Join Date: Dec 2001
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Jennifer, Naturopath and mom
Originally Posted by georgia
You are so fortunate to have had a positive experience with Pit. Itseems the exception is proving the rule
I am reminded, again, how different, every birth is, every woman's body responds to labor, the circumstances surrounding it, the interventions, etc and how important it is to gather information and experiences for ourselves rather than blindly accepting what the medical model might be pushing.
Originally Posted by KittyKat
Pit is horrid evil stuff. I had it with my first (unecessary induction pushed on me by lying EVIL doctor. Yes, he incarnates everything awful about OBs and no, sadly, I am not exaggerating, ask any of the LLL leaders around here and they'll tell you there are dozens of horror stories about this doc)
|My mother only went into labor with 1 out of the 4 of us, never dilated past 3 and had 4 c-sections. Several of her sisters also have this. I felt like somewhat of a success because I managed a vaginal birth. (my goal was also drug free which did not happen obviously)|
Originally Posted by clavicula
i had pitocin, when i started pushing. it was soo hard, but 5 pushes was enough...doc said it would have been longer without pitocin. who knows?
Originally Posted by karinasusy
Pitocin is not used here in Alberta, Canada (I don't know about the rest of Canada), anymore because it is a dangerous drug. Inducing labour might have its place in rare instances, but it is done way too often. The medical community and society have taught us (and the sad part is that many of us believe it) that womens bodies don't work. They use some type of balloon instrument in the cervix to induce labour here, less nasty than a toxic chemical, but still invasive.http://www.inamay.com/
|Induction and Augmentation
In Australia in 2002, approximately 26 percent of women had an induction of labor, and another 19 percent have an augmentation--stimulation or speeding up of labor—through either artificial rupture of membranes or with synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin, Syntocinon).In the US in 2004, 53 percent of women reported that they had Pitocin administered in labor to strengthen or speed up contractions.36
Synthetic oxytocin administered in labor does not act like the body’s own oxytocin. First, Pitocin-induced contractions are different from natural contractions, and these differences can have significant effects on the baby. For example, waves can occur almost on top of each other when too high a dose of Pitocin is given, and it also causes the resting tone of the uterus to increase.37
Such over-stimulation (hyperstimulation) can deprive the baby from the necessary supplies of blood and oxygen, and so produce abnormal FHR patterns, fetal distress (leading to caesarean section), and even uterine rupture.38
Birth activist Doris Haire describes the effects of Pitocin on the baby:
The situation is analogous to holding an infant under the surface of the water, allowing the infant to come to the surface to gasp for air, but not to breathe.39
These effects may be partly due to the high blood levels of oxytocin that are reached when a woman labors with Pitocin. Theobald calculated that, at average levels used for induction or augmentation/acceleration, a woman’s oxytocin levels will be 130 to 570 times higher than she would naturally produce in labor.40 Direct measurements do not concur, but blood oxytocin levels are difficult to measure.41 Other researchers have suggested that continuous administration of this drug by iv infusion, which is very different to its natural pulsatile release, may also account for some of these problems.42
Second, oxytocin, synthetic or not, cannot cross from the body to the brain through the blood-brain barrier. This means that Pitocin, introduced into the body by injection or drip, does not act as the hormone of love. However, it can interfere with oxytocin’s natural effects. For example, we know that women with Pitocin infusions are at higher risk of major bleeding after the birth43 44 and that, in this situation, the uterus actually loses oxytocin receptors and so becomes unresponsive to the postpartum oxytocin peak that prevents bleeding.45 But we do not know the psychological effects of interference with the natural oxytocin that nature prescribes for all mammalian species.
As for the baby, ‘Many experts believe that through participating in this initiation of his own birth, the fetus may be training himself to secrete his own love hormone.’29 Michel Odent speaks passionately about our society’s deficits in our capacity to love self and others, and he traces these problems back to the time around birth, particularly to interference with the oxytocin system.
|60 members and 9,986 guests|
|4thtimemama , Ajbaby , americanjuly , anita89 , Ann-Marita , apeydef , Azik's mom , bananabee , belltree , bluefaery , Bluet , bren94 , catladymeow , Crimson8 , Dawn's mom , elliha , frances bakin' , funfunkyfantastic , Incubator , [email protected] , JudiAU , junipermuse , katelove , Kim13 , LiLStar , lilykate , Marumi , maryeb , Milk8shake , mintapatalk , MissMuffet , MOMentarily Distracted , moominmamma , MylittleTiger , NaturallyKait , neemoomommy , Nemi27 , prosciencemum , SandiMae , sarabecca , sarafl , Serafina33 , shantimama , sofreshsoclean , sortacrispy , SparklePony , spiderdust , Springshowers , ssun5 , Tigerle , TrishWSU , uzra_hashmi@rediff , Wild Rose , zebra15|
|Most users ever online was 449,755, 06-25-2014 at 12:21 PM.|