induction or cesarean? - Mothering Forums

Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 05:42 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shiloh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: listening to kriping churckets
Posts: 6,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have had natural drug free births.
This time I'm on lovenox so they want to induce me. I've heard induction can lead to csections. Should I just ask for a section (and tie my tubes)? I've never had either so on my 5th baby I'm in uncharted territory

8 might be enough
Shiloh is offline  
#2 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 06:15 AM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)

I had my first pit induction last year and it went fine. The nurses were really great about turning it up slowly throughout the night and only as much as was needed to keep contractions coming. I never had the back to back contractions that some women talk about and while it did get very intense and painful at one point, I was able to get through it without pain reducing drugs. I used the tub briefly and moved as much as I could in the limited space and also TENS, which was really great.


fruitfulmomma is online now  
#3 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 06:24 AM
 
MeepyCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)

It really depends on so much.  If the indications for induction are favorable, it could spare you surgical recovery.  If indications are sketchy, then it might be better to just recover from surgery then it is to recover from labor AND surgery. 

 

I worry that lovenox could be a complication for surgery.  What does your doctor say?

MeepyCat is online now  
#4 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 06:38 AM
 
Red Pajama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: climbing a mountain of laundry
Posts: 1,348
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

If you have had natural births before, I wouldn't ask for a section. It's major surgery. Trying for a vaginal induction and ending with a section isn't the worst thing in the world, but isn't the ideal, certainly.

 

I've had a planned section with my twins, and a tried vbac (36 hour labor)  that ended in a section. the second was actually an easier recovery.


Twin boys (2/05) and little sister (10/07)
Red Pajama is offline  
#5 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 10:26 AM
 
lightbulb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)

You can have induction without meds too!
I had to be induced with my last birth, and we used a foley cath, when that had been there for 24 hours (sometimes it'll fall out), my OB checked me while removing it, and she could brake the bag of waters then. And when she broke it, it all just started on it's own with proper contractions right after.

I had 1.5 hours of active birth before he was out, it was a fabulous birth, all natural besides the "start help".

lightbulb is offline  
#6 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 11:07 AM - Thread Starter
 
Shiloh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: listening to kriping churckets
Posts: 6,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have to be off blood thinners like lovenox for 24 hours or they might switch me to heparin and that's 12 hours. I had my last two in 3 hours and 1 hour (start to finish as in less than 1cm to done I don't dilate early even with #3 #4) So there's no real window for me. This one is an anterior placenta, so I am expecting a higher probability of a malposition as that happened with my daughter (4rth degree tear - ouch) I can do natural but natural with the possiblity of vaccum, forcepts, episiotomy those type of interventions no thanks. I guess if we fail the nst we get a section?

8 might be enough
Shiloh is offline  
#7 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 11:42 AM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
I guess if we fail the nst we get a section?

i think it would depend on what part you failed??? But that is why I got induced, she failed both bpp and nst. Her heartbeat was good but she was barely moving, not practicing her breathing, and my water was low. Anyway they wanted to get her out, but not an emergency. I was on the monitor the whole time to make sure she was handling labor well and birthed with the cnm who came on call the next morning. It was about 18 hours total from the time they sent me up until she was born, I was having contractions off and on most of the night but not consistent. They got steady at about 6 hours before birth and hard on about 3 hours before. I went from 4 to birth in about and hour, hour and a half maybe.

 

She also had a anterior placenta and was posterior and breech pretty late, but straightened herself out a few weeks before she was born.


fruitfulmomma is online now  
#8 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 01:06 PM
 
Katie8681's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 676
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Someone who is at risk for a DVT has that much more reason to try to avoid a c/s! If your docs think the safer thing to do is try for inducing first, that's probably the case.

At home amongst the redwoods treehugger.gif with my husband and my son, born 7/5/11 familybed1.gif  Instant CNM, just add caffix.gif !

Katie8681 is offline  
#9 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 01:14 PM - Thread Starter
 
Shiloh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: listening to kriping churckets
Posts: 6,796
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Good point about the dvt and sections.
I'm so pregnant I'm not thinking.
I thought they did the nst to see if the baby was hearty enough for birth...why do they do them?

8 might be enough
Shiloh is offline  
#10 of 10 Old 06-19-2013, 04:40 PM
 
fruitfulmomma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Between the Rockies and a Flat Place
Posts: 4,216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
I thought they did the nst to see if the baby was hearty enough for birth...why do they do them?

 

Different reasons. We had one earlier in the third trimester cause she was having some tachychardia but she passed and it seemed to resolve. They thought maybe I was a bit dehydrated. We did it again the day before she was born because I was not getting much movement from her. Also did the bpp that day. And we had done a bpp about two week before when I hadn't felt movement for awhile. I've had bpp for "late" babies too.


fruitfulmomma is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off