But how close can they be with external palpation? I can feel this baby and all of his limbs and his head. Some times I can feel the curve of his back and see the outline of feet and hands. But I have no idea what that means in actual size.
I had an ob "estimate" size and she said at 37 weeks and a couple days she estimates baby between 8.5 and 9 pounds. The idea of a big baby does not scare me or even concern me at all. But how accurate is a "guess" like that? Is it any more accurate than a u/s can be. (I know you are just feeling length and limbs and not flesh)
Just a curious question!
I'm on another board and read about 10 posts a day where a women is told to have a c/b for a large baby or an induction or a large baby when the estimate they are given isn't even "avergage" weight. (cause isn't average baby birth weight around 8 10?)
An OB? I wouldn't trust her guess unless she trained with old-school midwives... most OBs and MWs are much better at reading an u/s then actually palpating for size.
Megan, you are almost there! One of the mamas in my AP group HBAC'd a 12 pound baby, after having a c/s for her 10lb firstborn because 'the baby was too big'...
The truest answer to violence is love. The truest answer to death is life. The only prevention for violence is for the heart to have no violence within it. We cannot prevent evil through any system devised by mankind. But we can grapple with evil and defeat it, but only with love—real love.
I asked the midwife to hazard a guess that day, she said she doesn't like to do that...fair enough. The ob obliged though with:
"hmm...I'd say 8.5 to 9.5lbs, and it's still growing so it will probably be big!"... (I was 40wks+4days at the time : )
The very next day my daughter was born at a "whopping" 6lbs 2oz.
So far wrong.
I can feel the butt and shoulders, etc., but nothing can tell me how much a baby WEIGHS.
I don't even guess. Or, if I do, I say "Between 6 and 9lbs" laughingly.
I'd ask a practitioners accuracy. My midwife with my dd kept palpating and she'd tell me that the baby "wasn't going to be over 7lbs". She was 9 1/2. :
My current midwives are much more experienced, touchey feeley, more "old school" midwife types....and they've also told me that they are usually fairly accurate.
Anyone can venture a guess, but I think few actually have the intuition and skill to make and EDUCATED guess.
I didn't even ask for an estimate. Yeah, I'm curious but I'd rather weight and find out for sure! But it was better than the old...does this babe feel bigger or smaller than ds? I DON"T KNOW! I weighed 20 pounds more than i do now. EVERYTHING feels smaller (when in honesty this kid does feel larger but who knows!)
Have I mentioned I'm ready to have this baby so I can stop dealing with ppl about having this baby??
It is as accurate as the skill of your practitioner. Most doctors do not bother to become skilled in this procedure since they rely on u/s scans and u/s scans hold up in court more than the results and findings of an external palpitation, no matter how skilled or experienced the practitioner.
The rigidity of the mother's abs may play a role. With my first babe, the midwife and the assistant could not get a hold on my baby's position. They told me my abs were too tight. My next three babies cured that.
~paraphrased from "Forrest Gump"~
You just cannot tell the weight of a baby by palpation. You can throw out a lucky guess, or a range, but it's not about intuition really or experience. It's more a guesstimate based on what they think they feel.
I've seen short babies that have quite a bit of bulk on them that I would have never felt abdominally.
Regardless, the guessing of weight has more to do with women wondering if they have a baby that is too big or too small. We don't need to be feeding into those fears.
|13 members and 11,884 guests|
|conner0 , debigebi , Deborah , emmy526 , jamesmorrow , manyhatsmom , Michele123 , RLias Shop , sren , zebra15|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|