Alright, I'm gonna ask. What's up with the MANA study? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 8 Old 11-08-2011, 04:29 PM - Thread Starter
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,796
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)

I feel like I've read about the MANA research many times while re-researching homebirth for my second birth.  I just read it again and thought I'd just ask once and for all.  :-)  What is the deal with this MANA study?  Why are there people out there casting suspicion about the reasons the results haven't been published?  When will they be published?  

 

ETA:  I mean this data that is supposed to be complete, compiled and etc. and that is not public/published.  


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
#2 of 8 Old 11-09-2011, 08:56 AM - Thread Starter
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,796
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)

I thought of some more questions.  I guess it's called the "MANA Statistics Project".   From their site it seems as if they contributed some statistics to a study in 2005.  At this point I am not sure if all the other information I've read about it is from reliable sources.  For instance Dr. Amy T. has a lot to say on the subject but I don't want that to be my original source for information, yk?  Unfortunately, there isn't much information available on line...unless I'm looking in the wrong places. 

 

Does anyone have any information about it?  


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
#3 of 8 Old 11-10-2011, 06:19 AM
 
Thursday Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fl
Posts: 5,641
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I'd be interested to hear more about this as well.


Courtney and Cree, baby made 3, added one more then there were 4, sakes alive, then we had 5, another in the mix now we have 6!

A Momma in love with her Little Women-Jewel Face, Jo Jo Bean, June Bug, and Sweet Coraline.

 

 

Thursday Girl is offline  
#4 of 8 Old 11-10-2011, 06:44 PM
 
prothyraia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Borean Tundra
Posts: 2,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

lurk.gif

prothyraia is offline  
#5 of 8 Old 11-19-2011, 03:37 PM
 
junebugmidwife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A cold, cold land
Posts: 297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I was just at the MANA conference last week, so here's what I think the story is:  My understanding is that it's in raw form.  They will release data to someone with a research proposal for that purpose.  So far they have not had the human power to compile and publish outcome data, but the plan is to do so in the relatively near future, and then do so annually in the interest of transparency.

 

I don't think they are trying to be difficult to work with, and it sounds like many organizations that compile health statistics do the same thing.  We all know that stats can be manipulated by those who have an agenda, and I think they're trying to protect against that by only allowing individuals with a research plan to access the data at this time.  I think they said so far only one person had requested it, and was granted access for her Master's in Public Health project, and they have a few other applications pending.

 

HTH!

IdentityCrisisMama likes this.
junebugmidwife is offline  
#6 of 8 Old 11-20-2011, 06:42 AM - Thread Starter
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,796
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)


Thanks for posting, Junebgmidwife!!   

Quote:
Originally Posted by junebugmidwife View Post

I was just at the MANA conference last week, so here's what I think the story is:  My understanding is that it's in raw form.  They will release data to someone with a research proposal for that purpose.  So far they have not had the human power to compile and publish outcome data, but the plan is to do so in the relatively near future, and then do so annually in the interest of transparency.


That sounds good!  I am looking forward to being able to read the data myself.  

 


Originally Posted by junebugmidwife View Post

I don't think they are trying to be difficult to work with, and it sounds like many organizations that compile health statistics do the same thing.  


That all sounds reasonable.  I wonder if MANA had released at statement stating as much.  I think considering how vocal some anti-HB folks are it would be a good idea if they haven't already done so.  

 

Unfortunately, as understandable as it may be to allow the raw data to people with a research plan (and presumably credentials that demonstrate that they are able to make good use of raw data), I can see how easily it is to cast suspicion about that.  Combine that with no official word from MANA along with their laborious (and expensive!) application to view their data, the public information about the study from their website, which does not inspire trust (imo), I'm not surprised at all that so many people are talking about this.  

 

Thanks to you for shedding a little light on the subject.  

 

Do you happen to know if MANA originally had a pubic plan for this data/study?  It seems like some people out there are kind of expecting the information.  Do you think this is just because MANA initiated a study intended for private use that people found out about or was the study publicized, or are studies ethically bound in some way to public knowledge once they have been taken?  

 

I guess I'm trying to understand how reasonable it is to expect this information and in what time frame.  I, personally, have no idea whether studies are often done for private information, whether it is considered ethical to share or NOT share information, what is a reasonable turn around and etc.  

 

I am accustomed to being able to find both sides to most issues about homebirth.  I love that I can see a mainstream breakdown of an issue AND a more progresseve or even "pro-HB" side of an issue when I search online.  It is somewhat unusual to have such a one-sided accusation about issues facing HB without seeing a reasonable response from the HB community as a whole.  

 

 


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
#7 of 8 Old 11-20-2011, 09:57 AM
 
KmAndrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

. . .

KmAndrews is offline  
#8 of 8 Old 08-03-2012, 05:42 AM - Thread Starter
 
IdentityCrisisMama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 10,796
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)

Does anyone know if there have been any updates? 


Mama to DD September 2001 and DD April 2011 *Winner for most typos* eat.gif
IdentityCrisisMama is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off