Birth weight and genetics - Mothering Forums
Forum Jump: 
 
Thread Tools
#1 of 26 Old 04-07-2005, 10:51 PM - Thread Starter
 
NYCVeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On my couch
Posts: 5,194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just curious: how much do you think genetics has to do with birth weight? A little, a lot, or not much at all?

Dh and I were both smaller babies (6 lbs 2 oz. and 6 lbs 8 oz., respectively). Does that mean we're more like to have a baby that size?

On the other hand, my mom had babies in lots of sizes: first was over 8 pounds (and breech), my next 2 sisters were 7 pounds and change each, and I was the shrimp. Am I more likely to have a bigger first baby because she did?

Or is it all about the mom's nutrition, fitness, etc. during pregnancy?

Just wondering what you all think and if you know of any evidence (anecdotal or otherwise) on this issue.
NYCVeg is offline  
#2 of 26 Old 04-07-2005, 11:30 PM
 
liawbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: got the boo-less blues
Posts: 2,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, I was small (5# 15oz), but also had gastroschisis.
In my mom's family, all the other babies were 8 pounds or more (my cousins, my son, my cousin's son).
Three of my cousins (two moms) were over 10.
DS was 9#5oz.
None of us had Gestational Diabetes.
Oh, my cousin and I both gained lots of weight. My aunts didn't. One of my aunts is very health conscious and exercised through all her pregnancies. I think my other aunt did too.
SO, in our family, it seems to be genetic.
liawbh is offline  
#3 of 26 Old 04-07-2005, 11:42 PM
 
kim_nz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nz
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
In think in our family it is nutrition during pregnancy.

I was 6lbs 10oz born, DH was 7lbs. Our first daughter was 7lbs 12oz (i ate healthy) our second was 9lbs (i ate a lot of junk!).
With my SIL her first was 8lbs 14oz and she was always eating. With #2 she was only 7lbs 13oz and throu that pregnancy she tried to monoitor how much she ate.

Mumma to 6 wonderful kiddos + stork-suprise.gif due March 2013

kim_nz is offline  
#4 of 26 Old 04-07-2005, 11:43 PM
 
Mom2baldie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North Texas
Posts: 1,468
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't personally feel that genetics has much to do with birth weights, but thats really only because of my experience...

I was 6 lbs 11 oz at birth. I was several weeks overdue and my mom smoked during the pregnancy.

My husband was 7 lbs 14 oz and he was born by scheduled cesarean.

My children were 7 lbs 7 oz (this was a scheduled cesarean birth), 8 lbs 1 oz (spontaneous labor & birth) and 9 lbs 10 oz (another spontaneous labor & birth). I gained 36 lbs, 27 lbs and 33 lbs respectively. It was only with my last pregnancy that I really made sure to eat enough protein...until then I didnt really realize how important it was. I also exercised by walking a few miles a day with each of them.

My 9 lb 10 oz daughter is the biggest baby that my family has had.
Mom2baldie is offline  
#5 of 26 Old 04-07-2005, 11:53 PM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think it's really a combination of genetics and lifestyle (particulary nutrition). I looked after myself in almost the exact same way for both of my successful pregnancies - worked full-time to the end, exercised as much as I could, and ate very similar diets.

My son, fathered by my ex, was 7lb., 12oz. I was the same, and my ex was within a couple of ounces (I can't recall his exact weight).

My daughter, fathered by my husband, was 10lb., 2oz. My husband was 9lb., 13oz, and his brothers were all just slightly behind that - all over 9lb. So, I'm inclined to think that his genes made the difference between my two babies. The one I'm carrying right now (same father) seems to be shaping up to be a fairly large baby, as well.

Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#6 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 02:19 AM
 
wasabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think there is the genetic factor but there are lifestyle choices as well. A pp mentioned her mom smoked during pg so if you've got something like that that depresses birthweight we can't really do a fair comparision. The women in my family have big babies. My mom's smallest was just under 9lbs and her biggest just over 10lbs. My smallest was 9lbs and my biggest was just over 10lbs. My aunts also have babies in the 9-10lbs range. None of us had GD (to the best of my knowledge). I usually gain between 35-45lbs. Nothing too huge and I try to stay somewhat active but I just have big babies. It didn't really surprise me I guess because that's just what I expected. Now my DH on the other hand was only a bit more than 8lbs at birth but he is a very big guy. I guess I've just felt it had more to do with the mom's side.
wasabi is offline  
#7 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 02:39 AM
 
USAmma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 18,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's so hard to say . . .

