A Live Birth on the Today Show Tomorrow! - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 12 Old 02-01-2010, 02:27 PM - Thread Starter
 
MegBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Guess I wont' be watching the Today show tomorrow morning! They're having this series of stories "inside the operating room." They didn't say if it was a planned CS, but considering the state of American Maternity care, odds are very, very good that it will be highly medicalized!! So if it is vaginal, I'd bet a lot of money it'll involve at least an epidural, if not also pit, AROM, coached pushing, vacuum, managed 3rd stage, immediate separation of mama & baby, etc.

This stuff infuriates me so I will not be tuned in tomorrow!

BTW, I think this is also the same show that interviewed a doc on doulas, didn't bother getting any other opinions or actual SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH & acted like they were a dangerous, risky thing to be involved with.
MegBoz is offline  
#2 of 12 Old 02-01-2010, 06:40 PM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Um, isn't that Matt Lauer's show? The one that recently bemoaned the evil "perils of home birth?" Yea, this oughtta be good.

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is online now  
#3 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 12:20 PM
 
SashaBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 411
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
She had a scheduled c-section because babies run big on both sides of their family and she was overdue.
"two indications that a c-section is a lot safer than a vaginal." that poor woman and every poor woman watching that will believe that.
SashaBear is offline  
#4 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 02:05 PM
 
leavemealone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, it was a scheduled c-section. They said it wasn't scheduled to accomodate the show, but rather for "big baby". Yeah, it was a 10 lb baby, but lots of women birth babies that size and are just fine (myself included). It was too bad the woman wasn't given a chance and that women watching will buy into the "big baby" theory.

I recently changed my username, but I still say "Hello" to all those who know me in real life! Hi P, S, T and K!
leavemealone is offline  
#5 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 02:22 PM
 
SilverFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
that big baby thing drives me BONKERS. my sister had a c/s for a "big" baby... 10lb 6oz... no wilting flower, for sure, but incidentally the EXACT SAME SIZE as my sister was when my mom pushed her out at home. and then the OB had the gall to suggest that my sister would "need" to be sectioned ever after, or monitered and induced early, to prevent another "big" baby.
SilverFish is offline  
#6 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 03:01 PM - Thread Starter
 
MegBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,125
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverFish View Post
that big baby thing drives me BONKERS.
Oh, same here. I posted my Facebook status as, "Why do I torture myself?!" I had been willing to bet that it would be an asinine, infuriating reason for the CS & I was right.

Anyway, the stupid OB didn't even know the US CS rate! When they asked, she replied, "Oh, it varies in different areas, 25-30%." No, it's 32% & change!!!!!!!
I like how she starts out saying that it varies. Yeah, cuz women's health is definitely different in different regions of the USA.

They asked the OB what are common reasons for a CS & she said big baby was a common one, & baby in distress is very common. & of course, that just further reinforces to the women of America how horribly dangerous birth is & we're so lucky to have swift access to OBs who "save" our poor babies from the damage our uterus & vagina would otherwise do to them.

Since late-term estimates of fetal weight can be off by up to 2#, I was SOOOO hoping the baby would actually weigh like 8 & a half! I was wondering what, if anything the OB would say. But he was 10# even.

Finally, isn't it true that ACOG doesn't recommend CS for "suspected fetal macrosomia"????
There are enough idiotic, anti-evidence stuff that ACOG does recommend, so it infuriates me that an anti-evidence based practice they don't recommend is still so common & unquestioned.

Yeah, a friend of mine gave birth to a baby just shy of 10# at home just back in December.
MegBoz is offline  
#7 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 04:32 PM
 
sellendie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 184
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Since late-term estimates of fetal weight can be off by up to 2#, I was SOOOO hoping the baby would actually weigh like 8 & a half! I was wondering what, if anything the OB would say. But he was 10# even.
I was hoping for a lower weight too! Just to prove the point of how unnecessary major surgery is for this reason alone. I could play a pretty vigorous round of a drinking game if you had to drink every time she stated that something was "completely normal".
sellendie is offline  
#8 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 06:44 PM
 
leavemealone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,760
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MegBoz View Post

Since late-term estimates of fetal weight can be off by up to 2#, I was SOOOO hoping the baby would actually weigh like 8 & a half! I was wondering what, if anything the OB would say. But he was 10# even.
A small part of me hoped the same thing. I didn't wish anything bad to happen, but a small part of me hoped that the baby would be like 7 lbs. I know lots of people who would still think that 8 1/2 was a "big baby". I had my second in a hospital and they said it was "their policy to test the blood sugarall big babies - any baby over 8 lbs" - mine was 9 lbs 10 oz. I didn't think 8 lbs counted as a big, but whatever.

I recently changed my username, but I still say "Hello" to all those who know me in real life! Hi P, S, T and K!
leavemealone is offline  
#9 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 07:01 PM
 
emnic77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverFish View Post
that big baby thing drives me BONKERS. my sister had a c/s for a "big" baby... 10lb 6oz... no wilting flower, for sure, but incidentally the EXACT SAME SIZE as my sister was when my mom pushed her out at home. and then the OB had the gall to suggest that my sister would "need" to be sectioned ever after, or monitered and induced early, to prevent another "big" baby.

Yep, right after I pushed my first baby, a 10lb 4oz baby girl out of me, my OB told me we'd have to induce at 37 weeks next time. Ok, thanks for making sure you won't have ME as a repeat patient!

Em, married to Alex, mom to Samantha (11 yrs) and Cullen (5yrs) and Maybe (5/16/2010) Trying to grow 4,000lbs of produce on .2 acres. See my blog!
emnic77 is offline  
#10 of 12 Old 02-02-2010, 07:06 PM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Hey ladies, check this out. The home page for the Today Show features that story. Then below it, there's a link to this story.

Last time they ran that anti-homebirth story, (referenced in my post above), they were flooded with emails and petitions from critics. I wonder if this latest move is to appease us "birthies."

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is online now  
#11 of 12 Old 02-04-2010, 05:27 PM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
http://blog.ican-online.org/2010/02/...isinformation/

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is online now  
#12 of 12 Old 02-04-2010, 07:33 PM
 
trippingbillies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SashaBear View Post
She had a scheduled c-section because babies run big on both sides of their family and she was overdue.
"two indications that a c-section is a lot safer than a vaginal." that poor woman and every poor woman watching that will believe that.
Well golly gee-considering the average size of the babies in my family of origin was 9lbs and I was almost 2 weeks overdue, I should have had a cesction. May I vomit now?
trippingbillies is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off