I get frustrated that more Docs don't support VBAC - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2011, 09:25 PM - Thread Starter
 
luvymommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

A friend of mine was considering VBAC after her OB suggested it.  However, after meeting with the other doctors with the practice, she got the impression she would end up with a c-section so she decided just to go ahead and schedule it 1 WEEK EARLY.  Not only is it safer to attempt VBAC but it is medically recommended to never schedule a c-section a week before the due date because that puts the infant at risk for lung issues.  Sigh.

 

Below is a link to my blog - my most recent post is on VBAC.  There is an awesome video I found and included with the blog post about one mother's experience with VBAC. Also, I've included a few links to articles that support the importance of improving maternity care and the safety of VBAC compared to repeated cesarean. If you'd like, feel free to comment.  I just get so disheartened with our maternity system sometimes.  

 

http://sweetnaturalchild.blogspot.com/


Mother of one energetic toddler with one more on the way.  Wife to perfect match - my husband of nearly 5 years.
My Blog: http://sweetnaturalchild.blogspot.com/
luvymommy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-22-2011, 09:33 PM
 
labortrials's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

Hopefully she has time to think about it?  Docs insist that it is safer to do ERCS w/o labor, but you're right . . . then you don't know if the baby is really ready to be born or not.  I'd recommend sharing the NIH VBAC Consensus info with her as well as the C/S vs. VBAC info at Childbirth Connection at the very least.  "The Business of Being Born" might be useful too in changing her attitude about women's health.


Kimberly, mom & wife - blogging.jpg about pregnancy and birth
DD 2004; 3 angel1.gif babies 2007-08; rainbow1284.gif twin DDs 2009; DD 7/12/11 hospital uhoh3.gif VBAC bouncy.gifafter 2 cesareans!

labortrials is offline  
Old 05-22-2011, 09:44 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

It sounds like your friend's doc supports VBAC but your friend does not want it. 

MsFortune is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 01:01 PM
 
akind1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,217
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I find that is the case with nearly all my friends; most docs are more than happy to do a RCS, so unless a mama is adamant about a VBAC, the doc is happy to oblige with a RCS, usually the week before the "due" date. I have a couple friends that are bothered by the fact that the docs won't "take" the baby any earlier than 7 days before the due date.

 

All I can do is try to educate, but it a hard thing, especially since I do understand, to a point, not wanting to go through a long labor just to end with another c-section (which is what most of them fear the most). For me, I want to go into it knowing I have done everything in my power to assure a VBAC success; that way if it does not work out, at least I know I tried.


Katrina - Mama to Gabriel  sleepytime.gif 11/20/2009 and Norah vbac.gif 10/11/2011- married to Wayne - geek.gif novaxnocirc.gifbfinfant.giffamilybed1.gifcd.gif&nbspand now new baby Theodore born 3/11/13 vbac.gif

akind1 is offline  
Old 05-23-2011, 06:50 PM
 
AlexisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,208
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

Actually, the ACOG recommendation is not to do it before 39 weeks--not that 39 weeks is a problem. 37-39 week babies were shown to have a higher level of issues and ACOG issued a statement against elective induction or ERCS prior to 39 weeks (barring medical issues). This assumes, of course, that dates are accurate. The danger with a 39 week scheduled delivery is that baby may not really be 39 weeks. 39 weeks for elective repeat is the standard not just in the US, but elsewhere.

 

It is true that failed TOL is the worst scenario. In order of outcome, it's successful vaginal, CS without labor, CS after labor. There are studies supporting this. But, I'm not sure that would be applicable to anyone who went into labor and then went straight to the CS. All the women I know who had lengthy labors and wound up with a CS anyway describe the experience as akin to being run over by a truck. I would think that length and difficulty of labor prior to CS would be a factor.


DD 01/2007, DS 09/2011

AlexisT is offline  
Old 05-24-2011, 02:58 PM
 
ablepearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I definitely agree, there is most liekly a difference in a woman waiting for labor to start and going directly to the hospital for surgery and a prolonged 'failed' TOL.

 

I too recommend BOBB and the book Pushed for woman in this situation.


Meghan~~ Mommy to 4 kiddos with feet and one with a halo.  ribbonpb.gif Our rainbow1284.gif is due January 2012~
ablepearl is offline  
 
User Tag List

Thread Tools


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off