Dh and I were both 8 pound babies, but both of our girls were smaller than that (7-4 and 6-13). I am a smaller framed person and it's my theory that my body knew just the right size to grow my babies. I gained a LOT with both so it's not like I wasn't getting the calories. My body just likes to grow smaller babies.

7yo: "Mom,I know which man is on a quarter and which on is on a nickel. They both have ponytails, but one man has a collar and the other man is naked. The naked man was our first president."
 
USAmma is offline  
#8 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 03:02 AM
 
Yummymummy74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ~ Buried in growing kiddos!
Posts: 1,531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I read somewhere once that birth weight has a definate gentic link and that it was tied to the paternal side.. as in your fathers lineage.. the women in his background or something..I know my dads mom did not have a baby smaller than 9 pounds.. my kids have all been around that weight.. I was 8'9 and so was my brother.. meanwhile my moms side of the family all had 6 pound babies..
Yummymummy74 is offline  
#9 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 11:43 AM
 
pfamilygal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas, howdy y'all!
Posts: 1,721
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dh was 9#12oz. I was 6#3oz. My kids have been 5#7oz, 5#4oz and 4#15 oz. So they seem to be following after me.

Tamara: hs'ing Christian mom of five here and five in Heaven. Joyfully awaiting Punkin, coming mid-Sept!
pfamilygal is offline  
#10 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 01:36 PM
 
wasabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hmm I've never heard to look at your dad's side. I know my paternal GM did not have big babies because her doc harrassed her so much about not gaining too much weight so I can't do a fair comparision. I had meant to say earlier that my mom and some of my aunts are quite a bit larger than I am. For a person of my size my babies really are pretty big but still I have them. My pelvis accomodates them no problem.
wasabi is offline  
#11 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 01:47 PM
 
watermamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess I will chime in here as well...

I was 10lbs, my mom and her siblings were all between 10lb-12lbs at birth. And my grandmother smoked like a CHIMNEY thru all her pregnancies.

My babies were 9lb2oz and 10lb3oz. I took good care of myself w/the first, but did indulge in more crappy food and little/no excercise. With my 2nd, I gained much less weight, walked 4 miles per day, and ate wonderfully (except the icecream indulgence!). And yet my 2nd was even larger, even with less weight gain, etc.

I really think it is genetic, but I also think lifestyle factors can carry into it.
watermamma is offline  
#12 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 01:47 PM
 
LoveChild421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North GA
Posts: 4,593
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would have to say I think it has 60% do with environmental factors like the mom's diet, weight gain, etc. and 40% genetics

I was 8 lbs 4 oz, 21.75 in long, DH was 9 lbs 8 oz. 23 in long

our son was 7 lbs 8oz and 20.5 in long

I know both my mom and my MIL ate lots of junk food and didn't exercise while prge with us whereas I ate well, mostly organic, and did exercise a few times a week.

Jen read.gif Mama of 2 precious boys blowkiss.gif (9)  flowersforyou.gif (6)  and still in heartbeat.gif with my Matt hat.gif after 12 years together. 

rainbow1284.gif Domestic Violence Children's Advocate and Counselor hug2.gif

 homebirth.jpg bf.jpg nocirc.gif ribbonjigsaw.gif 

LoveChild421 is offline  
#13 of 26 Old 04-08-2005, 02:03 PM
 
darsmama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,294
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was 7 lbs. at birth. My mom smoked a lot and took lots of vitamin E. Besides that, I'm not sure what kind of care she got. The smallest of her kids was her 3rd - he was 6 pounds 12 ounces, the largest was 8 pounds 1 ounce.

I've had the largest baby in the family (besides GD aunt who had 10 lb. 13 ou. baby)
Darlene was 9 pounds 6 ounces at birth. I smoked off and on too during the pregnancy (Long story, DENIAL about having a baby and yes, am a non-smoker now), and I ate pretty healthy I think. Maybe a soda too many once in a while, but I say pretty healthy. I'm overweight and I lost 2 pounds I believe.

My father was 6 pounds 3 ounces, born to a non smoking or drinking mama. BUT - she was one of the smallest preemies to survive. She was only 1 pound 15 ounces when she was born in 1939 I believe. She was slower her whole life...

So I don't know. I believe it is a combination of both...
darsmama is offline  
#14 of 26 Old 04-09-2005, 09:41 PM
 
leosmama20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I personally don't think it is either. LOL I mean, I guess it has to be something but... DH and I were both small babies and I didn't gain ANY weight with my pg due to hyperemesis and I had an almost 10 lb baby. So, who knows!
leosmama20 is offline  
#15 of 26 Old 04-09-2005, 11:10 PM
 
Storm Bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 27,300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd never even thought about maternal weight gain being a factor. I gained about 25 pounds with each of my first two. Of course, there was a 10 year gap between my babies, as well. Do older moms have bigger babies? No GD here, so it's not that.

