Bigger than average? - Mothering Forums
View Poll Results: How big was your first full term baby?
Less than 6 lbs 4 2.74%
6 lbs and oz 17 11.64%
7lbs and oz 39 26.71%
8 lbs and oz 45 30.82%
9 lbs and oz 30 20.55%
10 lbs and oz 11 7.53%
11 lbs and up 0 0%
Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:07 PM - Thread Starter
 
WifeofAnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,798
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Is it just me or do the 'crunchier' moms have bigger babies? One of my facebook friends just had a baby a little over 10 lbs and I realized I haven't heard of many small (but full term) babies besides in the 'mainstream'. I think I'll make a survey just for fun.

This Mommy and Military Daddy are loving their son.
DS born Dec 2010 Pregnant with #2, having another !
WifeofAnt is offline  
#2 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:10 PM
 
Youngfrankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,273
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I hear you! So often around here women are having 9+ pound babies! In the "real world" you hear 6 1/2... I know that some women are going to have small babies, no problem, but I wonder if others just "get" to go full term.

Mama to 4. winner.jpghomebirth.jpg
Youngfrankenstein is offline  
#3 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:28 PM
 
AutumnAir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In my head
Posts: 1,780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Interesting question.

DD1 was born at 43+1 weeks and was only 8lb 13oz - which is pretty small for my family. Most babies are a minimum of 9lb in our family.

She was born in the Czech Republic, and while I was pregnant I was advised (by a few different HCPs) not to take prenatal vitamins, and to watch what I ate because I didn't want to have a 'big baby'. When DD was born they totally freaked out about her size - apparently they'd never seen such a big baby before. Assumed she/I had GD, even though I'd done the tests and passed with flying colours, so we had to undergo a whole heap of blood sticks. Most of the babies born there (to normal, healthy-sized women) were in the 5-6 lb range, which to me looks sickly-small for term babies. I have no idea why they were all so small though...

Lisa - mama to Eleanor Rose 01/08 and Saoirse Lily 09/10
AutumnAir is offline  
#4 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:29 PM
 
Banana731's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: the wild Midwestern Woods...
Posts: 3,718
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
possibly more natural minded moms are doing things like the Brewer diet. Higher protein intake=bigger baby? Not for me, we're average sized folk around here no matter how much protein I stuff in my face...

Banana, doula wife to Papa Banana and mother to Banana One, Banana Two, Banana Three, Banana Four...

Banana731 is offline  
#5 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:34 PM
 
~PurityLake~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, US
Posts: 6,153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both of my daughters were 19.5 inches long. My first one was 9 pounds 9 ounces and my second one was a mere 5 pounds 6 ounces.

The difference: 1st pregnancy I consumed large quantities of protein by way of soy protein shakes and ate lots of healthy vegetables. I was also working and working out nearly every day up until 3 days before she was born. Diet and exercise
2nd pregnancy: No exercise. Not as much protein. Breastfed first baby up until I was 3 months pregnant when the pregnancy hormones put a stop to my normally abundant milk supply Conception was only 20 weeks after the birth of my first child, so my body was nowhere near recovered.

1st, bigger baby, was born a mere 3 days past the EDD.
2nd, tiny baby, was born a week or so past the EDD and wasn't getting any bigger.

Katreena, peace.gif 39 year old Alaskan treehugger.gif Mama to 1 hearts.gif and 1 lady.gif gd.gif
 
 
 
 

~PurityLake~ is offline  
#6 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:51 PM - Thread Starter
 
WifeofAnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,798
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I was 8lbs 6oz and the largest baby born in that hospital all day. I used to think that was huge. Now I'm not quite so sure...

This Mommy and Military Daddy are loving their son.
DS born Dec 2010 Pregnant with #2, having another !
WifeofAnt is offline  
#7 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 05:58 PM
 
HeatherB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sugar Land, there is no equal
Posts: 9,090
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I think you're more likely to hear of naturally born larger babies because they're left alone and allowed to be born when they're ready.

