Benefits of labor - spontaneous vs. induced - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 3 Old 06-24-2012, 06:17 PM - Thread Starter
 
Mamabeakley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the labyrinth
Posts: 2,080
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

I am a doula and frequently tell my clients (prenatally or during an induction or during labor) about the benefits to the baby of going through the labor process vs. having a scheduled cesarean.  Reading another thread I realized I don't know what the research says about whether those benefits (lower risk of breathing problems, specifically) are more evident in spontaneous labor than in induced labor.  I.e., if I say to someone facing induction "well, at least your baby will have the advantage of going through labor!" is that accurate?

 

I'm interested specifically in studies rather than anecdotal evidence.  Thanks!


Here as mama to W (2/04), R (5/06), D (7/09), and J (12/9/12!), co-parenting with my DH

I WOH part-time, am a doula & childbirth educator, home/unschool, and hope we are nearing the center of chaos


 
  

Mamabeakley is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 of 3 Old 06-25-2012, 12:21 PM
 
mandib50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: my own reality
Posts: 4,698
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

hmmm can't think of any studies off the top of my head. i wonder if any of the midwifery texts have information. i remember reading about it but have no clue where i saw this information now that i'm thinking of it.


Midwifery student , Mama to my 4 amazing kids. treehugger.gif

mandib50 is offline  
#3 of 3 Old 06-30-2012, 01:30 AM
 
amberskyfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

This isn't a study so much as medical and scientific fact, but the benefit you're probably looking for isn't that the labor itself is good for the baby so much as the fact that what actually starts labor is a protein released by the baby's lungs once it is coated in surfactant. Baby needs this surfactant in its lungs to breathe properly and reduce the risk of infection. When the surfactant is in place, that is when the protein is released and the mother goes into labor. So it isn't really the labor that's good for baby's breathing but the surfactant which starts the labor, so by letting the mother go into labor naturally, you know that the baby's lungs contain the necessary surfactant to breathe properly. Delivering the baby earlier than this can put the baby at risk because the lungs are not mature. I don't think I've ever heard of anything saying that the labor itself is good for baby's breathing. Descent through the birth canal pushes fluid from the baby's lungs and prepares it for breathing, but that is another thing entirely.
 


Mama to a bright 5 y/o girl dust.gif and a beautiful boy born 03/10/12 fly-by-nursing1.gif Loving unschooling, 2xuc.jpgfamilybed2.gif ecbaby2.gifand natural living in Hawaii.rainbow1284.gif
amberskyfire is offline  
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off