Lisa, lucky mama of Kelly (3/93) ribboncesarean.gif, Emma (5/03) ribboncesarean.gif, Evan (7/05) ribboncesarean.gif, & Jenna (6/09) ribboncesarean.gif
Loving my amazing dh, James & forever missing ribbonpb.gif Aaron Ambrose ribboncesarean.gif (11/07) ribbonpb.gif

Storm Bride is offline  
#16 of 26 Old 04-09-2005, 11:32 PM
 
momto3g3b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: just this side of crazy
Posts: 301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I want to chime in on this thread, too.

I was 8lb,7oz and my twin brother was 8lb,4.5oz. We were born on our due date. My mom smoked throughout her pregnancy, yet we were her biggest babies (of 5 kids).

My husband weighed 7lb,8oz at birth.

Our children had the following stats:

#1: girl, 7lb,12oz, 37 weeks gestation. I had horrible eating habits, but got lots of exercise during my pregnancy. Developed pre-eclampsia, which necessitated her early birth.

#2: boy, 8lb,14oz, 36 weeks gestation. I miscarried a twin at 20 weeks, had excessive amniotic fluid, preterm labor, pre-eclampsia and a premature birth. My dates were not off (#1 and #2 are only 10.5 months apart and an amniocentesis confirmed the due date) and I did not have GD. I ate much better (more healthy) than my previous pregnancy and continued to get daily exercise.

#3: girl, 6lb,11oz, 38 weeks gestation. I ate VERY healthy but didn't get much exercise during my pregnancy.

#4/#5: boy/girl twins, 5lb,8oz & 5lb,5oz, 35 weeks gestation. I ate extremely well during this pregnancy, but got very little exercise. I developed HELLP syndrome, which necessitated their early delivery. Had they gone to term, both babies would probably have been 8+ pounds each.

#6: boy, 9lb,12oz, 39 weeks gestation. I ate the most healthy of any of my pregnancies, gained the least amount of weight and had my biggest baby. I had no complications with this pregnancy at all. I joke that finally, at age 33.5, my body had figured out how to be pregnant. :LOL

So.......I don't know what the correlation is.
momto3g3b is offline  
#17 of 26 Old 04-09-2005, 11:55 PM
 
stafl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: standing in a doorway
Posts: 9,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
at 5lb, 13oz, I was the largest girl ever born in my maternal extended family.... until DD2 came into this world at 6lb 10oz (a virtual whopper, in comparison)!
DD1 was 5lb, 6oz
my sister was 5lb, 8oz
neice was 5lb, 4oz
my mother and her two sisters were all under 6lbs, as well as my female cousins, and my cousins' girl babies.
stafl is offline  
#18 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 09:58 AM
 
wasabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 2,355
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Storm Bride
I'd never even thought about maternal weight gain being a factor. I gained about 25 pounds with each of my first two. Of course, there was a 10 year gap between my babies, as well. Do older moms have bigger babies? No GD here, so it's not that.
I don't think it does have much to do with it. I mean I see movie stars and models who take the opportunity of being pg to eat and eat and eat some more and gain 60lbs+ and give birth to an average size baby. On the other hand with #1 for me in particular I was very fit and exercised regularly until I have birth, gained 35lbs and had a 9lbs baby. 35lbs is within average weight gains and yet 9lbs isn't. With my next two I gained a bit more than 40lbs and one was just over and the other just under 10lbs. 10 year gap in between #2 and #3 but #3 was slightly smaller not larger than #2. I've always read that maternal weight gain was not particularly correlated to size. I mean if a woman who was underweight only gains 6lbs during pg yes ok she's probably going to have a small baby or if a woman gains 70lbs she could still easily have an average sized baby but I think it's a limited correlation. If you're on a strict diet then yes you may starve your baby and if you pig out at a certain point that's going to your butt not your baby but otherwise within reason I don't think your weight gain is the big factor.
wasabi is offline  
#19 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 10:50 AM
 
Artisan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
There is a genetic factor involved -- the pp mentioned the paternal link to birth weight. I have read the same thing. (I've also read that the length of gestation is closely linked to the father's genetic contribution.) I think what we're missing here, though, is that every baby has their own genes. They may come from parents who were big or small, but they each have their own genetic code telling them how big to be, how tall they will be later in life, etc.