For me, my first was 7lb14oz and my 2nd and 3rd were 7-2 and 7-4. So not big! All were born in their own time. With the younger ones, I had a MW who encouraged me to avoid sugars, especially in the 3rd trimester. I did very well with that with #2 (7-2), mostly well with that with #3 (7-4). This time, I'm not doing so well... Trying, but not always succeeding (I say as I eat white-flour-wrapped kolaches). So I'm guessing this one might be about 7-8. But even my first, no-special-diet baby was under 8lbs so I just don't grow them very big!

HeatherB ~ mama to 3 wonderful boys:  reading.gif 03/02; modifiedartist.gif09/04; sleepytime.gif 09/07 - and Eliana, babygirl.gif 11/13/10!  
Founder of Houston Birth Alternatives: Be Informed, Encouraged, Supported birth support group and aspiring midwife.

HeatherB is offline  
#8 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:00 PM
 
JamieCatheryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SW Pa
Posts: 5,121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
8lbs 11oz, a bit on the large side but not huge. Growing up I heard a lot of 7 or 8 lb and change babes. Surely the doctors terrified of big babies, warning against weight gain, inducing at 40 weeks (earlier if the u/s looks big!) make for a lot of small babies. My doctor was scared of big babies, repeatedly said things about it, but DH and I laughed it off. I think her grandchild's birth had a shoulder discotia and that's what really skewed her thinking about baby size.
JamieCatheryn is online now  
#9 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:14 PM
 
eclipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 7,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had smaller babies. My first was 7lbs8oz. 2nd was 7lbs3oz, and third was 6lbs2oz (but he was a month early, so he was pretty good sized for gestation).
eclipse is offline  
#10 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:15 PM
 
lizzylou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 487
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
9lbs14oz but I don't feel that pregnancy was very "crunchy," I did not eat so well!

He was however born at 42 weeks.

Baby Boy 9/08 & Baby Girl 3/11

lizzylou is offline  
#11 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:19 PM
 
MyFullHouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't fit the profile!

I was nowhere near crunchy with my first two, who were 7lb9oz, then 9lb2oz. I got progressively crunchier along the way, while the next two birth weights were 8lb10oz and 7lb15oz. All 4 were born between 40w1d and 42w.

Carrie .. 
Raising a full house- Kings (12, 3, new) over Queens (8, 7)
 
MyFullHouse is offline  
#12 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:25 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
My midwife says she does tend to see bigger babies at home than would be normal for the hospital. Could be not pushing for an induction or automatically assuming GD and pushing for a section or actually allowing women to eat what they need to and not worry about weight gain.

My oldest is 7 1/2lbs. I've had them up to 9lbs. 12oz.

fruitfulmomma is online now  
#13 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 06:34 PM
 
GoBecGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,596
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine were 7lbs14.5oz and 8lbs8oz. I was crunchier the 2nd time, and ate with Brewer in mind (but not strictly Brewers diet). My main difference was that i was hypothyroid the first time (untreated).

I have a really not-very-crunchy friend who had #1 7lbs even and #2 10lbs4oz and there was nothing different about the 2nd pregnancy, he just grew bigger than his sister.

I was a c-section at 37+4 and 8lbs6oz, so i can only imagine i would have been a 10lber if i'd stayed and cooked to 42weeks. My mother and i are both very tall though (her 6', me 5'11") with large frames, so an 8 or 9lb baby is not at ALL large for us.
GoBecGo is offline  
#14 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 07:46 PM
 
MO_Bookwyrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SE Missouri
Posts: 214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My only so far came at 37w, so term, but just barely. he was 6lbs 7 oz.

Aleyna - Mom to 6 yo DS1 wild.gifRascal and DS2 Tiny born 03/24/11
MO_Bookwyrm is offline  
#15 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 07:56 PM
 
ALittleBitCrunchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hogwarts library
Posts: 627
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had a completely uncrunchy pregnancy and delivery that ended with an induction and subsequent CS at 39 weeks. He was over 10#. My next was born at 38 weeks and was just under 10 pounds. My vote helps the average for this board get a little higher but I was completely mainstream My family has a lot of 10 pound babies in it so for us it's just the 'average' size.

