actually not a very good study. I forget the details - maybe they weren't comparing low-risk pregnancies that resulted in CS to low-risk pregnancies with vaginal births? I can't recall.
&, obviously you'd need to try to compare 'apples to apples' in that regard in order to really isolate CS as the independent variable to see if CS alone increases neonatal death rate.

Hopefully that same person will post again.
MegBoz is offline  
#3 of 5 Old 09-14-2010, 01:03 PM
 
Banana731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: the wild Midwestern Woods...
Posts: 3,697
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, that's pretty grim. I do hope the person who felt the study was poorly done posts again. I'd like to hear more about it.

Banana, doula wife to Papa Banana and mother to Banana One, Banana Two, Banana Three, Banana Four...

Banana731 is offline  
#4 of 5 Old 09-14-2010, 01:46 PM
 
Gena 22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Hmmm, the article claims to have adjusted for risk factors. That would be startling if correct. I knew there was an increased risk, but didn't know it was that high.

Thanks for the link!

Mom to : Belle and Izzy
Gena 22 is offline  
#5 of 5 Old 09-14-2010, 02:56 PM
 
turnquia's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 504
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think there are some things off with the study. Because some of those c-sections were done on high risk women, with poor prognosis in the first place. I read over the data. They pretty much compared all the c-sections and neonatal death rates. VS vaginal birth and death rates.

That said.. some c-sections are done to save mother's life or babies life and are done VERY prematurely. So yes neonatal deaths happen more when baby is NOT full term or even close to full term.

BUT I think the CDC is on the right track and starting to really examine that C-sections are NOT the safer way to go.

Mama to a zoo!
turnquia is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off