Our first baby was 10lbs. My DH and I were both big babies and are tall people. I probably gained 50lbs during my pregnancy. My second baby -- same parents, same maternal weight gain, same exact gestational age -- baby weighed 8lbs 9oz. She is just a smaller person. She still is a smaller person than her older sibling -- it's just who she is.

Obviously there is an environmental link as well. Adequate protein consumption leads to bigger babies. Other factors contribute to lower birth weight.
Artisan is offline  
#20 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 02:00 PM
 
stafl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: standing in a doorway
Posts: 9,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have read somewhere that a mother carrying a donor-egg baby still has a baby along the same size as the other women in her family, rather than the size of the babies in the donor's family. It would be interesting to see if this is reliable information or not, and would put the whole discussion in a different light.
stafl is offline  
#21 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 03:27 PM
 
Belle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver, (Not BC) WA (Not DC)
Posts: 3,001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was 7lbs,11oz when I was born at 41 weeks. My dh was a premie twin who weighed 5lbs at 36 weeks. Our dd was 8lbs,2oz at 38 weeks. I ate a lot of protein, but I was so sick that most of it came back up, so I only gained 10 lbs. I don't know if it's heredity or what.

Heather Mike Married 8/1/99 Mom to Charlotte Aug 04, Nov 06, and Katherine Oct 07
Belle is offline  
#22 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 04:28 PM
 
angelpie545's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near water, with a refreshing rain
Posts: 6,674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I definitely think that while genetics play a role, the mother's lifestyle and eating habits play a even bigger role, this assuming no health issues such as diabetes or anything. With my first, I ate everything in sight, and didn't really exercise that much, and added 80 lbs to my 115-lb, 5"4 inch frame. My daughter ended up weighing 9lbs, 5 oz. I ended up losing all the weight within a year of having her, and eventually you couldn't tell I had even been pregnant at one time. With my second, I watched what I ate; didn't diet, but made sure to eat all the right things in the right amounts. I ended up gaining 60 lbs anyways, but my second daughter was only 7lbs, 6 oz. The weight ended up coming off with her, although I still have tummy flub and some love handles(it's harder with the second baby!).

Overall I think genetics kind of set a standard, but depending on the mother's lifestyle that can all vary.

Beth, fiance to a wonderful man , mommy to Destiny, 4 ,
and Deanna, 2

Bethany, crunchy Christian mom to Destiny (11) Deanna (9), and Ethan (2)

angelpie545 is offline  
#23 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 04:51 PM
 
stafl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: standing in a doorway
Posts: 9,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
my weight gain during pregnancy had absolutely nothing to do with my children's birth weights. I gained 70 pounds with DD1, who weighed 5lb,6oz. I gained 35 lbs with DD2, who weighed 6lb, 10oz.
stafl is offline  
#24 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 06:27 PM
 
aishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 1,780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
hmm i'm not sure. I was 6 13 born a few days after my due date, my husband was 6 something born six weeks EARLY and our boys have all been 6 something (6 4, 6 7 and 6 15) born 3 and a half to 3 weeks early. I'm tiny & that just seems like the perfect size for me to birth. I figure if I were to go a couple more weeks they would gain HOW much a week?? yikes

I gain weight well during pregnancy too, 30-40 pounds.

aisling
aishy is offline  
#25 of 26 Old 04-10-2005, 08:03 PM
 
GruppieGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,530
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsupialmuma
I read somewhere once that birth weight has a definate gentic link and that it was tied to the paternal side.. as in your fathers lineage.. the women in his background or something
Very interesting!
My FIL was 10 pounds and his mom was very tiny

My dh was only 7 punds, but my MIL has food issues and really kept her weight way down.

My son was somewhere between 11 and 12 pounds.

So that's where he came from.
GruppieGirl is offline  
#26 of 26 Old 04-11-2005, 10:32 PM
 
thepeach80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,203
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Had my boys been born at 42 wks like I was, they would've been about 9#6oz like I was. DH was 6# something, but MIL smoked the whole times, he's a big guy now. AJ was 7#3oz at 38.1 wks. Evan was 7#8oz at 38.5 days. I gained 20 w/ AJ and 10 w/ Evan.

Jennifer, LPN and nursing student, Doula, CPST, and VBAC mama x3 to
AJ (5/03), Evan (12/04), Ilana (11/06), Olivia (2/09), and Unity (8/2012)

thepeach80 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Drag and Drop File Upload
Drag files here to attach!
Upload Progress: 0
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Mothering Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off