WOHM to DS11 and DD9, both T1Ds

ALittleBitCrunchy is offline  
#16 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 08:04 PM
 
Marissamom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,543
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I really think "crunchy" mamas tend to make sure their babies get to cook as long as they need, rather than letting themselves get induced at 40 weeks, and probably worry about weight gain less than some mainstream moms. Though my LO was only 6lb10oz, but I think if I hadn't been as stressed at the time she would have waited a little longer (she was 39 weeks exactly)

Marissa, Partner to J geek.gif, SAHM to A (05/09)fly-by-nursing1.gif and I (03/11)stork-boy.gif. we cd.gif
selectivevax.gifdelayedvax.gifnocirc.giffemalesling.GIFecbaby2.gif part-time and familybed1.gif through infancy. planning ahomebirth.jpg
Marissamom is offline  
#17 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 08:56 PM
 
erin_brycesmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
all three of mine were between 9 and 10 lbs but they were all "late".
erin_brycesmom is offline  
#18 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 09:36 PM
 
gemasita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 1,500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
I think you're more likely to hear of naturally born larger babies because they're left alone and allowed to be born when they're ready.
I agree. I think the crunchier moms are the ones who are more likely to be seeing midwives and going to 42 and 43 weeks! Not as common with a lot of the OB practices. I think even if some moms intend to leave things alone, they get pressured to induce, etc.

Jamie, DW to Jeff, birth and postpartum doula and Hypnobabies instructor.
4 years and 5 IVF cycles in the making, Elliott was born at home in water on 2/2/11.
gemasita is offline  
#19 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 09:53 PM
 
yeahwhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Mine, in birth order, were 7lbs 15oz, 8lbs, 7lbs 14oz, 9lbs 4oz (no idea what happened there!), and 7lbs 14oz. All born within a day of their edd, all came in their own time.
yeahwhat is offline  
#20 of 44 Old 10-22-2010, 10:08 PM
 
MidwifeErika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,852
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first was born at 34 weeks and was 5lb 10oz
My second was born at 39 weeks and was 6lb 8oz
My third was born at 43 weeks and was 8lb 8oz

I don't grow very huge babies at all.

Erika, mama to three beautiful kids (plus one gestating), and wife to one fantastic man.

MidwifeErika is offline  
#21 of 44 Old 10-23-2010, 06:30 AM
 
tireesix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,378
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first and third were in the 7lb range and second was in the 9lb area.

First was an unnecessary induction, they said I was 42 weeks but I knew I was 40 weeks tops. Second babe was 43 weeks (natural) and third baby came naturally at 40 weeks exactly.
tireesix is offline  
#22 of 44 Old 10-23-2010, 11:02 AM
 
cappuccinosmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SW Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,628
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first was under 7 lb. But the next two were 9.15 and 10.8 respectively.

I think one reason may be that 'crunchier' moms don't submit to induction just because a doctor suggests it. Between the increases in multiples births, and the tendancy to induce or cut at 38-39-40 weeks, I think the average baby size must have gone done. Whenever people have an 8 lb baby, everybody goes nuts over how big that is, in the mainstream at least. And they think I'm just flat out insane to have had natural births with babies as big as mine.
cappuccinosmom is offline  
#23 of 44 Old 10-23-2010, 11:34 AM
 
Turquesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,050
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banana731 View Post
possibly more natural minded moms are doing things like the Brewer diet. Higher protein intake=bigger baby? Not for me, we're average sized folk around here no matter how much protein I stuff in my face...
Opposite issue with me. I birthed two 10-pounders. I hadn't heard of the Brewer Diet with the first and deliberately avoided it with the second! (Avoiding it obviously didn't work. He's still big. )

In God we trust; all others must show data. selectivevax.gifsurf.gifteapot2.GIFintactivist.gif
Turquesa is offline  
#24 of 44 Old 10-25-2010, 01:28 PM
 
hildare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: in-the-sticks-off-a-dirt-road, GA
Posts: 2,692
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
by crunchy, do you mean did i chase milkshakes with red raspberry leaf tea?
my first (so far) dd was over 10 lbs at birth. i usually tend towards the crunch, but found my willpower greatly diminished compared to the raving hunger i had throughout the pregnancy (and lack of lunchtime proximity to anything resembling healthy)..
so, in my mind, i am of crunchiness, not necessarily in deed with that pregnancy.

Is it getting lonely in the echo chamber yet?

hildare is offline  
#25 of 44 Old 10-25-2010, 01:35 PM
 
~Demeter~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 5,065
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first was born a few days shy of 42 weeks he was 8lbs 4oz. I was induced with him.

My second was born 10 days past his 'due date' and he was 8lbs 3oz. My smallest baby and coincidentally the hardest to birth thus far. Also an induction but no pitocin.

My third was my earliest baby, he was born a week past his due date. He was 8lbs 12oz, also an induction.

My fourth, induced at exactly 42 weeks (by my calculations, 44 weeks by standard LMP calculations) was 9lbs even. I was probably the 'most' crunchy with her. lol

Kinda curious how #5 will fit into things.

Nic, loving mama to 5 with a SURPRISE 6th on the way.

~Demeter~ is offline  
#26 of 44 Old 10-25-2010, 11:18 PM
 
secondimpression's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm a crunchy mama who made smallish-average babies.

DS was born at 38+6 and 6lbs5ozs
DD was born at 39+6 and 6lbs14ozs

At 2 months and EBF, DS was in the 30th percentile for weight...DD is in the 90th

It's an interesting trend though!
secondimpression is offline  
#27 of 44 Old 10-25-2010, 11:44 PM
 
Smokering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,610
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Meh, dunno. DD was 8 pounds 7, which I thought was average, so I was surprised to get a lot of "Wow, what a whopper!" comments.

Mum had some biggish babies - I was the biggest at 9 pounds 4 - but she had GD. Most of us were induced, so would have been bigger if left to cook. She's plenty crunchy in most areas, but she did have medicalised births.

Of the two other crunchiest families I know, one always has long gestations and big babies (10 and 11-pounders), and the other tends to have small, scrawny babies who so far are all small, scrawny kids. So I don't think I know of a clear pattern within my acquaintance. But I have noticed crunchy mamas are less likely to think an 8 pound 7 baby is "huge", so maybe there's a greater acceptance of biggish as normal?

If decomposition persists please see your necromancer.

Smokering is online now  
#28 of 44 Old 10-26-2010, 12:45 AM
 
MujerMamaMismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,733
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My first, and so far only, babe was 9.4lbs at birth. He was also 22 inches when born. I was 90% conscious of my diet while pregnant and actually lost weight while pregnant. Apparently the personal weight loss didn't impact DS though!

I'm average size, and my mother is tiny, but I was born at 8.6lbs and 20.5 inches long which was pretty big for a first born babe, 31 years ago.

My monster DS is 22mths now and still sits on the 97th centile. I'm sure he'll average out soon - he doesn't have big genes.

Some people just grow big babies.

One gorgeous solstice babe 12/08, two smitten mothers - mothering consciously with conscience and compassion. Birth & Postnatal Doula. Student Midwife. Expecting #2 November '12.

MujerMamaMismo is offline  
#29 of 44 Old 10-26-2010, 01:05 PM
 
mmaramba's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yep, it's induction and "elective" C/S, no doubt.

Most of the babies born there (to normal, healthy-sized women) were in the 5-6 lb range, which to me looks sickly-small for term babies. I have no idea why they were all so small though...

I think you answered your own question when you said the Czech doctors encouraged you not to take vitamins and to eat less. I also wonder if there isn't a higher rate of smoking in the CR.
mmaramba is offline  
#30 of 44 Old 10-26-2010, 03:16 PM
 
Peachthief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CNY- Under the maple tree
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I enjoy looking through the birth announcements in the Sunday paper (the paid ones with the picture and everything) and after doing this for about the first year of DD's life I realized that I could probably count on one hand the ones that were as big or bigger than she was at 9lb 4oz. I realized that many of those who would have been that big (or possibly not quite that big!) were probably induced early due to "big baby". We had a BPP 2 days before she was born which pegged her at 9lbs 3oz- I had heard so much about the inaccuracies of ultrasound that I literally did not give it a second thought (assumed she'd be more like 8lb) until they actually weighed her! Big or not, she had no problem making her way into the world, and no GD either!
Peachthief is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off